Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 20;17(12):e0279347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279347. eCollection 2022.
Risk compensation, or matching behavior to a perceived level of acceptable risk, can blunt the effectiveness of public health interventions. One area of possible risk compensation during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is antibody testing. While antibody tests are imperfect measures of immunity, results may influence risk perception and individual preventive actions. We conducted a randomized control trial to assess whether receiving antibody test results changed SARS-CoV-2 protective behaviors.
Assess whether objective information about antibody status, particularly for those who are antibody negative and likely still susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, increases protective behaviors. Secondarily, assess whether a positive antibody test results in decreased protective behaviors.
In September 2020, we enrolled 1076 undergraduate students, used fingerstick tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and randomized participants to receive their results immediately or delayed by 4 weeks. Two weeks later, participants completed a survey about their engagement in 4 protective behaviors (mask use, social event avoidance, staying home from work/school, ensuring physical distancing). We estimated differences between conditions for each of these behaviors, stratified by antibody status. For negative participants at baseline, we also estimated the difference between conditions for seroconversion over 8 weeks of follow-up.
For the antibody negative participants (n = 1029) and antibody positive participants (n = 47), we observed no significant differences in protective behavior engagement between those who were randomized to receive test results immediately or after 4 weeks. For the baseline antibody negative participants, we also observed no difference in seroconversion outcomes between conditions.
We found that receiving antibody test results did not lead to significant behavior change in undergraduate students whether the SARS-CoV-2 antibody result was positive or negative.
风险补偿,即根据可接受风险的感知水平调整行为,可以削弱公共卫生干预措施的效果。在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,抗体检测可能是一个风险补偿的领域。虽然抗体检测不能完美地衡量免疫水平,但检测结果可能会影响风险感知和个人预防措施。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估接受抗体检测结果是否会改变 SARS-CoV-2 的保护行为。
评估客观的抗体状况信息,特别是对于那些抗体阴性且可能仍然易感染 SARS-CoV-2 的人,是否会增加保护行为。其次,评估阳性抗体检测结果是否会导致保护行为减少。
2020 年 9 月,我们招募了 1076 名本科生,使用指尖采血检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体,并将参与者随机分为立即或延迟 4 周接受检测结果。2 周后,参与者完成了一份关于他们在 4 种保护行为(戴口罩、避免社交活动、不上班/上学、保持身体距离)中参与程度的调查。我们根据抗体状况对每一种行为在两种条件下的差异进行了估计。对于基线时抗体阴性的参与者,我们还估计了在 8 周随访期间,两种条件下的血清转化差异。
对于抗体阴性参与者(n=1029)和抗体阳性参与者(n=47),我们观察到在立即或延迟 4 周接受检测结果的条件下,保护行为的参与率没有显著差异。对于基线时抗体阴性的参与者,我们也没有观察到两种条件下血清转化结果的差异。
我们发现,无论 SARS-CoV-2 抗体结果是阳性还是阴性,接受抗体检测结果并没有导致本科生的行为发生显著变化。