• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期激活左心室四极导线和多点起搏功能的心脏再同步治疗患者的应答率。QUARTO III。

Response rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients implanted with a left ventricular quadripolar lead and the MultiPoint™ pacing feature early activated. QUARTO III.

作者信息

Osca Joaquín, Francisco-Pascual Jaume, Martínez-Basterra Javier, Martínez Juan Gabriel, Reis Hipólito, Oliveira Mario, Campos Bieito, Balaguer Javier, Rubio Jerónimo, Pavón-Jiménez Ricardo, Hernández Julio, Ormaetxe Jose Miguel, Zamorano Jose Luis, Santamaría Pilar, Alzueta Javier

机构信息

Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBER-CV, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Apr;53(4):e13935. doi: 10.1111/eci.13935. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1111/eci.13935
PMID:36504276
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in most heart failure patients, up to 40% do not respond to CRT. It has been suggested that multipoint left ventricle pacing (MPP) would increase the response rate.

AIM

To assess the CRT response rate at 6 months in patients implanted with a CRT device with the MPP feature activated early after the implant.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, open-label and non-randomized study. The primary endpoint was response to biventricular pacing defined as >15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) comparing echocardiography measurements performed at baseline and 6 months by a core laboratory. Among secondary endpoints the combined endpoint of mortality or all-cause hospitalizations was evaluated. Primary study endpoint and clinical outcomes were compared to a Quarto II control cohort.

RESULTS

Totally, 105 patients were included. The response rate was 64.6% (97.5% lower confidence bound 53%). Mean relative reduction in LVESV was 25.3%, and mean absolute increase in LVEF was 9.4%. The subjects with device programmed using anatomical approach showed a trend towards higher responder rate than those using the electrical approach (72% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.32). Finally, the combined incidence of mortality and or all-cause hospitalizations at 6 month was 12.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Early activation of MPP was not associated to an advantage increasing echocardiography responders to CRT at 6 months of follow-up. Nevertheless, patients programmed using widest pacing cathodes had a numerically higher responder rate. Finally, early activation of MPP was associated to a low incidence of clinical endpoints at 6 months of follow-up.

摘要

背景

尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对大多数心力衰竭患者有益,但高达40%的患者对CRT无反应。有人提出多点左心室起搏(MPP)可提高反应率。

目的

评估植入具有MPP功能且在植入后早期激活该功能的CRT装置的患者6个月时的CRT反应率。

方法

这是一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签且非随机的研究。主要终点是双心室起搏反应,定义为通过核心实验室比较基线和6个月时超声心动图测量结果,左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)相对减少>15%。在次要终点中,评估了死亡率或全因住院的联合终点。将主要研究终点和临床结果与Quarto II对照队列进行比较。

结果

共纳入105例患者。反应率为64.6%(97.5%置信下限为53%)。LVESV的平均相对减少率为25.3%,左心室射血分数(LVEF)的平均绝对增加率为9.4%。采用解剖学方法进行设备程控的受试者的反应率有高于采用电学方法者的趋势(72%对61.1%,p = 0.32)。最后,6个月时死亡率和/或全因住院的联合发生率为12.4%。

结论

在随访6个月时,早期激活MPP与增加CRT的超声心动图反应者优势无关。然而,使用最宽起搏阴极进行程控的患者反应率在数值上更高。最后,早期激活MPP与随访6个月时临床终点的低发生率相关。

相似文献

1
Response rate in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients implanted with a left ventricular quadripolar lead and the MultiPoint™ pacing feature early activated. QUARTO III.早期激活左心室四极导线和多点起搏功能的心脏再同步治疗患者的应答率。QUARTO III。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Apr;53(4):e13935. doi: 10.1111/eci.13935. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
2
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I.多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP)研究中对心脏再同步治疗无反应者向有反应者转换率:I 期研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Sep 14;40(35):2979-2987. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz109.
3
Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the MORE-CRT MPP trial.MORE-CRT MPP 试验中心力再同步治疗无反应者到有反应者的转化率。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad294.
4
Multipoint left ventricular pacing with large anatomical separation improves reverse remodeling and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in responders and non-responders to conventional biventricular pacing.多点左心室起搏与大解剖分离可改善对常规双心室起搏有反应和无反应者的逆向重构和对心脏再同步治疗的反应。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Feb;109(2):183-193. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01499-7. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing therapy: MOre REsponse on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II).多点起搏治疗评估心脏再同步治疗的安全性和有效性的随机临床试验的原理和设计:多点起搏(MORE-CRT MPP-PHASE II)的更多反应。
Am Heart J. 2019 Mar;209:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
6
Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP).多点起搏通过四极左心室导线:心脏再同步治疗中多点左心室起搏的意大利注册研究(IRON-MPP)的初步结果。
Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1170-1177. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw094.
7
Long-term reverse remodeling and clinical improvement by MultiPoint Pacing in a randomized, international, Middle Eastern heart failure study.多部位起搏在一项随机、国际性、中东心力衰竭研究中的长期逆向重构和临床改善。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Mar;63(2):399-407. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00928-2. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with and without pressure-volume loop optimization: comparison of the long-term efficacy of two different programming strategies.多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的反应,无论是否进行压力-容积环优化:两种不同程控策略的长期疗效比较。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar;54(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0480-6. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.在单个冠状窦分支中进行多点左心室起搏可改善心脏再同步治疗的中期超声心动图表现及临床反应。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/jce.12513. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The MultiPoint Pacing Trial.多点起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的安全性和有效性:多点起搏试验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1510-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Sep 27.