• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在后种族灭绝背景下支持亲社会违规行为的认知机制。

On the cognitive mechanisms supporting prosocial disobedience in a post-genocidal context.

机构信息

The Moral and Social Brain Lab, Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan, 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Center for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26460-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-26460-z
PMID:36536035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9763397/
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to offer a first investigation of the neuro-cognitive processes and the temporal dynamics at the neural level, together with cultural, social and psychological dimensions, that may support resistance to orders to harm another person. Using a novel experimental approach to study experimentally disobedience, we recruited individuals from the first generation born after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Seventy-two were recruited and tested in Rwanda and 72 were recruited and tested in Belgium. Results indicated that a higher neural response to the pain of others and a higher feeling of responsibility when people obeyed orders were associated with more resistance to immoral orders. We also observed that participants who had a higher processing, as measured through mid-frontal theta activity, when listening to the orders of the experimenter disobeyed less frequently to immoral orders. Further, participants experiencing a higher conflict before administering a shock to the 'victim' also disobeyed more frequently to immoral orders. Finally, a low cultural relationship to authority and a high estimated family suffering during the genocide were also associated with more disobedience to immoral orders. The present study opens new paths for interdisciplinary field research dedicated to the study of obedience.

摘要

本研究旨在从神经认知过程和神经水平的时间动态,以及文化、社会和心理维度,对抵抗伤害他人的命令进行首次调查。通过一种新的实验方法来研究实验性的不服从,我们招募了在 1994 年卢旺达种族灭绝后出生的第一代人。在卢旺达招募并测试了 72 人,在比利时招募并测试了 72 人。结果表明,当人们服从命令时,对他人痛苦的神经反应越高,责任感越强,对不道德命令的抵制就越强。我们还观察到,当参与者在听从实验者的命令时,额区θ频段活动的处理水平较高,他们对不道德命令的不服从程度也较低。此外,在给“受害者”电击前经历较高冲突的参与者,也更频繁地不服从不道德的命令。最后,与权威的低文化关系和种族灭绝期间家庭遭受的高估计也与对不道德命令的更高程度的不服从有关。本研究为致力于研究服从的跨学科领域研究开辟了新的道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/13ab668764b0/41598_2022_26460_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/525d0916ae5d/41598_2022_26460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/9292af114826/41598_2022_26460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/78b6fd4fce1b/41598_2022_26460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/13ab668764b0/41598_2022_26460_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/525d0916ae5d/41598_2022_26460_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/9292af114826/41598_2022_26460_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/78b6fd4fce1b/41598_2022_26460_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a325/9763397/13ab668764b0/41598_2022_26460_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On the cognitive mechanisms supporting prosocial disobedience in a post-genocidal context.在后种族灭绝背景下支持亲社会违规行为的认知机制。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 19;12(1):21875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26460-z.
2
A novel electroencephalography-based paradigm to measure intergroup prosociality: An intergenerational study in the aftermath of the genocide against Tutsis in Rwanda.一种基于脑电的测量群体间亲社会行为的新范式:在卢旺达对图西族的种族灭绝事件之后的代际研究。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jan;153(1):241-254. doi: 10.1037/xge0001480. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
3
Obedience to authority reduces cognitive conflict before an action.权威服从减少了行动前的认知冲突。
Soc Neurosci. 2024 Apr;19(2):94-105. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2024.2376049. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
4
"We are the memory representation of our parents": Intergenerational legacies of genocide among descendants of rape survivors in Rwanda.“我们是父母的记忆体现”:卢旺达强奸幸存者后代中种族灭绝的代际遗产。
Torture. 2018;28(3):30-45. doi: 10.7146/torture.v28i3.111183.
5
The Intergenerational Legacy of Genocidal Rape: The Realities and Perspectives of Children Born of the Rwandan Genocide.种族灭绝式强奸的代际遗产:卢旺达种族灭绝幸存者子女的现实与视角
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Sep;35(17-18):3286-3307. doi: 10.1177/0886260517708407. Epub 2017 May 15.
6
"We are children like others": Pathways to mental health and healing for children born of genocidal rape in Rwanda.“我们和其他人一样都是孩子”:卢旺达种族灭绝强奸所生孩子的心理健康和疗愈之路。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;56(3):510-528. doi: 10.1177/1363461519825683. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Double Jeopardy: Young adult mental and physical health outcomes following conception via genocidal rape during the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda.双重困境:1994年卢旺达针对图西族的种族灭绝期间,通过种族灭绝性强奸受孕后青少年的身心健康状况
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;278:113938. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113938. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Twenty years later, the cognitive portrait of openness to reconciliation in Rwanda.二十年后,卢旺达对和解的认知特征。
Br J Psychol. 2018 May;109(2):362-385. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12275. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Transgenerational trauma in Rwandan genocidal rape survivors and their children: A culturally enhanced bioecological approach.卢旺达种族灭绝强奸幸存者及其子女的代际创伤:一种文化增强型生物生态方法。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;59(6):727-739. doi: 10.1177/13634615221080231. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
A novel experimental approach to study disobedience to authority.一种研究违抗权威行为的新颖实验方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 25;11(1):22927. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02334-8.

引用本文的文献

1
When the brain says "No!": An MRI study on the neural correlates of resistance to immoral orders.当大脑说“不!”:一项关于抗拒不道德命令的神经关联的磁共振成像研究
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Dec 19;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00392. eCollection 2024.
2
Neuro-cognitive specificities in prosocial disobedience: A comparative fMRI study of civilian and military populations.亲社会不服从行为中的神经认知特异性:一项针对平民和军人的fMRI对比研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 22;20(7):e0328407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328407. eCollection 2025.
3
A cross-cultural EEG study of how obedience and conformity influence reconciliation intentions.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuromodulation of the right temporoparietal junction alters amygdala functional connectivity to authority pressure.右侧颞顶交界处的神经调节改变了杏仁核对权威压力的功能连接。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Dec 15;43(18):5605-5615. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26037. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
Commanding or Being a Simple Intermediary: How Does It Affect Moral Behavior and Related Brain Mechanisms?发令或仅仅作为简单中介:这如何影响道德行为和相关大脑机制?
eNeuro. 2022 Oct 17;9(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0508-21.2022. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
3
A novel experimental approach to study disobedience to authority.
一项关于服从和从众如何影响和解意愿的跨文化脑电图研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 22;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf038.
4
A systematic review of mobile brain/body imaging studies using the P300 event-related potentials to investigate cognition beyond the laboratory.一项使用 P300 事件相关电位的移动脑/身成像研究的系统评价,旨在探索实验室之外的认知。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;24(4):631-659. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01190-z. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
一种研究违抗权威行为的新颖实验方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 25;11(1):22927. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02334-8.
4
The obedient mind and the volitional brain: A neural basis for preserved sense of agency and sense of responsibility under coercion.顺从的思维和意志的大脑:在胁迫下保持代理感和责任感的神经基础。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0258884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258884. eCollection 2021.
5
The effect of military training on the sense of agency and outcome processing.军事训练对主体感和结果加工的影响。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 31;11(1):4366. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18152-x.
6
Obeying orders reduces vicarious brain activation towards victims' pain.服从命令会减少对受害者痛苦的替代性大脑激活。
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 15;222:117251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117251. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Motivated misremembering of selfish decisions.出于自利目的而产生的错误记忆。
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 29;11(1):2100. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15602-4.
8
Beta Oscillations Distinguish Between Two Forms of Mental Imagery While Gamma and Theta Activity Reflects Auditory Attention.β振荡可区分两种形式的心理意象,而γ和θ活动反映听觉注意力。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Sep 25;12:389. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00389. eCollection 2018.
9
Only giving orders? An experimental study of the sense of agency when giving or receiving commands.只发号施令?给予或接收命令时主体感的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0204027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204027. eCollection 2018.
10
Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research.元分析 ERP 研究中的疼痛共情强调了 ERP 研究中的方法学问题。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Oct 25;13(10):1003-1017. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy072.