Hu Bo, Cartagena-Farias Javiera, Brimblecombe Nicola
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Clement's Inn, London, WC2A 2AE UK.
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Aug 2;19(4):1363-1373. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00723-0. eCollection 2022 Dec.
This study investigates the developmental trajectories of long-term care needs and utilisation in older people aged 65 years and over in England. The data came from the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA, waves 6-9, 2012-2018, = 13,425). We conducted dual trajectory analyses to cluster people's trajectories of care needs (measured by functional disability) and utilisation into distinct groups. We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify the factors associated with trajectory memberships. We identified three trajectories of long-term needs (low, medium, and high) and three trajectories of care utilisation (low, medium, and high). Both care needs and care hours increased with age, but the speed of increase varied by trajectory. Females, minority ethnic groups, people with low wealth, and those experiencing housing problems were more likely to follow the joint trajectories characterised by higher care needs and higher care intensity. People with low or medium care needs stayed in the same trajectories of care utilisation. In contrast, people in the high-needs trajectory followed divergent trajectories of care utilisation: 63% of them followed the trajectory of high care intensity and the rest (37%) followed the trajectory of medium care intensity. Lack of spouse care was the leading predictor of trajectory divergence (OR = 3.57, < 0.001). Trajectories of care needs and utilisation are highly heterogeneous in later life, which indicates persistent inequalities over time. Single people with multiple functional limitations face an acute and enduring risk of inadequate care and unmet needs. The amount of support is as important as the availability of support.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-022-00723-0.
本研究调查了英格兰65岁及以上老年人长期护理需求和使用情况的发展轨迹。数据来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA,第6 - 9波,2012 - 2018年,n = 13425)。我们进行了双轨迹分析,将人们的护理需求轨迹(通过功能残疾衡量)和使用情况聚类为不同的组。我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定与轨迹类别相关的因素。我们确定了三种长期需求轨迹(低、中、高)和三种护理使用轨迹(低、中、高)。护理需求和护理时长均随年龄增长,但增长速度因轨迹而异。女性、少数族裔群体、财富水平低的人和那些有住房问题的人更有可能遵循以更高护理需求和更高护理强度为特征的联合轨迹。护理需求低或中等的人保持在相同的护理使用轨迹中。相比之下,高需求轨迹的人遵循不同的护理使用轨迹:其中63%遵循高护理强度轨迹,其余37%遵循中等护理强度轨迹。缺乏配偶护理是轨迹差异的主要预测因素(OR = 3.57,P < 0.001)。护理需求和使用轨迹在晚年高度异质,这表明随着时间的推移存在持续的不平等。有多种功能限制的单身人士面临护理不足和需求未得到满足的严重且持久的风险。支持的数量与支持的可获得性同样重要。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10433 - 022 - 00723 - 0获取的补充材料。