Suppr超能文献

碳正离子量子化学方法的全面基准研究。

A comprehensive benchmark investigation of quantum chemical methods for carbocations.

作者信息

de Oliveira Marcelo T, Alves Júlia M A, Vrech Natália L, Braga Ataualpa A C, Barboza Cristina A

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Physics, La Trobe Institute of Molecular Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia.

Chemistry Institute of São Carlos, University of São Paulo, Av. Trabalhador São Carlense 400, 13566-590, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2023 Jan 18;25(3):1903-1922. doi: 10.1039/d2cp04603b.

Abstract

The application of various density functional approximations (DFAs) and an emphasis on popular methods without any consensus have prevailed in computational studies dedicated to carbocations. More importantly, an extensive and rigorous benchmark investigation on density functionals for the class is still lacking. To close this gap, we present a comprehensive benchmark study of quantum chemical methods on a series of classical and nonclassical carbocations, the CARBO33 dataset. We evaluate a total of 107 DFT methods from all rungs giving particular attention to double hybrid density functionals as the potential of the class has been largely undermined in the context of carbocations. To support our findings, DLPNO-CCSD(T) at the complete basis set (CBS) limit and W1-F12 are used as reference methods. Our results indicate that the composite CBS-QB3 method performs poorly and should not be adopted for target energies. Oftentimes, the tested DFAs of a lower rung perform better than several DFAs in a higher rung of Perdew's "Jacob's ladder". Nonetheless, double hybrids DSD-PBEP86-NL and ωB97X-2-D3(BJ) stand out by showing the overall best performance. Among the hybrids evaluated, about half of them show mean absolute deviation (MAD) below 1.1 kcal mol, including the popular hybrids M06-2X and mPW1PW91. In this family, MN15-D3(BJ) performs particularly well (MAD = 0.77 kcal mol) displaying reliable results across various tests. Highly popular B3LYP exhibited one of the worst performances (MAD = 4.74 kcal mol), and we do not recommend its application to carbocations. We also assess the 24 general-purpose basis sets of single- up to quadruple-ζ quality. The best compromise between accuracy and computational cost is achieved with cc-pVTZ followed by def2-TZVP. Computations on larger structures of general interest, including terpene carbocations, are also presented for selected DFT methods confirming general trends in the results.

摘要

各种密度泛函近似(DFA)的应用以及对尚无定论的常用方法的强调在致力于碳正离子的计算研究中盛行。更重要的是,针对此类物质的密度泛函仍缺乏广泛而严格的基准研究。为了弥补这一差距,我们针对一系列经典和非经典碳正离子(CARBO33数据集)开展了量子化学方法的全面基准研究。我们总共评估了来自各个层次的107种DFT方法,特别关注双杂化密度泛函,因为该类方法的潜力在碳正离子的背景下在很大程度上被低估了。为了支持我们的研究结果,在完备基组(CBS)极限下的DLPNO-CCSD(T)和W1-F12被用作参考方法。我们的结果表明,复合CBS-QB3方法表现不佳,不应将其用于目标能量计算。通常情况下,较低层次的测试DFA比较高层次的Perdew“雅可比阶梯”中的几种DFA表现更好。尽管如此,双杂化泛函DSD-PBEP86-NL和ωB97X-2-D3(BJ)表现突出,显示出总体最佳性能。在评估的杂化泛函中,约有一半的平均绝对偏差(MAD)低于1.1 kcal/mol,包括常用的杂化泛函M06-2X和mPW1PW91。在这个类别中,MN15-D3(BJ)表现特别出色(MAD = 0.77 kcal/mol),在各种测试中都显示出可靠的结果。广受欢迎的B3LYP表现最差之一(MAD = 4.74 kcal/mol),我们不建议将其应用于碳正离子。我们还评估了24种单ζ至四ζ质量的通用基组。cc-pVTZ其次是def2-TZVP在精度和计算成本之间实现了最佳折衷。还针对选定的DFT方法给出了对包括萜类碳正离子在内的更大感兴趣结构的计算结果,证实了结果中的总体趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验