• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用生殖正义视角增强在系统性代表性不足的育龄妇女中的研究参与度。

Applying a Reproductive Justice Lens to Enhance Research Engagement Among Systematically Underrepresented Childbearing Women.

作者信息

McGlothen-Bell Kelly, McGrath Jacqueline M, Brownell Elizabeth A, Shlafer Rebecca J, Crawford Allison D

出版信息

Nurs Res. 2023;72(2):132-140. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000639. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000639
PMID:36508567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Historically, childbearing women from diverse and systematically hard-to-reach populations have been excluded from nursing research. This practice limits the generalizability of findings. Maximizing research strategies to meet the unique needs of these populations must be a priority.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to provide methodological context for the comprehensive application of reproductive justice strategies to guide research methods and promote engagement of underrepresented childbearing women while decreasing systemic bias.

METHODS

In this article, we use a reproductive justice lens to characterize and define strategies for enhancing ethical and equitable engagement in research involving childbearing women who are often systematically underrepresented using a case study approach. Using a specific case study exemplar, the core tenets of reproductive justice are outlined and affirm the need to advance research strategies that create ethical engagement of diverse populations, transform oppressive social structures, and shift research paradigms so research objectives intentionally highlight the strengths and resiliency inherent to the targeted communities.

RESULTS

We begin by describing parallels between the tenets of reproductive justice and the ethical principles of research (i.e., respect for persons, beneficence, and justice). We then apply these tenets to conceptualization, implementation (recruitment, data management, and retention), and dissemination of research conducted with childbearing women from diverse backgrounds who are systemically underrepresented. We highlight our successful research strategies from our case study example of women with histories of incarceration.

DISCUSSION

To date, outcomes from our research indicate the need for multilevel strategies with a focus on respectful, inclusive participant and key community partner engagement; the time investment in local communities to promote equitable collaboration; encouragement of the patient's autonomous right to self-determination; and mitigation of power imbalances. Nurse researchers are well positioned to advance research justice at the intersection of reproductive justice and ethics to fully engage diverse populations in advancing health equity to support the best health outcomes.

摘要

背景

从历史上看,来自不同且系统性难以触及人群的育龄妇女被排除在护理研究之外。这种做法限制了研究结果的普遍性。将研究策略最大化以满足这些人群的独特需求必须成为优先事项。

目的

本研究的目的是提供方法背景,以便全面应用生殖正义策略来指导研究方法,并促进代表性不足的育龄妇女的参与,同时减少系统性偏见。

方法

在本文中,我们使用生殖正义视角,通过案例研究方法来描述和定义在涉及系统性代表性不足的育龄妇女的研究中加强道德和公平参与的策略。通过一个具体的案例研究范例,概述了生殖正义的核心原则,并肯定了推进研究策略的必要性,这些策略要实现不同人群的道德参与、改变压迫性社会结构以及转变研究范式,从而使研究目标有意突出目标社区固有的优势和复原力。

结果

我们首先描述生殖正义原则与研究伦理原则(即尊重人、行善和公正)之间的相似之处。然后,我们将这些原则应用于概念化、实施(招募、数据管理和保留)以及对来自不同背景且系统性代表性不足的育龄妇女进行的研究的传播。我们从有监禁史妇女的案例研究示例中突出了我们成功的研究策略。

讨论

迄今为止,我们的研究结果表明需要采取多层次策略,重点是尊重、包容参与者和关键社区伙伴的参与;在当地社区投入时间以促进公平合作;鼓励患者的自主自决权;以及减轻权力不平衡。护士研究人员处于有利地位,可在生殖正义与伦理的交叉点推进研究正义,以使不同人群充分参与以促进健康公平,从而支持最佳健康结果。

相似文献

1
Applying a Reproductive Justice Lens to Enhance Research Engagement Among Systematically Underrepresented Childbearing Women.运用生殖正义视角增强在系统性代表性不足的育龄妇女中的研究参与度。
Nurs Res. 2023;72(2):132-140. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000639. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
A decolonial and liberation lens to social justice research: Upholding promises for diverse, inclusive, and equitable psychological science.一种用于社会正义研究的去殖民化与解放视角:坚守为多元、包容且公平的心理科学许下的承诺。
Am Psychol. 2025 Jan;80(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/amp0001255. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3
Advancing Reproductive Justice to Close the Health Gap: A Call to Action for Social Work.推进生殖正义,缩小健康差距:社会工作的行动呼吁。
Soc Work. 2020 Oct 10;65(4):358-367. doi: 10.1093/sw/swaa034.
4
Complicating Narratives: Defining and Deconstructing Ethical Challenges in Community Psychology.复杂的叙事:定义和解构社区心理学中的伦理挑战。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):491-501. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12177. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
5
Ethical considerations for conducting sexual and reproductive health research with female adolescents engaged in high-risk behaviours in China.在中国,对从事高风险行为的青春期少女进行性与生殖健康研究的伦理考量。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Jun;20:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Ethical Considerations of Social Media to Recruit Caregivers of Children With Cancer.社交媒体招募癌症患儿照顾者的伦理考虑
Nurs Res. 2021 Jan/Feb;70(1):67-71. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000473.
8
Ethical Imperatives for Working With Diverse Populations in Digital Research.与数字研究中的不同人群合作的伦理准则。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e47884. doi: 10.2196/47884.
9
Challenges and opportunities faced by nurse scientists in integrating data and technology in research to promote health equity.护士科学家在将数据和技术整合到研究中以促进健康公平方面面临的挑战和机遇。
Nurs Outlook. 2023 May-Jun;71(3):101958. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101958. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
10
Justice System Reform for Health Equity: A Mixed Methods Examination of Collaborating for Equity and Justice Principles in a Grassroots Organizing Coalition.促进健康公平的司法系统改革:对基层组织联盟中公平与正义原则协作的混合方法研究
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(1_suppl):62S-70S. doi: 10.1177/1090198119859411.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of social determinants of health on infant and maternal health using a reproductive justice lens.从生殖正义视角看健康的社会决定因素对母婴健康的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 May 16;25(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07693-y.
2
Perinatal Health Outcomes Among Women on Community Supervision: A Scoping Review.社区监管下的妇女围产期健康结局:范围综述。
J Correct Health Care. 2024 Aug;30(4):245-256. doi: 10.1089/jchc.23.09.0073. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
3
Exploration of the effects of incarceration on the health of Latina women and their children using the life course theory.
运用生命历程理论探究监禁对拉美裔妇女及其子女健康的影响。
Public Health Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;41(2):264-273. doi: 10.1111/phn.13273. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Race and Ethnicity of Infants Enrolled in Neonatal Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.种族和民族的婴儿参加新生儿临床试验:系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2348882. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48882.