Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;16(12):2403-2412. doi: 10.1111/jth.14303. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
Essentials Bleeding risk by anticoagulant choice for cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CA-VTE) is unknown. 26 894 people with CA-VTE were followed for bleeding in a claims database in the United States. Hospitalized bleeding risk was similar with direct acting oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin. Relative hospitalized bleeding risk varied by cancer type and anticoagulant choice. SUMMARY: Background Direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with less bleeding than traditional venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatments in the general population but are little studied in cancer-associated VTE (CA-VTE). Objective To determine whether different anticoagulation strategies for CA-VTE have different hospitalized bleeding rates. Patients/Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients with CA-VTE, diagnosed between 2011 and 2015, in a large administrative database. Using validated algorithms, we identified 26 894 CA-VTE patients treated with anticoagulants and followed them for hospitalized severe bleeding. Cox models were used to assess bleeding risk, adjusted for age, sex, high dimensional propensity score and frailty. Results Over 27 281 person-years of follow-up (median 0.6 years), 1204 bleeding events occurred, for a bleeding rate of 4.4% per patient-year. Bleeding rates varied by cancer type, with the highest rate for upper gastrointestinal cancers (8.6%) and the lowest for breast cancer (2.9%). In Cox models (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]), compared with warfarin, DOACS and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) had similar hazards of bleeding (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.69-1.11 and 0.98; 0.85-1.13). Compared with LMWH, there was no difference in hazard of bleeding with DOACs (0.86; 0.66-1.12). There was heterogeneity in bleeding risk with DOACs by cancer type, with a higher risk of bleeding in upper gastrointestinal cancers and lower risk of bleeding in prostate cancer and hematologic cancers. Conclusions In this practice-based sample of CA-VTE patients, DOACs were associated with similar bleeding risks to warfarin and LMWH. These findings suggest a complex association of bleeding risk with anticoagulant choice in cancer patients.
癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症(CA-VTE)患者的抗凝药物选择与出血风险之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究在美国的一个理赔数据库中对 26894 例 CA-VTE 患者进行了出血随访。结果发现,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与华法林相比,住院出血风险相似。不同癌症类型和抗凝药物选择的相对住院出血风险存在差异。
直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在普通人群中的出血风险低于传统静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)治疗药物,但在癌症相关 VTE(CA-VTE)中的研究较少。
确定 CA-VTE 的不同抗凝策略是否具有不同的住院出血率。
患者/方法:我们对 2011 年至 2015 年间在大型行政数据库中诊断为 CA-VTE 的患者进行了回顾性研究。使用验证后的算法,我们确定了 26894 例接受抗凝治疗的 CA-VTE 患者,并对其进行了严重住院出血的随访。使用 Cox 模型评估出血风险,调整年龄、性别、高维倾向评分和脆弱性。
在 27281 人年的随访期间(中位数 0.6 年),发生了 1204 例出血事件,患者年出血率为 4.4%。出血率因癌症类型而异,上消化道癌症的出血率最高(8.6%),乳腺癌的出血率最低(2.9%)。在 Cox 模型中(风险比[HR];95%置信区间[CI]),与华法林相比,DOACs 和低分子肝素(LMWH)的出血风险相似(HR,0.88;95%CI,0.69-1.11 和 0.98;0.85-1.13)。与 LMWH 相比,DOACs 的出血风险无差异(0.86;0.66-1.12)。DOACs 的出血风险存在癌症类型的异质性,上消化道癌症的出血风险较高,前列腺癌和血液系统癌症的出血风险较低。
在这项基于实践的 CA-VTE 患者样本中,DOACs 的出血风险与华法林和 LMWH 相似。这些发现提示,在癌症患者中,抗凝药物选择与出血风险之间存在复杂的关联。