• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于出血性转化预测的机器学习方法:捕捉预测因子的相互作用。

Machine learning approach for hemorrhagic transformation prediction: Capturing predictors' interaction.

作者信息

Elsaid Ahmed F, Fahmi Rasha M, Shehta Nahed, Ramadan Bothina M

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 24;13:951401. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.951401. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.951401
PMID:36504664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9731336/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with ischemic stroke frequently develop hemorrhagic transformation (HT), which could potentially worsen the prognosis. The objectives of the current study were to determine the incidence and predictors of HT, to evaluate predictor interaction, and to identify the optimal predicting models.

METHODS

A prospective study included 360 patients with ischemic stroke, of whom 354 successfully continued the study. Patients were subjected to thorough general and neurological examination and T2 diffusion-weighted MRI, at admission and 1 week later to determine the incidence of HT. HT predictors were selected by a filter-based minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) algorithm independent of model performance. Several machine learning algorithms including multivariable logistic regression classifier (LRC), support vector classifier (SVC), random forest classifier (RFC), gradient boosting classifier (GBC), and multilayer perceptron classifier (MLPC) were optimized for HT prediction in a randomly selected half of the sample (training set) and tested in the other half of the sample (testing set). The model predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and visualized by observing case distribution relative to the models' predicted three-dimensional (3D) hypothesis spaces within the testing dataset true feature space. The interaction between predictors was investigated using generalized additive modeling (GAM).

RESULTS

The incidence of HT in patients with ischemic stroke was 19.8%. Infarction size, cerebral microbleeds (CMB), and the National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) were identified as the best HT predictors. RFC (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95) and GBC (AUC: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.95) demonstrated significantly superior performance compared to LRC (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.91) and MLPC (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.78-0.92). SVC (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94) outperformed LRC and MLPC but did not reach statistical significance. LRC and MLPC did not show significant differences. The best models' 3D hypothesis spaces demonstrated non-linear decision boundaries suggesting an interaction between predictor variables. GAM analysis demonstrated a linear and non-linear significant interaction between NIHSS and CMB and between NIHSS and infarction size, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cerebral microbleeds, NIHSS, and infarction size were identified as HT predictors. The best predicting models were RFC and GBC capable of capturing nonlinear interaction between predictors. Predictor interaction suggests a dynamic, rather than, fixed cutoff risk value for any of these predictors.

摘要

背景与目的

缺血性中风患者常发生出血性转化(HT),这可能会使预后恶化。本研究的目的是确定HT的发生率和预测因素,评估预测因素之间的相互作用,并确定最佳预测模型。

方法

一项前瞻性研究纳入了360例缺血性中风患者,其中354例成功完成研究。患者在入院时和1周后接受全面的体格和神经学检查以及T2加权扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI),以确定HT的发生率。通过基于过滤器的最小冗余最大相关性(mRMR)算法独立于模型性能来选择HT预测因素。几种机器学习算法,包括多变量逻辑回归分类器(LRC)、支持向量分类器(SVC)、随机森林分类器(RFC)、梯度提升分类器(GBC)和多层感知器分类器(MLPC),在随机选择的一半样本(训练集)中针对HT预测进行优化,并在另一半样本(测试集)中进行测试。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)评估模型预测性能,并通过观察测试数据集中真实特征空间内相对于模型预测的三维(3D)假设空间的病例分布进行可视化。使用广义相加模型(GAM)研究预测因素之间的相互作用。

结果

缺血性中风患者中HT的发生率为19.8%。梗死面积、脑微出血(CMB)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)被确定为最佳的HT预测因素。与LRC(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.85,95%置信区间[CI]:0.79 - 0.91)和MLPC(AUC:0.85,95% CI:0.78 - 0.92)相比,RFC(AUC:0.91,95% CI:0.85 - 0.95)和GBC(AUC:0.91,95% CI:0.86 - 0.95)表现出显著更优的性能。SVC(AUC:0.90,95% CI:0.85 - 0.94)优于LRC和MLPC,但未达到统计学显著性。LRC和MLPC之间未显示出显著差异。最佳模型的3D假设空间显示出非线性决策边界,表明预测变量之间存在相互作用。GAM分析分别显示NIHSS与CMB之间以及NIHSS与梗死面积之间存在线性和非线性显著相互作用。

结论

脑微出血、NIHSS和梗死面积被确定为HT的预测因素。最佳预测模型是能够捕捉预测因素之间非线性相互作用的RFC和GBC。预测因素之间的相互作用表明,这些预测因素中的任何一个都具有动态而非固定的截断风险值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/0e06864ee646/fneur-13-951401-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/a46444e5ea99/fneur-13-951401-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/f9be8d2ec83b/fneur-13-951401-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/5cf65d47fd81/fneur-13-951401-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/0e06864ee646/fneur-13-951401-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/a46444e5ea99/fneur-13-951401-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/f9be8d2ec83b/fneur-13-951401-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/5cf65d47fd81/fneur-13-951401-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c7/9731336/0e06864ee646/fneur-13-951401-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning approach for hemorrhagic transformation prediction: Capturing predictors' interaction.用于出血性转化预测的机器学习方法:捕捉预测因子的相互作用。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 24;13:951401. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.951401. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of risk factors of hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke: cerebral microbleeds do not correlate with hemorrhagic transformation.急性缺血性卒中后出血转化的危险因素分析:脑微出血与出血转化不相关。
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014 Sep;70(1):135-42. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-9869-8.
3
Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Hemorrhage Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke After Alteplase.基于机器学习的阿替普酶治疗后急性缺血性卒中出血转化预测模型
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 10;13:897903. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.897903. eCollection 2022.
4
Computed Tomography Perfusion Derived Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Does Not Yet Improve Prediction of Hemorrhagic Transformation.计算机断层扫描灌注衍生的血脑屏障通透性尚未改善对出血性转化的预测。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;45(1-2):26-32. doi: 10.1159/000485043. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Explainable machine learning for predicting neurological outcome in hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients in critical care.用于预测重症监护中出血性和缺血性中风患者神经功能预后的可解释机器学习。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 10;15:1385013. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1385013. eCollection 2024.
6
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
7
Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging-based texture analysis for hemorrhage transformation in large cerebral infarction.基于磁共振成像的纹理分析对大脑大面积梗死出血转化的预测价值
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 22;16:923708. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.923708. eCollection 2022.
8
Nomogram prediction model for the risk of intracranial hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓后颅内出血转化风险的列线图预测模型
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1361035. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1361035. eCollection 2024.
9
Cerebral Microbleeds are an Independent Predictor of Hemorrhagic Transformation Following Intravenous Alteplase Administration in Acute Ischemic Stroke.脑微出血是急性缺血性卒中静脉注射阿替普酶后出血转化的独立预测因素。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1403-1411. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.12.044. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Constructing machine learning models based on non-contrast CT radiomics to predict hemorrhagic transformation after stoke: a two-center study.基于非增强CT影像组学构建机器学习模型以预测卒中后出血转化:一项双中心研究
Front Neurol. 2024 Sep 2;15:1413795. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1413795. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Early Predictive Accuracy of Machine Learning for Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习对急性缺血性卒中出血转化的早期预测准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e71654. doi: 10.2196/71654.
2
Artificial intelligence in stroke risk assessment and management via retinal imaging.通过视网膜成像进行中风风险评估与管理的人工智能
Front Comput Neurosci. 2025 Feb 17;19:1490603. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2025.1490603. eCollection 2025.
3
Traditional and machine learning models for predicting haemorrhagic transformation in ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Severe Complications After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study Based on the Stroke Registry of Northwestern Germany.基于德国西北部卒中注册研究的急性缺血性卒中后严重并发症预测模型的建立与验证
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023175. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023175. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Machine Learning in Action: Stroke Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.《机器学习实战:中风诊断与预后预测》
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 6;12:734345. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.734345. eCollection 2021.
3
Total small vessel disease burden and functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke.
预测缺血性卒中出血转化的传统模型和机器学习模型:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 22;14(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02771-w.
4
Machine learning and deep learning algorithms in stroke medicine: a systematic review of hemorrhagic transformation prediction models.中风医学中的机器学习与深度学习算法:出血性转化预测模型的系统综述
J Neurol. 2024 Dec 12;272(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12810-6.
5
Machine learning-based predictive model for the development of thrombolysis resistance in patients with acute ischemic stroke.基于机器学习的急性缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓抵抗发生预测模型。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03781-2.
6
Explainable machine learning for predicting neurological outcome in hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke patients in critical care.用于预测重症监护中出血性和缺血性中风患者神经功能预后的可解释机器学习。
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 10;15:1385013. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1385013. eCollection 2024.
7
A comprehensive review for artificial intelligence on neuroimaging in rehabilitation of ischemic stroke.关于人工智能在缺血性中风康复中神经影像学应用的综合综述。
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1367854. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1367854. eCollection 2024.
8
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for cage subsidence after instrumented posterior lumbar fusion based on machine learning: a retrospective observational cohort study.基于机器学习的后路腰椎融合内固定术后椎间融合器下沉风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性观察队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 21;10:1196384. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1196384. eCollection 2023.
9
Artificial Intelligence for Automated DWI/FLAIR Mismatch Assessment on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke: A Systematic Review.人工智能用于中风磁共振成像中自动扩散加权成像/液体衰减反转恢复序列不匹配评估:一项系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;13(12):2111. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122111.
缺血性脑卒中患者的总小血管疾病负担与功能结局。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 12;15(11):e0242319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242319. eCollection 2020.
4
The relation between APOE genotype and cerebral microbleeds in cognitively unimpaired middle- and old-aged individuals.载脂蛋白 E 基因型与认知正常的中老年人群脑微出血的关系。
Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Nov;95:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Hemodynamics and Hemorrhagic Transformation After Endovascular Therapy for Ischemic Stroke.缺血性卒中血管内治疗后的血流动力学与出血性转化
Front Neurol. 2020 Jul 17;11:728. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00728. eCollection 2020.
6
Machine Learning Confirms Nonlinear Relationship between Severity of Peripheral Arterial Disease, Functional Limitation and Symptom Severity.机器学习证实外周动脉疾病严重程度、功能受限与症状严重程度之间存在非线性关系。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jul 24;10(8):515. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080515.
7
The Role of Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Upon Clinical Complications and Outcomes.出血性转化在急性缺血性卒中临床并发症及预后中的作用。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104898. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104898. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Haemorrhagic transformation following ischaemic stroke: A retrospective study.出血性转化与缺血性脑卒中:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 24;10(1):5319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62230-5.
9
Cerebral Microbleeds in an Acute Ischemic Stroke as a Predictor of Hemorrhagic Transformation.急性缺血性卒中中的脑微出血作为出血性转化的预测指标
Cureus. 2018 Sep 15;10(9):e3308. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3308.
10
Perfusion Computed Tomography Accurately Quantifies Collateral Flow After Acute Ischemic Stroke.灌注计算机断层扫描准确量化急性缺血性卒中后的侧支血流。
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):1006-1009. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028284. Epub 2020 Jan 17.