• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入人群中埃默里风险评分的验证:加拿大视角

Validation of the Emory Risk Score in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Population: A Canadian Perspective.

作者信息

Hyde Emily K, Throndson Karen, Arcinas Liane A, Shah Ashish H, Hiebert Brett, Yamashita Michael H, Lee Samson Donna, Maric Anita, Love Reid, Poettcker Denise, Arora Rakesh C, Seifer Colette M, Kass Malek

机构信息

Cardiac Sciences, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2022 Aug 27;4(12):1060-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.010. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.010
PMID:36562015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9764109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation may be indicated post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Emory Risk Score (ERS) is a validated predictive risk score of the need for a PPM post-TAVI using a balloon-expandable valve. Our objectives were to determine the validity of the ERS in our local TAVI population with both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves and to identify additional electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters predictive of the need for a PPM post-TAVI.

METHODS

Retrospective chart and electronic database reviews were performed to collect demographic and procedural information. Two expert readers reviewed all ECGs. Independent factors associated with PPM implantation were examined with multivariable logistic regression via a stepwise selection process with calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess model discrimination.

RESULTS

The overall PPM implantation rate was 11.7%; rates were 9% for the Sapien 3 valves, 10% for the Evolut Pro valves, and 17% for the Evolut R valves. The ERS was found to not be predictive of need for PPM post-TAVI for the entire cohort. Right bundle branch block was the only ERS parameter independently associated with new PPM implant (8.5% vs 25%, odds ratio = 3.59,  = 0.01). No additional ECG parameters met the criteria for statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The poor predictive value of the ERS in determining the need for a PPM post-TAVI in our patient population suggests that further refinement of a formula (or risk-calculator) is warranted. Identification of a precise risk-calculator is likely to facilitate patient mobilization and reduce inpatient healthcare resource utilization.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后可能需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)。埃默里风险评分(ERS)是一种经过验证的预测风险评分,用于预测使用球囊扩张瓣膜进行TAVI后是否需要植入PPM。我们的目标是确定ERS在我们当地使用球囊扩张瓣膜和自膨胀瓣膜的TAVI人群中的有效性,并确定其他预测TAVI后需要植入PPM的心电图(ECG)参数。

方法

进行回顾性病历和电子数据库审查以收集人口统计学和手术信息。两位专家读者审查了所有心电图。通过逐步选择过程,采用多变量逻辑回归分析与PPM植入相关的独立因素,并计算受试者工作特征曲线下面积以评估模型的辨别力。

结果

总体PPM植入率为11.7%;Sapien 3瓣膜的植入率为9%,Evolut Pro瓣膜为10%,Evolut R瓣膜为17%。发现ERS不能预测整个队列中TAVI后是否需要PPM。右束支传导阻滞是与新的PPM植入独立相关的唯一ERS参数(8.5%对25%,比值比=3.59,P=0.01)。没有其他ECG参数达到统计学意义标准。

结论

ERS在确定我们患者群体中TAVI后是否需要PPM方面预测价值不佳,这表明有必要进一步完善公式(或风险计算器)。确定精确的风险计算器可能有助于患者活动,并减少住院医疗资源的利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f992/9764109/e3bed1124568/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f992/9764109/ca026b5819ec/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f992/9764109/e3bed1124568/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f992/9764109/ca026b5819ec/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f992/9764109/e3bed1124568/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Emory Risk Score in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Population: A Canadian Perspective.经导管主动脉瓣植入人群中埃默里风险评分的验证:加拿大视角
CJC Open. 2022 Aug 27;4(12):1060-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.010. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.评估风险评分在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入率中的有效性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;2020:1807909. doi: 10.1155/2020/1807909. eCollection 2020.
3
Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis using Medtronic new generation self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R.使用美敦力新一代自膨胀CoreValve Evolut R经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄后永久性起搏器植入的预测因素
Heart Vessels. 2019 Feb;34(2):360-367. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1236-z. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
4
Predictors of Conduction Disturbances Requiring New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using the Evolut Series.使用Evolut系列经导管主动脉瓣植入术后需要植入新的永久性起搏器的传导障碍预测因素。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 22;12(14):4835. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144835.
5
The incidence of transcatheter aortic valve implantation-related heart block in self-expandable Medtronic CoreValve and balloon-expandable Edwards valves.经导管主动脉瓣植入相关心脏传导阻滞在美敦力自膨胀CoreValve瓣膜和爱德华兹球囊扩张瓣膜中的发生率。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Apr;24(4):173-6.
6
Survival relative to pacemaker status after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后与起搏器状态相关的生存情况。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep;98(3):E444-E452. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29498. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Transcatheter Heart Valve Selection and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Pre-Existent Right Bundle Branch Block.已有右束支传导阻滞患者的经导管心脏瓣膜选择与永久性起搏器植入术
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 3;6(3):e005028. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005028.
8
Short term clinical outcomes and analysis of risk factors for pacemaker implantation: a single center experience of self-expandable TAVI valves.短期临床结果和经皮自膨式 TAVI 瓣膜植入的危险因素分析:单中心经验。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jul 29;15(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01241-9.
9
Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a 10-year single center experience.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性心脏起搏器需求的心电图和临床预测因素:一项 10 年单中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2021 Apr;62(2):169-174. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11342-9. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Risk Factors for Permanent Pacemaker after Implantation of Surgical or Percutaneous Self-Expanding Aortic Prostheses.植入外科或经皮自膨式主动脉假体后永久性起搏器植入的危险因素。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2016 Nov;25(6):663-671.

引用本文的文献

1
A Two-Step Risk Score for Prediction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后永久性起搏器植入预测的两步风险评分
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039036. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039036. Epub 2025 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Outcomes Associated With Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后永久性心脏起搏器植入的长期预后。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116564. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16564.
2
Computed tomography derived predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.经计算机断层扫描预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入的因素:一项荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 15;98(6):E897-E907. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29805. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
评估风险评分在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入率中的有效性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;2020:1807909. doi: 10.1155/2020/1807909. eCollection 2020.
4
Cardiac surgery in North America and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Regional variability in burden and impact.北美心脏手术与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19):负担和影响的区域性差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Sep;162(3):893-903.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.077. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
A Review of Temporary Permanent Pacemakers and a Comparison with Conventional Temporary Pacemakers.临时永久性起搏器综述及其与传统临时起搏器的比较。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019 May 15;10(5):3652-3661. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100506. eCollection 2019 May.
6
Comparison of the self-expanding Evolut-PRO transcatheter aortic valve to its predecessor Evolut-R in the real world multicenter ATLAS registry.在真实世界多中心ATLAS注册研究中,自膨胀式Evolut-PRO经导管主动脉瓣与其前身Evolut-R的比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.02.070. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Meta-Analysis Comparing Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.Meta 分析比较重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;125(3):449-458. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.057. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Development of a Risk Score to Predict New Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测新起搏器植入风险评分的开发。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2133-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.015.
9
2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.2019 加拿大心血管学会经导管主动脉瓣植入术立场声明。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Nov;35(11):1437-1448. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.08.011.
10
Management of Conduction Disturbances Associated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.经导管主动脉瓣置换术相关传导障碍的管理:美国心脏病学会科学专家小组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 27;74(8):1086-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.014.