Jara-García F, Diranzo-García J, Estrems-Díaz V, Sánchez-Losilla C, Fuentes-Real S, Hernández-Ferrando L
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2023 Mar-Apr;67(2):T94-T101. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems.
To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used.
We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analysed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilisation of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications.
The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant.
The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.
髋臼翻修手术是一项具有挑战性的外科手术,尤其是当出现复杂的骨缺损时。这使得植入物的初次固定和骨整合变得困难,进而导致并发症的出现。小梁钛植入物试图解决这些问题。
在一系列37例采用小梁钛杯-笼翻修植入物治疗Paprosky IIIA和IIIB型骨缺损的髋臼翻修手术中,评估我们的临床-放射学结果、植入物的存活率以及中期并发症的出现情况。
我们对2011年至2019年间37例髋臼复杂缺损(20例IIIA型和17例IIIB型,其中5例伴有骨盆连续性中断)的病例进行了观察性、描述性和回顾性研究,这些病例的髋臼组件被小梁钛杯替代。我们分析了临床结果(疼痛和功能)、放射学参数(髋关节旋转中心的恢复和植入物的活动度)以及并发症的出现情况。
平均随访时间为61个月。我们在Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel功能量表上获得了中位数为8分的改善,在患者疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)上获得了6分的改善。我们记录了2例髋臼松动、1例脱位和3例手术伤口感染,但未影响植入物。
在髋臼复杂缺损的髋臼翻修手术中,使用小梁钛杯-笼植入物可能是一种有效的选择,在临床和放射学结果以及植入物的并发症和存活率方面表现良好,主要是由于其良好的初次固定和随后的骨整合。