• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估风险评分在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入率中的有效性。

Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra-Northwell, 300 Community Drive, 1DSU, Manhasset 11030, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;2020:1807909. doi: 10.1155/2020/1807909. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/1807909
PMID:33149728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7596463/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Requirement of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known and common postoperative consequence of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The Emory risk score has been recently developed to help risk stratify the need for PPM insertion in patients undergoing TAVR with SAPIEN 3 valves. Our aim was to assess the validity of this risk score in our patient population, as well as its applicability to patients receiving self-expanding valves.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 479 TAVR patients without preoperative pacemakers from November 2016 through December 2018. Preoperative risk factors included in the Emory risk score were collected for each patient: preoperative QRS, preoperative right bundle branch block (RBBB), preoperative syncope, and degree of valve oversizing. Multivariable analysis of the individual variables within the scoring system to identify predictors of PPM placement was performed. The predictive discrimination of the risk score for the risk of PPM placement after TAVR was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that, of the 479 patients analyzed, 236 (49.3%) received balloon-expandable valves and 243 (50.7%) received self-expanding valves. Pacemaker rates were higher in patients receiving self-expanding valves than those receiving balloon-expandable valves (25.1% versus 16.1%, =0.018). The Emory risk score showed a moderate correlation with pacemaker requirement in patients receiving each valve type, with AUC for balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves of 0.657 and 0.645, respectively. Of the four risk score components, preoperative RBBB was the only predictor of pacemaker requirement with an AUC of 0.615 for both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves. , the Emory risk score had modest predictive utility for PPM insertion after balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR. The risk score did not offer better discriminatory utility than that of preoperative RBBB alone. Understanding the determinants of PPM insertion after TAVR can better guide patient education and postoperative management.

摘要

简介

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后需要植入永久性起搏器(PPM)是已知的常见术后后果。Emory 风险评分最近被开发出来,以帮助对接受 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜的 TAVR 患者进行 PPM 插入的需求进行风险分层。我们的目的是评估该风险评分在我们患者人群中的有效性,以及其在接受自膨式瓣膜的患者中的适用性。

方法

我们对 2016 年 11 月至 2018 年 12 月期间 479 例无术前起搏器的 TAVR 患者进行了回顾性研究。为每位患者收集了 Emory 风险评分中的术前风险因素:术前 QRS、术前右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、术前晕厥和瓣膜过度扩张程度。对评分系统中的单个变量进行多变量分析,以确定 PPM 放置的预测因素。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估风险评分对 TAVR 后 PPM 放置风险的预测区分能力。

结果

我们的结果表明,在分析的 479 例患者中,236 例(49.3%)接受了球囊扩张瓣膜,243 例(50.7%)接受了自膨式瓣膜。接受自膨式瓣膜的患者比接受球囊扩张瓣膜的患者更需要起搏器(25.1%比 16.1%,=0.018)。Emory 风险评分与两种瓣膜类型的患者起搏器需求有中度相关性,球囊扩张瓣膜和自膨式瓣膜的 AUC 分别为 0.657 和 0.645。在四个风险评分组成部分中,术前 RBBB 是起搏器需求的唯一预测因素,球囊扩张瓣膜和自膨式瓣膜的 AUC 分别为 0.615。在接受球囊扩张和自膨式 TAVR 的患者中,Emory 风险评分对 PPM 植入有适度的预测作用。风险评分没有比术前 RBBB 单独提供更好的鉴别能力。了解 TAVR 后 PPM 插入的决定因素可以更好地指导患者教育和术后管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff2/7596463/1a1c53f51532/JITC2020-1807909.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff2/7596463/d217b1c098eb/JITC2020-1807909.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff2/7596463/1a1c53f51532/JITC2020-1807909.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff2/7596463/d217b1c098eb/JITC2020-1807909.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ff2/7596463/1a1c53f51532/JITC2020-1807909.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Validity of Risk Scoring in Predicting Pacemaker Rates following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.评估风险评分在经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入率中的有效性。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Oct 20;2020:1807909. doi: 10.1155/2020/1807909. eCollection 2020.
2
Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者右心室起搏及起搏器依赖的预测因素
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;51(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0303-1. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
3
Prospective validation of a risk score to predict pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测起搏器植入风险评分的前瞻性验证。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;34(11):2225-2232. doi: 10.1111/jce.16061. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Predictors for new-onset conduction block in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a new-generation self-expanding valve (VitaFlow Liberty): a retrospective cohort study.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发传导阻滞的预测因素:新一代自膨式瓣膜(VitaFlow Liberty)治疗单纯原发性主动脉瓣反流的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 28;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03735-z.
5
The influence of native aortic valve calcium and transcatheter valve oversize on the need for pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve insertion.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后,主动脉瓣.native 钙化和经导管瓣膜过度扩张对需要植入起搏器的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 May;153(5):1056-1062.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
6
Predictors and 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of Pacemaker After TAVR: Analysis From the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 Registries.经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后起搏器的预测因素和 5 年临床结局:来自 PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 注册研究的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jun 10;17(11):1325-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.03.034.
7
Incidence and Outcomes of New-Onset Right Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后新发右束支传导阻滞的发生率和转归。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;17(2):e012377. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012377. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
8
Pre-Existing Right Bundle Branch Block Increases Risk for Death After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Balloon-Expandable Valve.预存的右束支传导阻滞增加了经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术后的死亡风险。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2210-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.035.
9
Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久起搏器植入的预测因素和临床转归:PARTNER(AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves 的放置)试验和注册研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.07.022.
10
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A Two-Step Risk Score for Prediction of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后永久性起搏器植入预测的两步风险评分
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e039036. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039036. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Conduction Disturbances: Focus on Clinical Implications.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与传导障碍:聚焦临床意义
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Nov 19;10(11):469. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110469.
3
Validation of the Emory Risk Score in the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Population: A Canadian Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Risk Score to Predict New Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后预测新起搏器植入风险评分的开发。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 11;12(21):2133-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.015.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
Predictors of paravalvular regurgitation and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR with a next-generation self-expanding device.
经导管主动脉瓣植入人群中埃默里风险评分的验证:加拿大视角
CJC Open. 2022 Aug 27;4(12):1060-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.010. eCollection 2022 Dec.
经新一代自膨式瓣膜置换术后的瓣周漏和永久性心脏起搏器植入的预测因素。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Aug;107(8):688-697. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1235-1. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
4
Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后永久性起搏器植入——预测因素及其对预后的影响
Interv Cardiol. 2015 May;10(2):98-102. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.2.98.
5
Pacemaker implantation rate after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with early and new-generation devices: a systematic review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期和新一代器械植入起搏器的比率:系统评价。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):2003-2013. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx785.
6
A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR.经 TAVR 治疗后植入起搏器的高预测风险模型。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1139-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
7
Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.经股动脉主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)植入爱德华兹·莎普爱思 3 瓣膜后患者行永久性心脏起搏器植入的预测因素。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Aug;106(8):590-597. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1093-2. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
The influence of native aortic valve calcium and transcatheter valve oversize on the need for pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve insertion.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后,主动脉瓣.native 钙化和经导管瓣膜过度扩张对需要植入起搏器的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 May;153(5):1056-1062.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.038. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
9
Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后植入永久起搏器的预测因素:SAPIEN 3 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 14;9(21):2200-2209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.034.
10
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.