Albillos Agustín, Krag Aleksander
Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Centre for Liver Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital Odense, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
J Hepatol. 2023 Apr;78(4):866-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
For decades, non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) have been the standard of care for the primary and secondary prevention of bleeding from oesophageal varices. However, several questions regarding the best clinical use of NSBBs remain unanswered and new data continue to emerge. Herein, we aim to delineate the therapeutic window of NSBBs in cirrhosis from a more individualised perspective. We address the current controversy of widening the therapeutic window and prescribing NSBBs to all patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. Although transient elastography is useful to rule-in clinically significant portal hypertension, we lack robust data supporting the use of NSBBs in patients without varices. While most data are based on propranolol, accumulating evidence suggests that carvedilol is superior and should be the first-line treatment until the decompensated stage. The clinical risk-to-benefit ratio appears to deteriorate in advanced decompensated stages and the risk of harm is high in patients with refractory ascites, low blood pressure and renal impairment, which clinically define closure of the therapeutic window. We also critically review non-invasive surrogates and biomarkers for predicting the haemodynamic response to NSBBs and confirm that the absence of reliable non-invasive methods is one of the main challenges facing the field.
几十年来,非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)一直是食管静脉曲张出血一级和二级预防的标准治疗方法。然而,关于NSBBs最佳临床应用的几个问题仍未得到解答,新数据也不断涌现。在此,我们旨在从更个体化的角度阐明NSBBs在肝硬化中的治疗窗。我们探讨了扩大治疗窗并给所有具有临床显著门静脉高压的患者开具NSBBs这一当前争议。虽然瞬时弹性成像有助于确诊临床显著门静脉高压,但我们缺乏支持在无静脉曲张患者中使用NSBBs的有力数据。虽然大多数数据基于普萘洛尔,但越来越多的证据表明卡维地洛更具优势,在失代偿期之前应作为一线治疗药物。在晚期失代偿阶段,临床风险效益比似乎会恶化,在难治性腹水、低血压和肾功能损害患者中危害风险很高,这些在临床上界定了治疗窗的关闭。我们还批判性地审视了用于预测对NSBBs血流动力学反应的非侵入性替代指标和生物标志物,并确认缺乏可靠的非侵入性方法是该领域面临的主要挑战之一。