Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 15;49(2):339-349. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac163.
Around 20% of people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis later develop a psychotic disorder, but it is difficult to predict who this will be. We assessed the incidence of hearing speech (termed speech illusions [SIs]) in noise in CHR participants and examined whether this was associated with adverse clinical outcomes.
At baseline, 344 CHR participants and 67 healthy controls were presented with a computerized white noise task and asked whether they heard speech, and whether speech was neutral, affective, or whether they were uncertain about its valence. After 2 years, we assessed whether participants transitioned to psychosis, or remitted from the CHR state, and their functioning.
CHR participants had a lower sensitivity to the task. Logistic regression revealed that a bias towards hearing targets in stimuli was associated with remission status (OR = 0.21, P = 042). Conversely, hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline was associated with reduced likelihood of remission (OR = 7.72. P = .007). When we assessed only participants who did not take antipsychotic medication at baseline, the association between hearing SIs with uncertain valence at baseline and remission likelihood remained (OR = 7.61, P = .043) and this variable was additionally associated with a greater likelihood of transition to psychosis (OR = 5.34, P = .029).
In CHR individuals, a tendency to hear speech in noise, and uncertainty about the affective valence of this speech, is associated with adverse outcomes. This task could be used in a battery of cognitive markers to stratify CHR participants according to subsequent outcomes.
大约 20%处于精神病临床高风险(CHR)的人群随后会发展为精神病,但很难预测谁会这样。我们评估了 CHR 参与者在噪声中听到言语(称为言语错觉[SI])的发生率,并研究了这是否与不良临床结局有关。
在基线时,344 名 CHR 参与者和 67 名健康对照者接受了计算机化白噪声任务,并被问及他们是否听到了言语,以及言语是中性的、情感的,还是他们不确定其情感。2 年后,我们评估了参与者是否向精神病转变,或从 CHR 状态缓解,以及他们的功能。
CHR 参与者对任务的敏感性较低。逻辑回归显示,对刺激中目标的偏见与缓解状态相关(OR=0.21,P=0.042)。相反,基线时听到具有不确定情感的 SI 与缓解可能性降低相关(OR=7.72,P=0.007)。当我们仅评估基线时未服用抗精神病药物的参与者时,基线时听到具有不确定情感的 SI 与缓解可能性之间的关联仍然存在(OR=7.61,P=0.043),并且该变量与向精神病转变的可能性增加相关(OR=5.34,P=0.029)。
在 CHR 个体中,倾向于在噪声中听到言语,以及对言语情感的不确定性,与不良结局相关。这项任务可以在认知标志物的电池中使用,根据随后的结果对 CHR 参与者进行分层。