Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Nov 30;58(12):1762. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121762.
: Although rigid bronchoscopy is generally performed in the operating room (OR), the intervention is sometimes emergently required at the intensive care unit (ICU) bedside. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of rigid bronchoscopy at the ICU bedside. : We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients who underwent rigid bronchoscopy while in the ICU from January 2014 to December 2020. According to the location of rigid bronchoscopic intervention, patients were classified into the ICU group ( = 171, cases emergently performed at the ICU bedside without anesthesiologists) and the OR group ( = 165, cases electively performed in the OR with anesthesiologists). The risk of intra- and post-procedural complications in the ICU group was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, with the OR group as the reference category. : Of 336 patients, 175 (52.1%) were moribund and survival was not expected without intervention, and 170 (50.6%) received invasive respiratory support before the intervention. The most common reasons for intervention were post-intubation tracheal stenosis (39.3%) and malignant airway obstruction (34.5%). Although the overall rate of intra-procedural complications did not differ between the two groups (86.0% vs. 80.6%, = 0.188), post-procedural complications were more frequent in the ICU group than in the OR group (24.0% vs. 12.1%, = 0.005). Severe complications requiring unexpected invasive management occurred only post-procedurally and were more common in the ICU group (10.5% vs. 4.8%, = 0.052). In the fully adjusted model, the ICU group had increased odds for severe post-procedural complications, but statistical significance was not observed (odds ratio, 2.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-8.88; = 0.144). : Although general anesthesia is generally considered the gold standard for rigid bronchoscopy, our findings indicate that rigid bronchoscopy may be safely performed at the ICU bedside in selective cases of emergency. Moreover, adequate patient selection and close post-procedural monitoring are required to prevent severe complications.
虽然硬质支气管镜检查通常在手术室(OR)进行,但有时也需要在重症监护病房(ICU)床边紧急进行。本研究旨在评估 ICU 床边硬质支气管镜检查的安全性。
我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在 ICU 接受硬质支气管镜检查的患者的病历。根据硬质支气管镜介入的位置,患者被分为 ICU 组(=171 例,在 ICU 床边紧急进行,无麻醉师)和 OR 组(=165 例,在 OR 中择期进行,有麻醉师)。使用多变量逻辑回归分析 ICU 组患者术中及术后并发症的风险,以 OR 组为参考类别。
在 336 例患者中,175 例(52.1%)生命垂危,如果不进行干预,预计无法存活,170 例(50.6%)在干预前接受了有创呼吸支持。干预的最常见原因是气管插管后狭窄(39.3%)和恶性气道阻塞(34.5%)。尽管两组患者术中并发症的总体发生率无差异(86.0% vs. 80.6%,=0.188),但 ICU 组术后并发症发生率高于 OR 组(24.0% vs. 12.1%,=0.005)。仅在术后发生需要意外有创治疗的严重并发症,且 ICU 组更为常见(10.5% vs. 4.8%,=0.052)。在完全调整的模型中,ICU 组发生严重术后并发症的可能性增加,但无统计学意义(优势比,2.54;95%置信区间,0.73-8.88;=0.144)。
虽然全身麻醉通常被认为是硬质支气管镜检查的金标准,但我们的研究结果表明,在选择性紧急情况下,硬质支气管镜检查可在 ICU 床边安全进行。此外,需要进行适当的患者选择和术后密切监测,以防止严重并发症的发生。