Shabani Mohsen, Salehi Javad, Khosrowabadi Reza
Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University GC, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2022 Jul-Aug;13(4):489-499. doi: 10.32598/bcn.2021.2275.2. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
Consumers' prior experiences form an episodic memory that largely influences their decision-making process. This episodic memory is mainly linked to cognitive and emotional perception and we know that brand image influences our cognitive and emotional perception. Nevertheless, it has not been well described how autobiographical memories of brand images differ from other types of images.
In this study, we hypothesized that brand pictures have a higher chance to create false memories as compared to neutral ones.
We investigated this hypothesis using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm with lists of brand pictures from the local market and associated neutral images from the international affective picture system. Thirty graduate students were exposed to image stimuli, followed by a distractor task and a recognition task. After the normality test, reaction times (RT), and false recognition rate of brands and neutral images were statistically compared using a pairwise t-test.
The results showed a significant decrease in reaction time (RT) and an increase in the false recognition rate of brand pictures compared to neutral images. Interestingly, the effect of gender on the creation of false memory by autobiographical brand images was not significant. We hope these findings can pave the way for a better understanding of the false memory mechanism.
Autobiographical brand images give a higher chance of false memory as compared to neutral imagesMen and women do not differ in the formation of false memoryReaction time in false memory is longer than in true memory.False positives create more cognitive load.
We see many images around us every day, such as the image of different brands in our daily shopping, which puts us in front of different types of images, many of which are old, these brands become part of our life memories, and their images are aspects of autobiography. Therefore, these brands can form false memories for people. The image stimuli of this study are to investigate whether these images can form false memories or not. The results showed that the images that we see every day in the street of the supermarket and can change our memories.
消费者先前的经历形成了情景记忆,这在很大程度上影响着他们的决策过程。这种情景记忆主要与认知和情感感知相关联,并且我们知道品牌形象会影响我们的认知和情感感知。然而,品牌形象的自传式记忆与其他类型的图像记忆有何不同,目前尚未得到充分描述。
在本研究中,我们假设与中性图片相比,品牌图片产生错误记忆的可能性更高。
我们使用迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式,采用来自当地市场的品牌图片列表以及国际情感图片系统中的相关中性图片,对这一假设进行了研究。30名研究生接受图像刺激,随后进行干扰任务和识别任务。在进行正态性检验后,使用配对t检验对品牌和中性图片的反应时间(RT)以及错误识别率进行统计学比较。
结果显示,与中性图片相比,品牌图片的反应时间(RT)显著缩短,错误识别率增加。有趣的是,性别对自传式品牌形象产生错误记忆的影响并不显著。我们希望这些发现能够为更好地理解错误记忆机制铺平道路。
与中性图片相比,自传式品牌形象产生错误记忆的可能性更高男性和女性在错误记忆的形成上没有差异错误记忆中的反应时间比真实记忆中的更长。误报会产生更多的认知负荷。
我们每天在周围看到许多图像,比如日常购物中不同品牌的图像,这使我们面对不同类型的图像,其中许多是旧的,这些品牌成为我们生活记忆的一部分,它们的图像是自传的一部分。因此,这些品牌会给人们形成错误记忆。本研究的图像刺激旨在调查这些图像是否会形成错误记忆。结果表明,我们在超市街道上每天看到的图像会改变我们的记忆。