Lin Qinhao, Gao Zhong, Zhu Weikun, Chen Jiangyao, An Taicheng
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Guangdong Technology Research Center for Photocatalytic Technology Integration and Equipment Engineering, Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Contaminants Exposure and Health, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Health Risk Control, Guangdong Technology Research Center for Photocatalytic Technology Integration and Equipment Engineering, Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
J Environ Sci (China). 2023 Apr;126:722-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Fugitive emission has been becoming an important source of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in pharmaceutical industry, but the exact contribution of fugitive emission remains incompletely understood. In present study, pollution characteristics, odorous activity and health risk of stack and fugitive emissions of VOCs from four functional units (e.g., workshop, sewage treatment station, raw material storage and hazardous waste storage) of three representative pharmaceutical factories were investigated. Workshop was the dominant contributor to VOCs of fugitive emission in comparison with other functional units. Extreme high concentration of VOCs from fugitive emission in unsealed workshop (94.87 mg/m) was observed relative to sealed one (1.18 mg/m), accounting for 31% and 5% of total VOCs, respectively. Fugitive emission of VOCs in the unsealed workshop mainly consisted of n-hexane, 1-hexene and dichloromethane. Odorous activity indexes and non-cancer hazard ratios of these VOCs from fugitive emission in the unsealed workshop were as high as that from stack exhaust. Furthermore, cancer risk of dichloromethane from fugitive emission and stack exhaust was up to (1.6-1.8) × 10. Odorous activity or health risk index of the VOCs from fugitive emission was up to 13 or 11 times of the corresponding threshold value, posing remarkable health threat on pharmaceutical workers. Our findings highlighted the possibly underestimated contribution of fugitive emission on VOCs in the pharmaceutical industry.
无组织排放已成为制药行业挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的重要来源,但无组织排放的确切贡献仍未完全了解。在本研究中,对三家代表性制药厂的四个功能单元(如车间、污水处理站、原料库和危险废物库)的VOCs的烟囱排放和无组织排放的污染特征、气味活性和健康风险进行了调查。与其他功能单元相比,车间是无组织排放VOCs的主要贡献者。观察到未密封车间的无组织排放VOCs浓度极高(94.87mg/m),而密封车间为(1.18mg/m),分别占总VOCs的31%和5%。未密封车间的VOCs无组织排放主要由正己烷、1-己烯和二氯甲烷组成。未密封车间这些VOCs无组织排放的气味活性指数和非致癌危害比与烟囱排放的相当。此外,二氯甲烷无组织排放和烟囱排放的致癌风险高达(1.6-1.8)×10。VOCs无组织排放的气味活性或健康风险指数高达相应阈值的13倍或11倍,对制药工人构成显著的健康威胁。我们的研究结果突出了制药行业无组织排放对VOCs的贡献可能被低估。