Lawton P A, Spittle M F, Ostrowski M J, Young T, Madden F, Folkes A, Hill B T, MacRae K
CRC Gray Laboratory, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1993;5(2):80-4. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(05)80851-9.
Between July 1985 and December 1987, 87 patients with advanced breast carcinoma were randomized to receive single agent doxorubicin (70 mg/m2), epirubicin (70 mg/m2) or mitozantrone (14 mg/m2) at 3-weekly intervals. The patients had received no previous chemotherapy for their advanced disease but 91% had received prior hormonal therapy. The response rates were 36% with doxorubicin, 32% with epirubicin and 26% with mitozantrone, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. The median survival of all patients was 8.3 months. There was no significant difference in response rates or survival according to menopausal status. The toxicities of the three agents are compared. Nausea, vomiting and alopecia were more severe in patients treated with doxorubicin or epirubicin than those treated with mitozantrone. Myelosuppression and infective episodes occurred more frequently with mitozantrone. Two cardiac complications were reported. This study shows that the toxicity and low efficacy of all three agents limit their use as single agents in advanced breast carcinoma. The role of single agent chemotherapy and the relative toxicities of these drugs are discussed.
1985年7月至1987年12月期间,87例晚期乳腺癌患者被随机分组,接受单药阿霉素(70mg/m²)、表柔比星(70mg/m²)或米托蒽醌(14mg/m²)治疗,每3周给药一次。这些患者之前未接受过针对晚期疾病的化疗,但91%的患者曾接受过激素治疗。阿霉素的有效率为36%,表柔比星为32%,米托蒽醌为26%,但这些差异未达到统计学显著性。所有患者的中位生存期为8.3个月。根据绝经状态,有效率或生存期无显著差异。对这三种药物的毒性进行了比较。接受阿霉素或表柔比星治疗的患者恶心、呕吐和脱发比接受米托蒽醌治疗的患者更严重。米托蒽醌导致的骨髓抑制和感染性发作更频繁。报告了两例心脏并发症。本研究表明,这三种药物的毒性和低疗效限制了它们在晚期乳腺癌中作为单药的应用。讨论了单药化疗的作用以及这些药物的相对毒性。