• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

游客是自由放养犬只活动的推动者吗?

Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?

作者信息

Schüttler Elke, Jiménez Jaime E

机构信息

Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, Universidad de Magallanes, Teniente Muñoz 166, Puerto Williams 6350000, Chile.

Cape Horn International Center (CHIC), O'Higgins 310, Puerto Williams 6350000, Chile.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(24):3564. doi: 10.3390/ani12243564.

DOI:10.3390/ani12243564
PMID:36552483
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9774271/
Abstract

Dogs are the most abundant carnivores on earth and, as such, negatively impact wildlife. Free-ranging dogs roam in many protected areas, which in turn are often tourist destinations. Whether tourists influence their roaming is largely unexplored but highly relevant to wildlife conservation. To address this question, we obtained (i) 81 completed questionnaires from tourists on their experience with free-ranging dogs in the remote Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile, and (ii) photographs of three camera-traps placed next to trekking trails ( = 87 trap days). A third of the participants were followed by dogs for up to four days, and 39% saw free-ranging dogs on their hikes, but neither feeding dogs nor fear of them had any influence on whether tourists were followed by dogs. Camera-traps yielded 53 independent dog sequences, recorded 32 individuals plus 14 unidentified dogs, of which only one was leashed, with a frequency of one dog every 28 person. In 17% of 53 sequences, dogs were photographed together with hikers carrying large backpacks for several-day trips. We conclude that tourists are facilitators for the movement of dogs and highlight the importance of the engagement of the tourism sector in wildlife conservation in and close to protected areas.

摘要

狗是地球上数量最多的食肉动物,因此对野生动物产生负面影响。散养的狗在许多保护区游荡,而这些保护区往往是旅游目的地。游客是否会影响它们的游荡在很大程度上尚未得到研究,但这与野生动物保护高度相关。为了解决这个问题,我们获取了:(i)81份来自游客的完整问卷,内容是他们在智利偏远的合恩角生物圈保护区与散养狗的经历;(ii)放置在徒步小径旁的三个相机陷阱拍摄的照片(共87个陷阱日)。三分之一的参与者被狗跟随长达四天,39%的人在徒步旅行中看到了散养的狗,但给狗喂食或对狗的恐惧对游客是否被狗跟随均没有任何影响。相机陷阱产生了53个独立的狗的影像序列,记录了32只个体加上14只身份不明的狗,其中只有一只系着 leash,频率为每28人有一只狗。在53个序列中的17%里,狗与背着大型背包进行数日旅行的徒步者一起被拍摄到。我们得出结论,游客是狗移动的促进因素,并强调了旅游部门参与保护区及其周边野生动物保护的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/65a096b058e9/animals-12-03564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/4575ff66e47b/animals-12-03564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/2ba517d37c66/animals-12-03564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/3822bd3bfcae/animals-12-03564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/65a096b058e9/animals-12-03564-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/4575ff66e47b/animals-12-03564-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/2ba517d37c66/animals-12-03564-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/3822bd3bfcae/animals-12-03564-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4324/9774271/65a096b058e9/animals-12-03564-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?游客是自由放养犬只活动的推动者吗?
Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;12(24):3564. doi: 10.3390/ani12243564.
2
Domestic carnivore interactions with wildlife in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile: husbandry and perceptions of impact from a community perspective.智利合恩角生物圈保护区内家食肉动物与野生动物的互动:从社区角度看养殖及对影响的认知
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 4;6:e4124. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4124. eCollection 2018.
3
When free-ranging dogs threaten wildlife: Public attitudes toward management strategies in southern Chile.当自由放养的狗威胁野生动物时:智利南部对管理策略的公众态度。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
4
Tourists' Perceptions of the Free-Roaming Dog Population in Samoa.游客对萨摩亚流浪狗数量的认知。
Animals (Basel). 2014 Sep 29;4(4):599-611. doi: 10.3390/ani4040599.
5
On the causes and consequences of the free-roaming dog problem in southern Chile.智利南部流浪狗问题的成因与后果。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 15;891:164324. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164324. Epub 2023 May 23.
6
Domestic Dogs and Wild Foxes Interactions in a Wildlife-Domestic Interface of North-Central Chile: Implications for Multi-Host Pathogen Transmission.智利中北部野生动物与家畜接触界面上的家犬与野生狐狸的互动:对多宿主病原体传播的影响
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 9;8:631788. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.631788. eCollection 2021.
7
Risk to tourists posed by wild mammals in South Africa.南非野生哺乳动物对游客构成的风险。
J Travel Med. 1999 Sep;6(3):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.1999.tb00856.x.
8
A novel record of African wild dogs () in Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve, Malawi.马拉维Vwaza沼泽野生动物保护区内非洲野犬( )的新记录。 (备注:原文括号里内容缺失,所以译文括号里也无法准确补充完整)
Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct 31;13(11):e10671. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10671. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Investigating the free-roaming dog population and gastrointestinal parasite diversity in Tulúm, México.调查墨西哥图卢姆的流浪狗种群和胃肠道寄生虫多样性。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276880. eCollection 2022.
10
Tourist photographs as a scalable framework for wildlife monitoring in protected areas.旅游照片作为保护区野生动物监测的可扩展框架。
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 22;29(14):R681-R682. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.056.

引用本文的文献

1
Dog-Stranger Interactions Can Facilitate Canine Incursion into Wilderness: The Role of Food Provisioning and Sociability.狗与陌生人的互动会促使犬类进入荒野:食物供应与社交性的作用。
Biology (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;14(8):1006. doi: 10.3390/biology14081006.

本文引用的文献

1
Who let the dogs out? Exploring the spatial ecology of free-roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya.谁把狗放出来了?探索肯尼亚西部自由放养家犬的空间生态学。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 20;11(9):4218-4231. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7317. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Widespread Presence of Domestic Dogs on Sandy Beaches of Southern Chile.智利南部沙滩上普遍存在家犬。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;11(1):161. doi: 10.3390/ani11010161.
3
Why Let the Dogs Out? Exploring Variables Associated with Dog Confinement and General Characteristics of the Free-ranging Owned-Dog Population in a Peri-urban Area.
为什么要让狗出去?探索与狗圈养相关的变量以及半城市地区自由放养的家养犬群的一般特征。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2022 Oct-Dec;25(4):311-325. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1820334. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
4
Sociability of Indian free-ranging dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) varies with human movement in urban areas.印度流浪狗(家犬)的社交性随城市地区人类活动而变化。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 Feb;135(1):89-97. doi: 10.1037/com0000241. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
Global areas of low human impact ('Low Impact Areas') and fragmentation of the natural world.全球人类影响较低的地区(“低影响地区”)和自然世界的破碎化。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 2;9(1):14179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50558-6.
6
Assessing the effects of human activities on the foraging opportunities of migratory shorebirds in Austral high-latitude bays.评估人类活动对高纬度澳地区湾迁徙滨鸟觅食机会的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212441. eCollection 2019.
7
When free-ranging dogs threaten wildlife: Public attitudes toward management strategies in southern Chile.当自由放养的狗威胁野生动物时:智利南部对管理策略的公众态度。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.035. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
A Comparative Study of Enumeration Techniques for Free-Roaming Dogs in Rural Baramati, District Pune, India.印度浦那县巴拉马蒂农村地区自由放养犬只计数技术的比较研究
Front Vet Sci. 2018 May 23;5:104. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00104. eCollection 2018.
9
Domestic carnivore interactions with wildlife in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile: husbandry and perceptions of impact from a community perspective.智利合恩角生物圈保护区内家食肉动物与野生动物的互动:从社区角度看养殖及对影响的认知
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 4;6:e4124. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4124. eCollection 2018.
10
Free-ranging dogs prefer petting over food in repeated interactions with unfamiliar humans.在与陌生人类的反复互动中,散养犬更喜欢被抚摸而非食物。
J Exp Biol. 2017 Dec 15;220(Pt 24):4654-4660. doi: 10.1242/jeb.166371. Epub 2017 Oct 16.