• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来世有人吗?采用三级盲法协议进行的100次通灵读数的准确性。

Is There Someone in the Hereafter? Mediumship Accuracy of 100 Readings Obtained with a Triple Level of Blinding Protocol.

作者信息

Tressoldi Patrizio, Liberale Laura, Sinesio Fernando

机构信息

Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.

GRIM, Vigodarzere, Italy.

出版信息

Omega (Westport). 2025 Jun;91(2):955-963. doi: 10.1177/00302228221146376. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1177/00302228221146376
PMID:36507932
Abstract

The accuracy of information obtained by 28 self-claimant mediums related to 100 readings obtained with a triple level of blinding was examined across three indices: percentage of correct reading identified by the sitters, global score of readings and percentage of difference between correct and incorrect information.All three indices showed statistical differences of the intended versus the control readings: correct identification 65%; global score: intended readings, mean = 2.4, SD = 1.5; control readings, mean = 1.7, SD = 1.2; percentage difference between correct and incorrect information: intended readings, mean = -7.9%, SD = 38.7%; control readings, mean = -27.3%, SD = 38%.Our results using a very large sample, confirm previous results, supporting the hypothesis that self-claimant mediums are able to retrieve correct information about deceased people without knowing and interacting with the sitters having access with only to the deceased persons' first name.

摘要

通过28位自称灵媒进行的与100次阅读相关的信息准确性,在三重盲法水平下进行了检验,涉及三个指标:求问者识别出的正确阅读百分比、阅读的整体得分以及正确与错误信息之间的差异百分比。所有这三个指标在预期阅读与对照阅读之间均显示出统计学差异:正确识别率为65%;整体得分:预期阅读,平均值 = 2.4,标准差 = 1.5;对照阅读,平均值 = 1.7,标准差 = 1.2;正确与错误信息之间的差异百分比:预期阅读,平均值 = -7.9%,标准差 = 38.7%;对照阅读,平均值 = -27.3%,标准差 = 38%。我们使用非常大的样本得出的结果证实了先前的结果,支持了这样一种假设,即自称灵媒能够在不了解求问者且不与求问者互动的情况下,仅通过死者的名字获取有关死者的正确信息。

相似文献

1
Is There Someone in the Hereafter? Mediumship Accuracy of 100 Readings Obtained with a Triple Level of Blinding Protocol.来世有人吗?采用三级盲法协议进行的100次通灵读数的准确性。
Omega (Westport). 2025 Jun;91(2):955-963. doi: 10.1177/00302228221146376. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Mediumship accuracy: A quantitative and qualitative study with a triple-blind protocol.灵媒准确性:一项采用三重盲法协议的定量和定性研究。
Explore (NY). 2022 Jul-Aug;18(4):411-415. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
Anomalous information reception by research mediums demonstrated using a novel triple-blind protocol.使用一种新颖的三盲方案证明了研究媒介对异常信息的接收。
Explore (NY). 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2006.10.004.
4
Anomalous information reception by research mediums under blinded conditions II: replication and extension.研究媒介在盲法条件下的异常信息接收II:复制与扩展
Explore (NY). 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
5
Controlled semi-naturalistic protocol to investigate anomalous information reception in mediumship: Description and preliminary findings.控制半自然主义协议研究通灵中的异常信息接收:描述和初步发现。
Explore (NY). 2022 Sep-Oct;18(5):539-544. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
An investigation of mediums who claim to give information about deceased persons.对那些声称能提供有关已故人员信息的灵媒的调查。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jan;199(1):11-7. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31820439da.
7
Testing alleged mediumistic writing: An experimental controlled study.检测所谓的媒介书写:一项实验性对照研究。
Explore (NY). 2022 Jan-Feb;18(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Testing alleged mediumship: methods and results.
Br J Psychol. 2005 May;96(Pt 2):165-79. doi: 10.1348/000712605X36361.
9
Anomalous information reception by mediums: A meta-analysis of the scientific evidence.超常信息接收者:科学证据的元分析。
Explore (NY). 2021 Sep-Oct;17(5):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
10
Hematological and Psychophysiological Correlates of Anomalous Information Reception in Mediums: A Preliminary Exploration.异常信息接收者的血液学和心理生理学相关性研究:一项初步探索。
Explore (NY). 2019 Mar-Apr;15(2):126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Aug 2.