Shalganov Tchavdar, Stoyanov Milko, Traykov Vassil
Department of Cardiology, National Heart Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Department of Cardiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 30;9:1063147. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1063147. eCollection 2022.
Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) can improve outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Data on patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy are scarce. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare early CA for VT to deferred or no ablation in patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Studies were selected according to the following PICOS criteria: patients with structural heart disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for VT, regardless of the antiarrhythmic drug treatment; intervention-early CA; comparison-no or deferred CA; outcomes-any appropriate ICD therapy, appropriate ICD shocks, all-cause mortality, VT storm, cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular hospitalizations, complications, quality of life; published randomized trials with follow-up ≥12 months. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed. Outcomes were assessed using aggregate study-level data and reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stratification by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also done. Eight trials ( = 1,076) met the criteria. Early ablation was associated with reduced incidence of ICD therapy (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.83, = 0.005), shocks (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77, = 0.001), VT storm (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.85, = 0.006), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92, = 0.01). All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, complications, and quality of life were not different. Stratification by LVEF showed a reduction of ICD therapy only with higher EF (high EF OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, = 0.01 vs. low EF OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.12, = 0.11), while ICD shocks (high EF OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.15, = 0.11 vs. low EF OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83, = 0.008) and hospitalizations (high EF OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.58-1.58, = 0.85 vs. low EF OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.82, = 0.002) were reduced only in patients with lower EF.
Early CA for VT in patients with structural heart disease is associated with reduced incidence of ICD therapy and shocks, VT storm, and hospitalizations. There is no impact on mortality, complications, and quality of life. (The review protocol was registered with INPLASY on June 19, 2022, #202260080).
[https://inplasy.com/], identifier [202260080].
导管消融术(CA)治疗室性心动过速(VT)可改善缺血性心肌病患者的预后。关于非缺血性心肌病患者的数据较少。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较缺血性或非缺血性心肌病患者早期CA治疗VT与延迟或不进行消融治疗的效果。
根据以下PICOS标准选择研究:患有结构性心脏病且因VT植入植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的患者,无论抗心律失常药物治疗情况如何;干预措施为早期CA;对照为不进行或延迟CA;结局指标为任何适当的ICD治疗、适当的ICD电击、全因死亡率、VT风暴、心血管死亡率、心血管住院、并发症、生活质量;已发表的随访时间≥12个月的随机试验。进行随机效应荟萃分析。使用汇总的研究水平数据评估结局指标,并报告为比值比(OR)或95%置信区间(CI)的均值差。还按左心室射血分数(LVEF)进行分层。八项试验(n = 1,076)符合标准。早期消融与ICD治疗发生率降低相关(OR 0.53,95%CI 0.33 - 0.83,P = 0.005)、电击次数减少(OR 0.52,95%CI 0.35 - 0.77,P = 0.001)、VT风暴减少(OR 0.58,95%CI 0.39 - 0.85,P = 0.006)以及心血管住院次数减少(OR 0.67,95%CI 0.49 - 0.92,P = 0.01)。全因和心血管死亡率、并发症及生活质量无差异。按LVEF分层显示,仅在较高EF值时ICD治疗减少(高EF值时OR 0.40,95%CI 0.20 - 0.80,P = 0.01,低EF值时OR 0.62,95%CI 0.34 - 1.12,P = 0.11),而ICD电击(高EF值时OR 0.54,95%CI 0.25 - 1.15,P = 0.11,低EF值时OR 0.50,95%CI 0.30 - 0.83,P = 0.008)和住院次数(高EF值时OR 0.95,95%CI 0.58 - 1.58,P = 0.85,低EF值时OR 0.58,95%CI 0.40 - 0.82,P = 0.002)仅在较低EF值的患者中减少。
结构性心脏病患者早期CA治疗VT与ICD治疗发生率、电击次数、VT风暴及住院次数减少相关。对死亡率、并发症及生活质量无影响。(该综述方案于2022年6月19日在INPLASY注册,#202260080)。