• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心腹腔镜与机器人经腹腔肾上腺切除术的对比分析。

Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Robotic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy Performed at a Single Institution.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital, College of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 29;58(12):1747. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121747.

DOI:10.3390/medicina58121747
PMID:36556949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9786224/
Abstract

Background and Objectives: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the standard surgical approach for adrenalectomy. At present, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) has been introduced at various hospitals. This study evaluated our initial experience with robotic adrenalectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Materials and Methods: From October 2018 to March 2022, 56 adrenalectomies were performed by a single endocrine surgeon. Thirty-two patients underwent LA (LA group), and twenty-four patients underwent RA (RA group). Results: Patients in the RA group were significantly younger than those in the LA group (48.6 ± 9.7 years vs. 55.1 ± 11.4 years, p = 0.013). The RA group had a shorter operation time than the LA group (76.1 ± 28.2 min vs. 118.0 ± 54.3 min, p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay and postoperative pain level between the two groups were similar. There were no complications in the RA group. There was no significant difference in the pathologic diagnosis between the two groups. The cost of surgery was significantly higher in the RA group than in the LA group (5288.5 US dollars vs. 441.5 ± 136.8 US dollars, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our initial experience, RA showed a shorter operation time than LA and no complications. RA could be a viable alternative surgical option for adrenalectomy, notwithstanding its higher cost.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)是肾上腺切除术的标准手术方法。目前,机器人辅助肾上腺切除术(RA)已在多家医院开展。本研究评估了我们在机器人辅助肾上腺切除术方面的初步经验,并与传统腹腔镜肾上腺切除术进行了比较。

材料与方法

自 2018 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月,由一名内分泌外科医生完成了 56 例肾上腺切除术。其中 32 例患者接受 LA(LA 组),24 例患者接受 RA(RA 组)。

结果

RA 组患者明显比 LA 组年轻(48.6±9.7 岁 vs. 55.1±11.4 岁,p=0.013)。RA 组的手术时间明显短于 LA 组(76.1±28.2 分钟 vs. 118.0±54.3 分钟,p<0.001)。两组的住院时间和术后疼痛程度相似。RA 组无并发症。两组的病理诊断无显著差异。RA 组的手术费用明显高于 LA 组(5288.5 美元 vs. 441.5±136.8 美元,p<0.001)。

结论

在我们的初步经验中,RA 组的手术时间短于 LA 组,且无并发症。尽管手术费用较高,但 RA 可能是一种可行的肾上腺切除术替代手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/e5a53ba8acf9/medicina-58-01747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/1e35315115de/medicina-58-01747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/1db66abbf8da/medicina-58-01747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/e5a53ba8acf9/medicina-58-01747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/1e35315115de/medicina-58-01747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/1db66abbf8da/medicina-58-01747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32af/9786224/e5a53ba8acf9/medicina-58-01747-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Robotic Transperitoneal Adrenalectomy Performed at a Single Institution.单中心腹腔镜与机器人经腹腔肾上腺切除术的对比分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 29;58(12):1747. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121747.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: step-by-step technique and comparative outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:分步技术和对比结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic surgery of the adrenal glands: a case-control study comparing surgical techniques.机器人辅助与单纯腹腔镜肾上腺手术:一项比较手术技术的病例对照研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Nov;401(7):999-1006. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1494-0. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Pluriannual Experience in a High-Volume Center Evaluating Indications and Results.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:在一个高容量中心评估适应症和结果的多年经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):375-381. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0839. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
A cost-conscious approach to robotic adrenalectomy.一种具有成本意识的机器人肾上腺切除术方法。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):607-611. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0782-9. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy in pheochromocytoma patients.腹腔镜与机器人肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤患者的比较。
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;126(3):460-464. doi: 10.1002/jso.26918. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Robot assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Should this be the new standard?机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:这应该成为新标准吗?
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):430-436. doi: 10.1177/03915603221097166. Epub 2022 May 28.
8
Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: a review of the national inpatient sample.腹腔镜与机器人肾上腺切除术:国家住院患者样本回顾。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0808-3. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
9
Surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial compared robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.机器人与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤的随机对照试验的手术结果比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Oct;46(10 Pt A):1843-1847. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 23.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in obese patients.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肥胖患者的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1233-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2580-1. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Outcomes of Robotic Adrenalectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.机器人肾上腺切除术与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的治疗结果比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70062. doi: 10.1111/ases.70062.
2
Robotic Adrenalectomy and Clevidipine: A New Frontier in Pheochromocytoma Management Preliminary Study.机器人肾上腺切除术与克利夫地平:嗜铬细胞瘤治疗新前沿的初步研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 9;14(4):1103. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041103.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Adrenalectomy: An Initial Experience in a Turkish Regional Hospital.机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:土耳其一家地区医院的初步经验。
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 29;9:847472. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847472. eCollection 2022.
2
Senhance robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a case series.森瀚思机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:病例系列。
Croat Med J. 2022 Apr 30;63(2):197-201. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2022.63.197.
3
A Descriptive Comparative Analysis of the Surgical Management of Adrenal Tumors: The Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Approaches.肾上腺肿瘤手术治疗的描述性比较分析:开放手术、机器人手术和腹腔镜手术方法
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 3;9:848565. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.848565. eCollection 2022.
4
Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.神经内分泌和肾上腺肿瘤,第2.2021版,美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)肿瘤学临床实践指南
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jul 28;19(7):839-868. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0032.
5
Comparison of robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma: a single-centre retrospective study.机器人辅助腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术与腹膜后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究
BMC Surg. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00895-5.
6
Single-incision robotic adrenalectomy (SIRA): the future of adrenal surgery?单切口机器人肾上腺切除术(SIRA):肾上腺手术的未来?
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):853-858. doi: 10.21037/gs-2019-ra-02.
7
Current status of robotic adrenalectomy in the United States.美国机器人肾上腺切除术的现状
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):840-843. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.39.
8
Robotic adrenalectomy: evaluation of cost-effectiveness.机器人辅助肾上腺切除术:成本效益评估
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):831-839. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.44.
9
Robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy from inception to ingenuity: the perspective on two high volume endocrine surgery centers.从起步到创新:两大高容量内分泌外科中心视角下的机器人经腹肾上腺切除术
Gland Surg. 2020 Jun;9(3):815-825. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.02.21.
10
Retrospective comparison of three minimally invasive approaches for adrenal tumors: perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic, retroperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy.经腹腔腹腔镜、后腹腔腹腔镜和机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的三种微创方法的回顾性比较:围手术期结果。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00637-y.