• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植物促进重连的系统发育和功能约束。

Phylogenetic and functional constraints of plant facilitation rewiring.

机构信息

Centro de Investigaciones Sobre Desertificación (CIDE, CSIC-UV-GV), Moncada, Spain.

出版信息

Ecology. 2023 Feb;104(2):e3961. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3961. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.3961
PMID:36545892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078402/
Abstract

Facilitative interactions bind community species in intricate ecological networks, preserving species that would otherwise be lost. The traditional understanding of ecological networks as static components of biological communities overlooks the fact that species interactions in a network can fluctuate. Analyzing the patterns that cause those shifts can reveal the principles that govern the identity of pairwise interactions and whether they are predictable based on the traits of the interacting species and the local environmental contexts in which they occur. Here we explore how abiotic stress and phylogenetic and functional affinities constrain those shifts. Specifically, we hypothesize that rewiring the facilitative interactions is more limited in stressful than in mild environments. We present evidence of a distinct pattern in the rewiring of facilitation-driven communities at different stress levels. In highly stressful environments with a firm reliance on facilitation, rewiring is limited to growing beneath nurse species with traits to overcome harsh stressful conditions. However, when environments are milder, rewiring is more flexible, although it is still constrained to nurses that are close relatives. Understanding the ability of species to rewire their interactions is crucial for predicting how communities may respond to the unprecedented rate of perturbations on Earth.

摘要

促进性相互作用将社区物种绑定在错综复杂的生态网络中,从而保护那些否则会消失的物种。传统上将生态网络理解为生物群落的静态组成部分,忽略了网络中物种相互作用可能会波动的事实。分析导致这些变化的模式可以揭示支配成对相互作用的原则,以及它们是否可以根据相互作用的物种的特征以及它们所处的局部环境背景来预测。在这里,我们探讨了非生物胁迫以及系统发育和功能亲缘关系如何限制这些变化。具体来说,我们假设在胁迫环境中,促进性相互作用的重新布线比在温和环境中受到更多限制。我们提出了在不同胁迫水平下促进驱动社区重新布线的独特模式的证据。在高度胁迫的环境中,严重依赖促进作用,重新布线仅限于在具有克服恶劣胁迫条件的特征的护士物种下生长。但是,当环境较温和时,重新布线更加灵活,尽管仍然局限于近亲的护士物种。了解物种重新布线相互作用的能力对于预测社区可能如何应对地球上前所未有的干扰速度至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/79e328888f89/ECY-104-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/e582886a81f3/ECY-104-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/7ed96eea3b91/ECY-104-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/38770e30cd9f/ECY-104-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/79e328888f89/ECY-104-0-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/e582886a81f3/ECY-104-0-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/7ed96eea3b91/ECY-104-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/38770e30cd9f/ECY-104-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f721/10078402/79e328888f89/ECY-104-0-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Phylogenetic and functional constraints of plant facilitation rewiring.植物促进重连的系统发育和功能约束。
Ecology. 2023 Feb;104(2):e3961. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3961. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
2
Phylogenetic rewiring in mycorrhizal-plant interaction networks increases community stability in naturally fragmented landscapes.在自然破碎化的景观中,菌根植物相互作用网络的系统发育重连增加了群落的稳定性。
Commun Biol. 2019 Dec 5;2:452. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0700-3. eCollection 2019.
3
Interaction generalisation and demographic feedbacks drive the resilience of plant-insect networks to extinctions.相互作用泛化和人口统计反馈驱动植物-昆虫网络对灭绝的恢复力。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Sep;90(9):2109-2121. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13547. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Phenotypic structure of plant facilitation networks.植物促进网络的表型结构。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Mar;24(3):509-519. doi: 10.1111/ele.13669. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
5
Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?生物相互作用是否塑造了植物群落物种丰富度驼峰模型的两侧?
Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00935.x.
6
Local Facilitation May Cause Tipping Points on a Landscape Level Preceded by Early-Warning Indicators.局部促进作用可能会在景观层面引发临界点,且之前存在预警指标。
Am Nat. 2015 Oct;186(4):E81-90. doi: 10.1086/682674. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
7
Plant facilitation through mycorrhizal symbiosis is stronger between distantly related plant species.植物通过菌根共生的促进作用在亲缘关系较远的植物种间更强。
New Phytol. 2019 Oct;224(2):928-935. doi: 10.1111/nph.16051. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Plant-plant interactions, environmental gradients and plant diversity: a global synthesis of community-level studies.植物间相互作用、环境梯度与植物多样性:群落水平研究的全球综述
Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2014 Aug 20;16(4):154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2014.04.001.
9
Phylogenetic distance and resource availability mediate direction and strength of plant interactions in a competition experiment.系统发育距离和资源可利用性调节竞争实验中植物相互作用的方向和强度。
Oecologia. 2021 Oct;197(2):459-469. doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-05024-4. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Fungal phylogenetic diversity drives plant facilitation.真菌系统发育多样性驱动植物间的促进作用。
Oecologia. 2016 Jun;181(2):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3586-5. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Key concepts and a world-wide look at plant recruitment networks.关键概念以及对全球植物定居网络的审视。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2025 Jun;100(3):1127-1151. doi: 10.1111/brv.13177. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
2
Evolution of rarity and phylogeny determine above- and belowground biomass in plant-plant interactions.稀有度的进化和系统发育决定了植物-植物相互作用中的地上和地下生物量。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0294839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294839. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
V.PhyloMaker2: An updated and enlarged R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants.V.PhyloMaker2:一个经过更新和扩充的R软件包,可生成用于维管植物的非常大型的系统发育树。
Plant Divers. 2022 May 27;44(4):335-339. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2022.05.005. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Phenotypic structure of plant facilitation networks.植物促进网络的表型结构。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Mar;24(3):509-519. doi: 10.1111/ele.13669. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
3
Seeing through the static: the temporal dimension of plant-animal mutualistic interactions.
透视静态:植物-动物互惠相互作用的时间维度。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Jan;24(1):149-161. doi: 10.1111/ele.13623. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Robustness to extinction and plasticity derived from mutualistic bipartite ecological networks.互惠共生二分生态网络带来的灭绝稳健性和可塑性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66131-5.
5
Climate Change and Edaphic Specialists: Irresistible Force Meets Immovable Object?气候变化与土壤专家:不可阻挡的力量遇到不可移动的物体?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr;35(4):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Phylogenetic rewiring in mycorrhizal-plant interaction networks increases community stability in naturally fragmented landscapes.在自然破碎化的景观中,菌根植物相互作用网络的系统发育重连增加了群落的稳定性。
Commun Biol. 2019 Dec 5;2:452. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0700-3. eCollection 2019.
7
Harnessing positive species interactions as a tool against climate-driven loss of coastal biodiversity.利用物种间的正相互作用作为应对气候变化导致沿海生物多样性丧失的工具。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Sep 4;16(9):e2006852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006852. eCollection 2018 Sep.
8
ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R.ape 5.0:R 中的现代系统发育学和进化分析环境。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633.
9
Adaptive Networks for Restoration Ecology.自适应网络在恢复生态学中的应用。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep;33(9):664-675. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
10
Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny.构建一个广泛包容的种子植物系统发育树。
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):302-314. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1019. Epub 2018 Feb 14.