生物玻璃纳米纤维、地塞米松涂层生物玻璃纳米纤维和富血小板纤维蛋白作为未成熟坏死牙齿再生性牙髓治疗支架的比较评价:一项随机对照试验。
Comparative evaluation of bioglass nanofiber, dexamethasone-coated bioglass nanofiber, and platelet-rich fibrin, as scaffolds in regenerative endodontic treatment of immature necrotic teeth: A randomized controlled trial.
作者信息
Gupta Sakshi, Mittal Neelam, Baranwal Harakh Chand, Rath Chandana, Shankari Thivya, Gupta Supriya
机构信息
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, FODS, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Materials Science, IIT, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
出版信息
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):561-568. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_264_22. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
AIM
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the regenerative endodontic potential of dexamethasone-coated bioglass nanofiber (Dex-BGnf), bioglass nanofiber (BGnf), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) for inducing regeneration in necrotic immature permanent teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 36 ( = 12) immature necrotic teeth with or without evidence of periapical lesion were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups, based on the scaffolds used: Group I (PRF), II (BGnf), and III (Dex-BGnf). The clinical (electric pulp test) and radiographic evaluations (percentage increase in apical diameter, root length, root dentin thickness, and periapical healing) were compared at 6 and 12 months after the procedure with baseline records.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
One-way ANOVA, Tukey analysis, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for evaluating the data. A 6- and 12-month improvement analysis was done using paired -test and Friedman test.
RESULTS
Clinically, all the 36 teeth were asymptomatic, but none gave a positive response to Electric Pulp Test (EPT) in time interval of 12 months. Dex-BGnf showed a statistically significant improvement in terms of increase in root length ( = 0.020) and root dentinal thickness ( = 0.001) when compared to PRF after 12 months.
CONCLUSION
The study has shown that Dex-BGnf yielded significantly better results than PRF for inducing apexogenesis in necrotic immature teeth.
目的
本研究旨在评估和比较地塞米松涂层生物玻璃纳米纤维(Dex-BGnf)、生物玻璃纳米纤维(BGnf)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)在诱导坏死未成熟恒牙再生方面的牙髓再生潜力。
材料与方法
本研究共纳入36颗(每组 = 12颗)有或无根尖周病变证据的未成熟坏死牙齿。根据所使用的支架,将患者随机分为三组:第一组(PRF)、第二组(BGnf)和第三组(Dex-BGnf)。在治疗后6个月和12个月时,将临床(牙髓电测试)和影像学评估(根尖直径增加百分比、牙根长度、牙根牙本质厚度和根尖周愈合情况)与基线记录进行比较。
统计分析
采用单因素方差分析、Tukey分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验来评估数据。使用配对t检验和Friedman检验进行6个月和12个月的改善分析。
结果
临床上,所有36颗牙齿均无症状,但在12个月的时间间隔内,无一例对牙髓电测试(EPT)呈阳性反应。与PRF相比,12个月后Dex-BGnf在牙根长度增加(P = 0.020)和牙根牙本质厚度增加(P = 0.001)方面显示出统计学上的显著改善。
结论
该研究表明,在诱导坏死未成熟牙齿的根尖形成方面,Dex-BGnf产生的结果明显优于PRF。