• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:这应该成为新标准吗?

Robot assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Should this be the new standard?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Apollo Main Hospitals, Chennai, India.

Department of Urology, Amrita Institute of Medical Science, Kochi, India.

出版信息

Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):430-436. doi: 10.1177/03915603221097166. Epub 2022 May 28.

DOI:10.1177/03915603221097166
PMID:35634982
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimal invasive surgeries (MIS) for large size adrenal tumors are still debatable. The objective is to evaluate the contemporary peri- and post-operative outcomes of patients undergoing (open = OA, laparoscopic = LA, and robotic = RA) adrenalectomies in three institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively gathered peri- and post-operative data of 235 patients, underwent adrenalectomy at three Institutions over a 7-year period (2013-2020) were analyzed. All patients underwent thorough radiological and endocrine workup.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty five patients who underwent adrenalectomy (OA ( = 29), LA ( = 146), and RA ( = 60)) were assessed. OA ( = 29) versus Minimally invasive surgery ( = 206) showed significant differences (median, value) in larger tumour size, cm (9.4 vs 5, ( = 0.0001)), longer operative time, mins (240 vs 100, ( = 0.0001)), longer hospital stay, days (8 vs 3,( = .0001)), Higher readmission rates (14% vs 1.9%), higher blood loss, ml (400 vs 100, ( = 0.0001)) requiring blood transfusion (14% vs 4.3%) ( = 0.03), higher intraoperative complication (21% vs 6%) ( = 0.0004), and post op complications (17% vs 5.3%) ( = 0.01). Amongst the MIS (RA vs LA), RA appeared be have better outcomes in terms of shorter operative time, less blood loss and less intra operative complications with a value <0.05. These results were consistent for the assessment of patients who had ⩾6 cm tumor size. The postoperative complication rates were lowest with RA (3.3%) compared to OA (17%) and LA (6.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary practice of adrenalectomy shows that robotic adrenalectomy is safe and effective irrespective of the tumor size.

摘要

介绍

对于大型肾上腺肿瘤,微创外科手术(MIS)仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估在三个机构中接受(开放手术=OA、腹腔镜手术=LA 和机器人手术=RA)肾上腺切除术的患者的当代围手术期结局。

材料和方法

回顾性收集了 2013 年至 2020 年期间在三个机构接受肾上腺切除术的 235 例患者的围手术期和术后数据。所有患者均进行了彻底的影像学和内分泌检查。

结果

评估了 235 例接受肾上腺切除术的患者(OA(=29)、LA(=146)和 RA(=60))。OA(=29)与微创手术(=206)相比,肿瘤大小(cm)(中位数, 值)显著更大(9.4 与 5,(=0.0001)),手术时间更长(min)(240 与 100,(=0.0001)),住院时间更长(天)(8 与 3,(=0.0001)),再入院率更高(14%与 1.9%),出血量更多(ml)(400 与 100,(=0.0001))需要输血(14%与 4.3%)(=0.03),术中并发症更高(21%与 6%)(=0.0004),术后并发症更高(17%与 5.3%)(=0.01)。在微创手术(RA 与 LA)中,RA 在手术时间更短、出血量更少、术中并发症更少方面表现出更好的结果, 值<0.05。这些结果对于评估肿瘤大小 ⩾6cm 的患者是一致的。RA 的术后并发症发生率最低(3.3%),低于 OA(17%)和 LA(6.1%)。

结论

当代肾上腺切除术的实践表明,机器人肾上腺切除术是安全有效的,与肿瘤大小无关。

相似文献

1
Robot assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Should this be the new standard?机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:这应该成为新标准吗?
Urologia. 2022 Aug;89(3):430-436. doi: 10.1177/03915603221097166. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: step-by-step technique and comparative outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:分步技术和对比结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):898-905. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 13.
3
Robotic Adrenalectomy: Are We Expanding the Indications of Minimally Invasive Surgery?机器人肾上腺切除术:我们是否正在扩大微创手术的适应症?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):19-23. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0286. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Pluriannual Experience in a High-Volume Center Evaluating Indications and Results.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:在一个高容量中心评估适应症和结果的多年经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):375-381. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0839. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.机器人辅助后腹腔镜单孔入路肾上腺切除术:技术可行性及初步结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2741-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-2891-z. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
6
Risk factors affecting operative approach, conversion, and morbidity for adrenalectomy: a single-institution series of 402 patients.影响肾上腺切除术手术入路、中转和发病率的风险因素:单机构 402 例系列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2342-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2789-7. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
From open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: thirty years' experience of one medical centre.从开放手术到腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:一家医疗中心三十年的经验。
Endokrynol Pol. 2010 Jan-Feb;61(1):94-101.
8
Laparoscopic hand-assisted adrenalectomy for tumours larger than 5 cm.腹腔镜辅助手助肾上腺切除术治疗大于 5cm 的肿瘤。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Jan;90(1):74-78. doi: 10.1111/cen.13883. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
9
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜经侧腹肾上腺切除术:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8619-8629. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09663-3. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Minimally invasive adrenalectomy results in equivalent perioperative outcomes versus open adrenalectomy for adrenal mass larger than 6 cm: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.对于直径大于 6 厘米的肾上腺肿块,微创肾上腺切除术与开放肾上腺切除术的围手术期结果相当:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;46(5):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma: the keys surgical factors influencing the outcomes-a collective overview.微创与开放肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺皮质癌:影响结局的关键手术因素——综合综述。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 30;408(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02997-z.