Iankilevitch Maria, Singh Gurjit, Russo Frank A
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ear Hear. 2023;44(3):460-476. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001311. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
Given the low rates of hearing aid adoption among individuals with hearing loss, it is imperative to better understand the decision-making processes leading to greater hearing aid uptake. A careful analysis of the existing literature on theoretical approaches to studying these processes is needed to help researchers frame hypotheses and methodology in studies on audiology. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review with two aims. First, we examine theories that have been used to study research on hearing aid adoption. Second, we propose additional theories from the behavioral sciences that have not yet been used to examine hearing aid uptake but that can inform future research.
We identified peer-reviewed publications whose research was driven by one or more theoretical approaches by searching through PubMed, ProQuest PsycINFO, CINHAL Plus, Web of Science, Scopus, and OVID Medline/Embase/PsycINFO. The publications were examined by two researchers for eligibility.
Twenty-three papers were included in the analysis. The most common theoretical approaches studied include the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, Self-Determination Theory, and the COM-B Model. Seven other theoretical frameworks based on cognitive psychology and behavioral economics have also appeared in the literature. In addition, we propose considering nudge theory, framing effect, prospect theory, social learning theory, social identity theory, dual process theories, and affective-based theories of decision making when studying hearing aid adoption.
We conclude that, although a number of theories have been considered in research on hearing aid uptake, there are considerable methodological limitations to their use. Furthermore, the field can benefit greatly from the inclusion of novel theoretical approaches drawn from outside of audiology.
鉴于听力损失患者中助听器的采用率较低,必须更好地了解导致更高助听器采用率的决策过程。需要仔细分析现有关于研究这些过程的理论方法的文献,以帮助研究人员在听力学研究中构建假设和方法。因此,我们进行了一项范围综述,有两个目的。第一,我们研究已用于助听器采用研究的理论。第二,我们提出行为科学中尚未用于研究助听器采用但可为未来研究提供信息的其他理论。
我们通过搜索PubMed、ProQuest PsycINFO、CINHAL Plus、Web of Science、Scopus和OVID Medline/Embase/PsycINFO,确定了其研究由一种或多种理论方法驱动的同行评审出版物。两名研究人员对这些出版物进行了资格审查。
分析纳入了23篇论文。研究的最常见理论方法包括健康信念模型、行为改变的跨理论模型、自我决定理论和COM-B模型。基于认知心理学和行为经济学的其他七个理论框架也出现在文献中。此外,我们建议在研究助听器采用时考虑助推理论、框架效应、前景理论、社会学习理论、社会认同理论、双过程理论和基于情感的决策理论。
我们得出结论,尽管在助听器采用研究中已经考虑了许多理论,但它们的使用存在相当大的方法学局限性。此外,该领域可以从纳入听力学之外的新理论方法中受益匪浅。