Suppr超能文献

75 岁或以上患有静脉血栓栓塞症的癌症患者化疗期间直接口服抗凝剂与华法林的安全性和有效性比较:一项全国性住院患者数据库研究。

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin during Chemotherapy in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism Aged 75 Years or Older: A Nationwide Inpatient Database Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2023;69(5):561-570. doi: 10.1159/000528606. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication occurring in cancer patients. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or warfarin are widely prescribed for treating cancer-associated VTE. However, data are sparse as to the effectiveness and bleeding complications associated with these medications in elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to compare effectiveness and safety profiles between DOACs and warfarin in elderly cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we retrospectively identified cancer patients aged ≥75 years who developed VTE during chemotherapy (n = 4,278, January 2016 to March 2020). Eligible patients were divided into those receiving warfarin (n = 557) and DOACs (n = 3,721). We conducted a 1:4 propensity score matching analysis to adjust for measured confounders. The primary outcome was VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding requiring hospitalization and inhospital death from all causes within 6 months.

RESULTS

The propensity-matched cohort included 557 patients in the warfarin group and 2,278 patients in the DOACs group. The proportion of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization was lower in the DOACs group (5.3% vs. 7.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.98). The proportion of recurrent deep vein thrombosis was 6.3% and 4.4%, while that of recurrent pulmonary emboli was 1.3% and 1.3% in the warfarin and DOACs groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of major bleeding events requiring hospitalization (1.6% vs. 1.1%; OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.62-3.50) or all-cause inhospital mortality (11.1% vs. 9.9%; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84-1.56) between the DOACs and warfarin groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that DOACs may be more effective than warfarin in terms of VTE recurrence requiring hospitalization and that these medications may be equivalent in terms of safety.

摘要

简介

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是癌症患者发生的一种危及生命的并发症。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)或华法林被广泛用于治疗与癌症相关的 VTE。然而,关于这些药物在老年患者中的有效性和出血并发症的数据很少。本研究的目的是比较 DOACs 和华法林在接受化疗的老年癌症患者中的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们使用诊断程序组合住院数据库,回顾性地确定了在化疗期间发生 VTE 的年龄≥75 岁的癌症患者(n=4278,2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月)。符合条件的患者分为接受华法林(n=557)和 DOACs(n=3721)的患者。我们进行了 1:4 的倾向评分匹配分析,以调整测量的混杂因素。主要结局是需要住院治疗的 VTE 复发。次要结局是 6 个月内因任何原因导致的大出血需要住院治疗和院内死亡。

结果

倾向评分匹配队列包括华法林组的 557 例患者和 DOACs 组的 2278 例患者。DOACs 组需要住院治疗的 VTE 复发比例较低(5.3% vs. 7.5%;比值比[OR],0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.48-0.98)。华法林组和 DOACs 组分别有 6.3%和 4.4%的患者出现复发性深静脉血栓形成,1.3%和 1.3%的患者出现复发性肺栓塞。在需要住院治疗的大出血事件比例(1.6% vs. 1.1%;OR,1.47;95%CI,0.62-3.50)或因任何原因导致的院内死亡率(11.1% vs. 9.9%;OR,1.14;95%CI,0.84-1.56)方面,DOACs 组与华法林组之间无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,DOACs 在需要住院治疗的 VTE 复发方面可能比华法林更有效,并且在安全性方面这两种药物可能相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae08/10332483/abcad9c6890c/ger-0069-0561-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验