Department of Prosthodontics, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya, Turkey.
Department of Endodontics, Antalya Bilim University, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya, Turkey,
Am J Dent. 2022 Dec;35(6):284-290.
To evaluate and compare in vitro and in vivo color parameters of hybrid ceramic, resin nanoceramic, and artificial acrylic resin teeth.
For the in vitro stages, 120 specimens (2 mm) were prepared from Vita Enamic (VE), Lava Ultimate (LU), CeraSmart (CS), and acrylic teeth (IV), and immersed in coffee, red wine, and distilled water for 24, 72, and 144 hours. For the in vivo stage, 16 individuals received a complete denture that had upper premolars made of VE, LU, CS blocks, and IV. The color was measured at 1, 3, and 6 months. Color difference (ΔE₀₀), translucency (TP), and contrast ratio (CR) were obtained using a spectrophotometer. Shapiro Wilk, one-way ANOVA, and repeated measures ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.
ΔE₀₀ of VE and LU were higher than CS and IV (P< 0.05). ΔTP of VE and LU were lower than CS and IV (P< 0.05). ΔTP of CS was higher in red wine compared to coffee. ΔCR of CS and IV were increased with prolonged immersion (P< 0.001). ΔE₀₀ and ΔCR were similarly affected in coffee and red wine. All discolorations were higher than clinical acceptability (ΔE₀₀> 1.77). For in vivo stages, ΔE₀₀ of VE and LU increased over time (P< 0.01). No difference was detected between in vivo and in vitro ΔE₀₀ of CS (P> 0.05). ΔE₀₀ of VE, LU, and IV was higher in in vitro stages. LU and VE showed lower color stability; their use in esthetic regions is questionable. The prolonged immersion increased discoloration. Coffee and red wine had a similar effect on discoloration and opalescence. Discoloration in laboratory conditions did not correspond to the clinical discoloration according to the new method presented in this study.
The use of CAD-CAM blocks for endocrowns is rising; however, Lava Ultimate and Vita Enamic showed lower color stability, thus, their use in esthetic regions is questionable. This is the first study that investigates the discoloration of CAD-CAM blocks in clinical use. Discoloration in laboratory conditions did not correspond to the clinical discoloration.
评估和比较混合陶瓷、树脂纳米陶瓷和人工丙烯酸树脂牙的体外和体内颜色参数。
在体外阶段,从 Vita Enamic(VE)、Lava Ultimate(LU)、CeraSmart(CS)和丙烯酸树脂牙(IV)中制备了 120 个(2 毫米)样本,并将其浸入咖啡、红酒和蒸馏水 24、72 和 144 小时。在体内阶段,16 名个体接受了全口义齿修复,上颌前磨牙由 VE、LU、CS 块和 IV 制成。在 1、3 和 6 个月时测量颜色。使用分光光度计获得颜色差异(ΔE₀₀)、半透明度(TP)和对比度比(CR)。Shapiro-Wilk、单因素方差分析和重复测量方差分析用于统计分析。
VE 和 LU 的 ΔE₀₀ 高于 CS 和 IV(P<0.05)。VE 和 LU 的 ΔTP 低于 CS 和 IV(P<0.05)。CS 在红酒中的 ΔTP 高于咖啡。CS 和 IV 的 ΔCR 随着浸泡时间的延长而增加(P<0.001)。在咖啡和红酒中,ΔE₀₀ 和 ΔCR 受到相似的影响。所有变色都高于临床可接受性(ΔE₀₀>1.77)。在体内阶段,VE 和 LU 的 ΔE₀₀ 随时间增加(P<0.01)。CS 的体内和体外 ΔE₀₀ 之间没有差异(P>0.05)。VE、LU 和 IV 的体外 ΔE₀₀ 较高。LU 和 VE 的颜色稳定性较低;它们在美学区域的使用存在疑问。长时间浸泡会增加变色。咖啡和红酒对变色和乳光有相似的影响。根据本研究提出的新方法,实验室条件下的变色与临床变色不一致。
CAD-CAM 嵌体的使用正在增加;然而,Lava Ultimate 和 Vita Enamic 显示出较低的颜色稳定性,因此,它们在美学区域的使用存在疑问。这是第一项研究 CAD-CAM 嵌体在临床使用中的变色情况。实验室条件下的变色与临床变色不一致。