Singnurkar Amit, Poon Raymond, Detsky Jay
Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Program in Evidence-Based Care, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Department of Oncology, McMaster University McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
J Neurooncol. 2023 Jan;161(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04201-6. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
To provide a summary of the diagnostic performance of F-FET-PET in the management of patients with high-grade brain gliomas or metastases from extracranial primary malignancies.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched for studies that reported on diagnostic test parameters in radiotherapy planning, response assessment, and tumour recurrence/treatment-related changes differentiation. Radiomic studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool and the GRADE approach. A bivariate, random-effects model was used to produce summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity.
Twenty-six studies with a total of 1206 patients/lesions were included in the analysis. For radiotherapy planning of glioma, the pooled proportion of patients from 3 studies with F-FET uptake extending beyond the 20 mm margin from the gadolinium enhancement on standard MRI was 39% (95% CI, 10-73%). In 3 studies, F-FET-PET was also shown to be predictive of early responders to treatment, whereas MRI failed to show any prognostic value. For the differentiation of glioma recurrence from treatment-related changes, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of TBR 1.9-2.3 from 6 studies were 91% (95% CI, 74-97%) and 84% (95% CI, 69-93%), respectively. The respective values for brain metastases from 4 studies were 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) using TBR 2.15-3.11.
While F-FET shows promise as a complementary modality to standard-of-care MRI for the management of primary and metastatic brain malignancies, further validation with standardized image interpretation methods in well-designed prospective studies are warranted.
总结¹⁸F-氟代乙基酪氨酸正电子发射断层扫描(¹⁸F-FET-PET)在高级别脑胶质瘤或颅外原发性恶性肿瘤转移患者管理中的诊断性能。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane系统评价数据库,查找报告放射治疗计划、疗效评估以及肿瘤复发/治疗相关变化鉴别诊断试验参数的研究。排除放射组学研究。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具和GRADE方法进行质量评估。采用双变量随机效应模型得出敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值。
分析纳入26项研究,共1206例患者/病灶。对于胶质瘤的放射治疗计划,3项研究中¹⁸F-FET摄取超出标准MRI钆增强边缘20 mm范围的患者合并比例为39%(95%CI,10%-73%)。在3项研究中,¹⁸F-FET-PET还显示出对治疗早期反应者的预测能力,而MRI未显示出任何预后价值。对于鉴别胶质瘤复发与治疗相关变化,6项研究中肿瘤代谢比(TBR)为1.9 - 2.3时的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为91%(95%CI,74%-97%)和84%(95%CI,69%-93%)。4项研究中脑转移瘤使用TBR 2.15 - 3.11时的相应值分别为82%(95%CI,74%-88%)和82%(95%CI,74%-88%)。
虽然¹⁸F-FET作为原发性和转移性脑恶性肿瘤管理中标准护理MRI的补充手段显示出前景,但需要在精心设计的前瞻性研究中采用标准化图像解读方法进行进一步验证。