Suppr超能文献

外周和中枢嗅觉与老年人虚弱的关联。

The Association of Peripheral and Central Olfaction With Frailty in Older Adults.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Jul 8;78(7):1276-1283. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac237.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Olfactory impairment is increasingly recognized as a biomarker of frailty, but the relationship between olfactory subdomains that describe peripheral or central dysfunction and frailty remains unexplored.

METHODS

We examined 1 160 older adults from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 3. Olfactory identification (OI): the ability to identify an odorant; and olfactory sensitivity (OS): the ability to detect the presence of an odorant, were assessed using 5- and 6-point measures, respectively. Frailty was operationalized as both a 37-item frailty index (FI) and the 5-item Physical Frailty Phenotype (PFP). Mixed models were fit to examine the association between OI, OS, FI, and PFP, while adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.

RESULTS

Participants in the most-frail PFP category had lower OI and OS scores (OI: 3.88 vs 4.19, p = .016; OS: 3.15 vs 3.47, p = .031), whereas participants in the most-frail FI category exhibited lower OI scores but not OS scores when compared to nonfrail participants (OI: 3.72 vs 4.27, p = .014; OS: 3.19 vs 3.43, p = .476). Adjusted mixed models showed that a point increase in OI was associated with a lower PFP score (β = -0.107, p = .006) and FI score (β = -0.009, p = .010). A point increase in OS was associated with a lower PFP score (β = -0.058, p = .016) but not FI score (β = -0.004, p = .064).

CONCLUSION

Both OS and OI, predominantly peripheral and central measures of olfaction, respectively, are associated with frailty implicating olfaction as a potential biomarker and risk factor for frailty.

摘要

背景

嗅觉障碍越来越被认为是脆弱的生物标志物,但描述外周或中枢功能障碍的嗅觉子领域与脆弱之间的关系仍未得到探索。

方法

我们研究了来自国家社会生活、健康和老龄化项目第 3 波的 1160 名老年人。嗅觉识别(OI):识别气味的能力;嗅觉敏感度(OS):检测气味存在的能力,分别使用 5 点和 6 点测量来评估。脆弱性通过 37 项脆弱指数(FI)和 5 项身体脆弱表型(PFP)来操作化。混合模型用于检验 OI、OS、FI 和 PFP 之间的关联,同时调整人口统计学和临床协变量。

结果

在最脆弱的 PFP 类别中,参与者的 OI 和 OS 得分较低(OI:3.88 与 4.19,p=0.016;OS:3.15 与 3.47,p=0.031),而与非脆弱参与者相比,在最脆弱的 FI 类别中,参与者的 OI 得分较低但 OS 得分没有差异(OI:3.72 与 4.27,p=0.014;OS:3.19 与 3.43,p=0.476)。调整后的混合模型显示,OI 增加一个点与 PFP 得分较低相关(β=-0.107,p=0.006)和 FI 得分较低相关(β=-0.009,p=0.010)。OS 增加一个点与 PFP 得分较低相关(β=-0.058,p=0.016)但与 FI 得分无关(β=-0.004,p=0.064)。

结论

OS 和 OI 分别是外周和中枢嗅觉的主要测量指标,均与脆弱相关,表明嗅觉可能是脆弱的潜在生物标志物和危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验