Novascone M A
Department of Human Nutrition and Foods, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 Oct;87(10):1377-80.
The purposes of this research were to study the role of an interview in the selection of applicants in coordinated undergraduate programs (CUPs) in dietetics and to ascertain the nature of the interview in those programs in which it was used. A questionnaire sent to all CUP directors asked why they did or did not use an interview, the criteria used to determine which applicants would be interviewed, and the makeup of the interviewing team. Furthermore, the directors were asked to state the types of questions asked most frequently, the rationale for asking those questions, and the procedure used to evaluate applicants' responses. Finally, the directors were asked to rate the level of influence of selected factors that might be used in the decision regarding admission to CUP. The overall response rate was 81%. Results indicated that an interview is used in 80% of the programs. Difficulty in scheduling and in achieving a standardized method of evaluating an interview were the most frequently cited reasons for not using one. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents ranked an interview as high in influencing the decision regarding admission to CUP. In contrast, 90% of the respondents ranked completion of prerequisite courses and 86% ranked overall GPA as highly influential factors.
本研究的目的是探讨面试在本科营养学协调课程(CUPs)申请人选拔中的作用,并确定在采用面试的课程中面试的性质。向所有CUP主任发放了一份调查问卷,询问他们为何采用或不采用面试、用于确定哪些申请人将接受面试的标准以及面试团队的组成。此外,还要求主任们指出最常问到的问题类型、问这些问题的理由以及用于评估申请人回答的程序。最后,要求主任们对可能用于决定是否录取到CUP的选定因素的影响程度进行评分。总体回复率为81%。结果表明,80%的课程采用了面试。安排面试困难以及难以实现标准化的面试评估方法是最常被提及的不采用面试的原因。37%的受访者认为面试在影响CUP录取决定方面作用很大。相比之下,90%的受访者认为完成先修课程作用很大,86%的受访者认为总体平均绩点作用很大。