Stuart-Harris R, Simes R J, Coates A S, Raghavan D, Devine R, Tattersall M H
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Sydney Branch), N.S.W., Australia.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1987 May;23(5):557-61. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(87)90320-8.
Twenty-two patients with advanced breast cancer participated in a randomized cross-over study of one cycle each of doxorubicin followed 3 weeks later by mitozantrone or vice versa. Before further treatment, patients selected which drug they wished to continue. Of 18 patients completing the study, 13 chose to continue mitozantrone, 2 doxorubicin and 3 had no preference (P = 0.007). Patients were told to assume similar efficacy of the two drugs and drug preference was based primarily on side-effects. Patient self-assessment of quality of life and physician assigned toxicity scores both indicated that nausea and vomiting, appetite and alopecia were significantly worse following doxorubicin than after mitozantrone. Except for alopecia, no significant period or carry-over effects were noted although the power of the study to detect such interactions was low. This study design may prove useful in enabling patients to select their preference between two treatments of similar efficacy.
22例晚期乳腺癌患者参与了一项随机交叉研究,分别接受一个周期的阿霉素治疗,3周后再接受米托蒽醌治疗,或者顺序相反。在进一步治疗前,患者选择他们希望继续使用的药物。在完成研究的18例患者中,13例选择继续使用米托蒽醌,2例选择阿霉素,3例无偏好(P = 0.007)。告知患者两种药物疗效相似,药物偏好主要基于副作用。患者的生活质量自我评估和医生评定的毒性评分均表明,阿霉素治疗后的恶心、呕吐、食欲及脱发情况比米托蒽醌治疗后明显更严重。除脱发外,未观察到显著的周期或残留效应,尽管该研究检测此类相互作用的效能较低。这种研究设计可能有助于患者在两种疗效相似的治疗方法之间做出偏好选择。