Suppr超能文献

超声造影中的伪影及技术相关问题

Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, E6-230-BF, Dallas, TX 75390-8896 (D.T.F., K.V., A.P.L.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL (M.P.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ (N.D.); and Department of Radiology, Jefferson Health New Jersey, Thomas Jefferson University, Cherry Hill, NJ (S.K.R.).

出版信息

Radiographics. 2023 Feb;43(2):e220093. doi: 10.1148/rg.220093.

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), similar to other radiologic modalities, requires specific technical considerations and is subject to image artifacts. These artifacts may affect examination quality, negatively impact diagnostic accuracy, and decrease user comfort when using this emerging technique. Some artifacts are related to commonly known gray-scale US artifacts that can also appear on the contrast-only image (tissue-subtracted image obtained with the linear responses from background tissues nulled). These may include acoustic shadowing and enhancement; reverberation, refraction, and reflection; and poor penetration. Other artifacts are exclusive to CEUS owing to the techniques used for contrast mode image generation and the unique properties of the microbubbles that constitute ultrasound-specific contrast agents (UCAs). UCA-related artifacts may appear on the contrast-only image, the gray-scale image, or various Doppler mode images. Artifacts related to CEUS may include nonlinear artifacts and unintentional microbubble destruction resulting in pseudowashout. The microbubbles themselves may result in specific artifacts such as pseudoenhancement, signal saturation, and attenuation and shadowing and can confound the use of color and spectral Doppler US. Identifying and understanding these artifacts and knowing how to mitigate them may improve the quality of the imaging study, increase user confidence, and improve patient care. The authors review the principles of UCAs and the sound-microbubble interaction, as well as the technical aspects of image generation. Technical considerations, including patient positioning, depth, acoustic window, and contrast agent dose, also are discussed. Specific artifacts are described, with tips on how to identify and, if necessary, apply corrective measures, with the goal of improving examination quality. RSNA, 2022 and

摘要

对比增强超声(CEUS)与其他影像学方式类似,需要特定的技术考虑因素,并可能受到图像伪影的影响。这些伪影可能会影响检查质量,降低诊断准确性,并降低使用者在使用这种新兴技术时的舒适度。一些伪影与通常所知的灰阶超声伪影有关,这些伪影也可能出现在仅对比图像上(通过线性响应从背景组织中消除获得的组织减影图像)。这些可能包括声影和增强、混响、折射和反射以及穿透力差。其他伪影是由于对比模式图像生成所使用的技术以及构成超声专用对比剂(UCAs)的微泡的独特特性而仅在 CEUS 中出现。CA 相关的伪影可能出现在仅对比图像、灰阶图像或各种多普勒模式图像上。与 CEUS 相关的伪影可能包括非线性伪影和无意的微泡破坏导致的假性洗脱。微泡本身可能会导致特定的伪影,如假性增强、信号饱和和衰减以及声影,并可能混淆彩色和频谱多普勒超声的使用。识别和理解这些伪影并知道如何减轻它们可能会提高成像研究的质量,增加使用者的信心,并改善患者的护理。作者回顾了 UCAs 的原理和声-微泡相互作用,以及图像生成的技术方面。还讨论了技术考虑因素,包括患者体位、深度、声窗和对比剂剂量。描述了特定的伪影,并提供了如何识别和在必要时应用纠正措施的提示,以提高检查质量。RSNA,2022 年

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验