Calamaro Netzah, Donko Moshe, Shmilovitz Doron
Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 17;8(12):e11542. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11542. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The paper settles a discrepancy between two smart-metering methods. The issue bears on a billion installed smart meters and $36B electric-energy trading market. The contemporary problem of the energy-metering registration gap between the methods, relates to energy-trading unified-billing, and it will aggravate in the future. A mathematical definition for active and reactive, import/export energy-metering formulas is given for vector/arithmetic common metering models employing energy formulas rather than power, energy being the language of smart metering design/usage/billing. Economic reasoning, difficulty of implementation, and required regulator's flexibility at establishing different import/export tariffs-per different tariff program-types are explained. Innovations in the presented work include: (1) mathematical formulation of metering-methods-definitions that is validated over: one EU organization, twelve major meter manufacturers, twenty model-types, is presented and tested. (2) formulation of drivers for 100% accurate conversion from one method to another is developed. (3) fifteen real-life experiments covering the entire problem spectrum are conducted with new results, discovering new energy/tariff "conservation-rules", relevant to manufacturers/utility companies/regulators/customers. (4) a correct segmentation of customers to energy/tariff registration-gap is generated. (5) an algebra that is suitable to energy metering/conversion/tariff computation-and-design is presented. (6) research reduces the cost of a contemporary solution by 98%. (6) Advantages/disadvantages of each method are named. (7) scenarios where one of the energy methods may be incorrect are considered-and-rejected. Eleven theorems formulated and proved, and fifteen field test cases covering the entire electricity market. (8) regulators may maintain arithmetic meters, enjoying their added value, and manage precise arithmetic/vector metering using these meters- especially using load profile and potentially satisfying with billing registers.
本文解决了两种智能计量方法之间的差异问题。该问题涉及到已安装的数十亿台智能电表以及价值360亿美元的电能交易市场。两种方法之间在电能计量登记方面存在的当代问题,与电能交易统一计费相关,且在未来会加剧。针对采用能量公式而非功率的矢量/算术通用计量模型,给出了有功和无功、进出口电能计量公式的数学定义,能量是智能计量设计/使用/计费的语言。文中解释了经济推理、实施难度以及监管机构在针对不同电价方案类型设定不同进出口电价时所需的灵活性。本文的创新点包括:(1)给出了计量方法定义的数学公式,并在一个欧盟组织、十二家主要电表制造商、二十种型号上进行了验证和测试。(2)制定了从一种方法到另一种方法100%准确转换的驱动因素。(3)进行了涵盖整个问题范围的十五个实际实验,得出新结果,发现了与制造商/公用事业公司/监管机构/客户相关的新能源/电价“节约规则”。(4)对客户进行了正确的能源/电价登记差距细分。(5)提出了一种适用于电能计量/转换/电价计算与设计的代数方法。(6)研究将当代解决方案的成本降低了98%。(6)指出了每种方法的优缺点。(7)考虑并排除了其中一种电能计量方法可能不正确的情况。提出并证明了十一个定理,涵盖整个电力市场的十五个现场测试案例。(8)监管机构可以保留算术电表,利用其附加价值,并使用这些电表管理精确的算术/矢量计量——特别是利用负荷曲线,并可能对计费记录感到满意。