• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心经验:Cook Zilver PTX 在股腘动脉区间的真实世界结局。

Real-world outcomes of Cook Zilver PTX in femoro-popliteal district from multicenter experience.

机构信息

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy -

Unit of Vascular Surgery, Department of General and Specialist Surgery, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Int Angiol. 2023 Feb;42(1):9-18. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04959-8. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

DOI:10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04959-8
PMID:36534022
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose is to evaluate the follow-up outcomes after femoro-popliteal stenting with Cook Zilver PTX in a multicenter experience.

METHODS

Collected data from four Units were retrospectively joined and analyzed considering Zilver PTX deployed from August 2009 according to the instruction for use. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, Rutherford classification, arterial characteristics and stent data were considered. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as reintervention performed for ≥50% diameter stenosis after recurrent clinical symptoms. Primary outcome was the freedom from TLR (ffTLR) and its risk factors. Secondary outcomes were primary patency (PP) of the stent, amputation-free survival (AFS) and their risk factors.

RESULTS

Considering 203 patients (mean age: 73.5 years ±10.6; male: 66.5%) and 263 stents (median 2 stents/patient, range 1-5stent/patient), chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) affected 154 patients (75.9%). The length of the treated lesion was <120 mm in 99 (48.8%), ≥120 mm and <200 mm in 65 (32%) and ≥200 mm in 39 (19.2%) cases, respectively; the reference vessel mean diameter was 5.5±0.7 mm; chronic total occlusion was treated in 153 (75.4%) patients, the popliteal artery was involved in 56 (27.6%) cases and prior endovascular intervention was performed in 27 (13.3%) cases. Two or more crural run-off vessels were patent in 124 (61.1%). Mean follow-up was 23.2 months ±21.3. At 1, 2 and 3 years, the ffTLR was 90.6±4.2%, 86.4±6.1% and 80.4±8.3%, respectively, and the PP was 85.6±5.0%, 74.2±7.6% and 72.7±8.2%, respectively. Negative prognostic factor for ffTLR and PP was the reference vessel diameter (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). At 1, 2 and 3 years, the AFS was 81.8±6.0%, 75.5±7.1% and 74.2±7.5% respectively; coronary artery disease (P=0.041) and CLTI (P=0.011) resulted negative prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world practice, around 3/4 of patients were treated for CLTI. The rate of ffTLR is high, and PP is substantially lower. A small vessel diameter (<5 mm) is a negative factor for both ffTLR and PP. The rate of AFS is about 75% at 2 years and CLTI and coronary artery disease are negative prognostic factors.

摘要

背景

目的是评估在多中心经验中使用 Cook Zilver PTX 进行股腘动脉支架置入后的随访结果。

方法

回顾性收集四个单位的数据,根据使用说明,考虑自 2009 年 8 月起部署 Zilver PTX。考虑患者人口统计学、术前合并症、Rutherford 分类、动脉特征和支架数据。靶病变血运重建(TLR)定义为复发性临床症状后进行≥50%直径狭窄的再介入。主要结果是无 TLR (ffTLR)及其危险因素。次要结果是支架的原发性通畅率(PP)、无截肢生存率(AFS)及其危险因素。

结果

考虑 203 例患者(平均年龄:73.5 岁±10.6;男性:66.5%)和 263 个支架(中位数 2 个支架/患者,范围 1-5 个支架/患者),慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)影响 154 例患者(75.9%)。治疗病变的长度<120mm 的患者有 99 例(48.8%),≥120mm 和<200mm 的患者有 65 例(32%),≥200mm 的患者有 39 例(19.2%);参考血管平均直径为 5.5±0.7mm;153 例(75.4%)患者治疗慢性完全闭塞,56 例(27.6%)患者累及腘动脉,27 例(13.3%)患者行腔内治疗前。124 例(61.1%)患者有两条或两条以上的小腿流出血管通畅。平均随访时间为 23.2 个月±21.3。在 1、2 和 3 年时,ffTLR 分别为 90.6±4.2%、86.4±6.1%和 80.4±8.3%,PP 分别为 85.6±5.0%、74.2±7.6%和 72.7±8.2%。ffTLR 和 PP 的负预后因素是参考血管直径(P=0.001 和 P<0.001)。在 1、2 和 3 年时,AFS 分别为 81.8±6.0%、75.5±7.1%和 74.2±7.5%;冠心病(P=0.041)和 CLTI(P=0.011)是负预后因素。

结论

在真实世界的实践中,约 3/4 的患者接受 CLTI 治疗。ffTLR 的发生率较高,而 PP 则明显降低。小血管直径(<5mm)是 ffTLR 和 PP 的负危险因素。AFS 的 2 年发生率约为 75%,CLTI 和冠心病是负预后因素。

相似文献

1
Real-world outcomes of Cook Zilver PTX in femoro-popliteal district from multicenter experience.多中心经验:Cook Zilver PTX 在股腘动脉区间的真实世界结局。
Int Angiol. 2023 Feb;42(1):9-18. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04959-8. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
2
Prediction Model for Freedom from TLR from a Multi-study Analysis of Long-Term Results with the Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Peripheral Stent.基于Zilver PTX药物洗脱外周支架长期结果多研究分析的无靶病变血运重建预测模型
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):196-206. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02648-6. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Clinical outcomes of polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated stents vs stent grafts in peripheral arterial disease patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions.在股腘动脉病变的外周动脉疾病患者中,无聚合物、紫杉醇涂层支架与支架移植物的临床结局比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jun;73(6):1998-2008.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.061. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Real-World Performance of Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Bare Metal Stenting (Zilver PTX) for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.紫杉醇药物洗脱裸金属支架(Zilver PTX)治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的真实世界疗效
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions.ZILVERPASS 研究:在股浅动脉病变中 ZILVER PTX 支架与旁路手术的比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):287-295. doi: 10.1177/1526602820902014. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
6
A single center experience of Zilver PTX for femoro-popliteal lesions.关于Zilver PTX治疗股腘病变的单中心经验。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Zilver PTX Post-market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 2-Year Results.日本紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗股腘动脉疾病的Zilver PTX上市后监测研究:2年结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 Mar;42(3):358-364. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2110-1. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Clinical Outcome of Drug-Eluted Stenting (Zilver PTX) in Patients With Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease a Single Center Experience.药物洗脱支架(Zilver PTX)治疗股腘动脉闭塞性疾病的临床疗效:单中心经验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):350-360. doi: 10.1177/15266028211049339. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
Randomized clinical Trial Comparing drug Eluting Stent Zilver PTX® Versus Bare Metal Stent Zilver Flex® for Treatment of Lesions in Femoral and Popliteal Arteries in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia.随机临床试验比较药物洗脱支架 Zilver PTX®与裸金属支架 Zilver Flex®治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者股动脉和腘动脉病变。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023 Oct;57(7):706-716. doi: 10.1177/15385744231171746. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) compared to Zilver PTX for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention.紫杉醇洗脱支架(Eluvia)与 Zilver PTX 用于血管内股腘动脉介入治疗的成本效益比较。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):880-887. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2088965.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of one-year clinically driven revascularization following endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions.孤立性动脉粥样硬化性腘动脉病变血管内治疗后一年临床驱动性血运重建的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17283-9.