• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录 (EHR) 系统中不典型糖尿病的算法识别。

Algorithmic identification of atypical diabetes in electronic health record (EHR) systems.

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Endocrine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278759. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0278759
PMID:36508462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9744270/
Abstract

AIMS

Understanding atypical forms of diabetes (AD) may advance precision medicine, but methods to identify such patients are needed. We propose an electronic health record (EHR)-based algorithmic approach to identify patients who may have AD, specifically those with insulin-sufficient, non-metabolic diabetes, in order to improve feasibility of identifying these patients through detailed chart review.

METHODS

Patients with likely T2D were selected using a validated machine-learning (ML) algorithm applied to EHR data. "Typical" T2D cases were removed by excluding individuals with obesity, evidence of dyslipidemia, antibody-positive diabetes, or cystic fibrosis. To filter out likely type 1 diabetes (T1D) cases, we applied six additional "branch algorithms," relying on various clinical characteristics, which resulted in six overlapping cohorts. Diabetes type was classified by manual chart review as atypical, not atypical, or indeterminate due to missing information.

RESULTS

Of 114,975 biobank participants, the algorithms collectively identified 119 (0.1%) potential AD cases, of which 16 (0.014%) were confirmed after expert review. The branch algorithm that excluded T1D based on outpatient insulin use had the highest percentage yield of AD (13 of 27; 48.2% yield). Together, the 16 AD cases had significantly lower BMI and higher HDL than either unselected T1D or T2D cases identified by ML algorithms (P<0.05). Compared to the ML T1D group, the AD group had a significantly higher T2D polygenic score (P<0.01) and lower hemoglobin A1c (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our EHR-based algorithms followed by manual chart review identified collectively 16 individuals with AD, representing 0.22% of biobank enrollees with T2D. With a maximum yield of 48% cases after manual chart review, our algorithms have the potential to drastically improve efficiency of AD identification. Recognizing patients with AD may inform on the heterogeneity of T2D and facilitate enrollment in studies like the Rare and Atypical Diabetes Network (RADIANT).

摘要

目的

了解非典型糖尿病(AD)的形式可能会推进精准医学,但需要找到识别此类患者的方法。我们提出了一种基于电子健康记录(EHR)的算法方法,以识别可能患有 AD 的患者,特别是那些胰岛素充足、非代谢性糖尿病患者,以便通过详细的图表审查来提高识别这些患者的可行性。

方法

使用经过验证的机器学习(ML)算法从 EHR 数据中选择可能患有 T2D 的患者。通过排除肥胖、血脂异常证据、抗体阳性糖尿病或囊性纤维化的个体,去除“典型”T2D 病例。为了筛选出可能的 1 型糖尿病(T1D)病例,我们应用了六个额外的“分支算法”,依赖于各种临床特征,这导致了六个重叠的队列。通过手动图表审查将糖尿病类型分类为非典型、非非典型或由于信息缺失而不确定。

结果

在 114975 名生物库参与者中,该算法总共确定了 119 例(0.1%)潜在的 AD 病例,其中 16 例(0.014%)经专家审查后得到确认。基于门诊胰岛素使用排除 T1D 的分支算法的 AD 检出率最高(27 例中有 13 例;48.2%的检出率)。总的来说,与 ML 算法确定的未选择的 T1D 或 T2D 病例相比,16 例 AD 病例的 BMI 明显更低,HDL 更高(P<0.05)。与 ML T1D 组相比,AD 组的 T2D 多基因评分明显更高(P<0.01),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)明显更低(P<0.01)。

结论

我们的基于 EHR 的算法通过手动图表审查共识别出 16 名 AD 患者,占生物库中 T2D 患者的 0.22%。通过手动图表审查的最大检出率为 48%,我们的算法有可能大大提高 AD 识别的效率。识别 AD 患者可能有助于了解 T2D 的异质性,并促进在罕见和非典型糖尿病网络(RADIANT)等研究中招募患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/1ff4131dfa4e/pone.0278759.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/6bd2248f3866/pone.0278759.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/4c644e76a4dc/pone.0278759.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/1ff4131dfa4e/pone.0278759.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/6bd2248f3866/pone.0278759.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/4c644e76a4dc/pone.0278759.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eacd/9744270/1ff4131dfa4e/pone.0278759.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Algorithmic identification of atypical diabetes in electronic health record (EHR) systems.电子健康记录 (EHR) 系统中不典型糖尿病的算法识别。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278759. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of algorithms to classify type 1 and 2 diabetes according to age at diagnosis using electronic health records.开发和验证使用电子健康记录根据诊断时的年龄对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病进行分类的算法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00921-3.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A machine learning-based framework to identify type 2 diabetes through electronic health records.一种基于机器学习的通过电子健康记录识别2型糖尿病的框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
5
Algorithms for the identification of prevalent diabetes in the All of Us Research Program validated using polygenic scores - a new resource for diabetes precision medicine.利用多基因评分验证的“我们所有人研究计划”中常见糖尿病识别算法——糖尿病精准医学的新资源。
medRxiv. 2023 Sep 5:2023.09.05.23295061. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.05.23295061.
6
Utility of Polygenic Scores for Differentiating Diabetes Diagnosis Among Patients With Atypical Phenotypes of Diabetes.多基因评分在区分糖尿病患者非典型表型的诊断中的效用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Dec 21;109(1):107-113. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad456.
7
Determining diagnosis date of diabetes using structured electronic health record (EHR) data: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study.利用结构化电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据确定糖尿病的诊断日期:青少年糖尿病研究中的 SEARCH 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01394-8.
8
Factors Associated With Attainment of Glycemic Targets Among Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes in Canada: A Cross-sectional Study Using Primary and Specialty Care Electronic Medical Record Data.加拿大 1 型和 2 型糖尿病成人血糖达标相关因素的研究:基于初级和专科医疗电子病历数据的横断面研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2024 Feb;48(1):44-52.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
9
Clinical heterogeneity of type 1 diabetes (T1D) found in Asia.亚洲人群中 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的临床异质性。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 Oct;33(7). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2907. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Initial Validation of a Machine Learning-Derived Prognostic Test (KidneyIntelX) Integrating Biomarkers and Electronic Health Record Data To Predict Longitudinal Kidney Outcomes.基于机器学习的预后测试(KidneyIntelX)的初步验证,该测试整合了生物标志物和电子健康记录数据,以预测纵向肾脏结局。
Kidney360. 2020 Jun 30;1(8):731-739. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002252020. eCollection 2020 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of an Algorithm to Identify End-Stage Kidney Disease in Electronic Health Records Data.电子健康记录数据中识别终末期肾病算法的验证
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Aug;86(2):212-221.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.03.021. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
A Research Roadmap to Address the Heterogeneity of Diabetes and Advance Precision Medicine.应对糖尿病异质性并推进精准医学的研究路线图。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):601-610. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae844.
3
Association of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization.研究生物库中可操作基因组结果的返还:分析有效性、临床实施和资源利用。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Dec 2;108(12):2224-2237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Toward an Improved Classification of Type 2 Diabetes: Lessons From Research into the Heterogeneity of a Complex Disease.迈向 2 型糖尿病分类的改进:从复杂疾病异质性研究中得到的启示。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Nov 19;106(12):e4822-e4833. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab545.
3
Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program.
GLP-1 受体激动剂与 2 型糖尿病患者慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的相关性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 15;208(10):1088-1100. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0491OC.
美国国立卫生研究院生物医学高级研究与发展局(NHLBI)TOPMed 项目中对 53831 个不同基因组进行测序。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):290-299. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03205-y. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
Subtypes of Type 2 Diabetes Determined From Clinical Parameters.基于临床参数的 2 型糖尿病亚型。
Diabetes. 2020 Oct;69(10):2086-2093. doi: 10.2337/dbi20-0001. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.基于贝叶斯回归和连续收缩先验的多基因预测。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1776. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5.
6
Development and Standardization of an Improved Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score for Use in Newborn Screening and Incident Diagnosis.改良的 1 型糖尿病遗传风险评分的制定与标准化:用于新生儿筛查和发病诊断。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Feb;42(2):200-207. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1785.
7
Fine-mapping type 2 diabetes loci to single-variant resolution using high-density imputation and islet-specific epigenome maps.利用高密度基因分型和胰岛特异性表观基因组图谱对 2 型糖尿病位点进行精细映射到单变体分辨率。
Nat Genet. 2018 Nov;50(11):1505-1513. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0241-6. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
8
Type 2 diabetes genetic loci informed by multi-trait associations point to disease mechanisms and subtypes: A soft clustering analysis.多特征关联提示 2 型糖尿病遗传位点指向疾病机制和亚型:软聚类分析。
PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 21;15(9):e1002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002654. eCollection 2018 Sep.
9
Automated Diabetes Case Identification Using Electronic Health Record Data at a Tertiary Care Facility.在三级医疗机构中使用电子健康记录数据进行糖尿病病例的自动识别。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr 28;1(1):100-110. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2017.04.005. eCollection 2017 Jul.
10
Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes in Adults by Diabetes Type - United States, 2016.按糖尿病类型划分的美国成年人确诊糖尿病患病率,2016年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Mar 30;67(12):359-361. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6712a2.