Suppr超能文献

尽管使用利伐沙班进行了全身抗凝治疗,但利伐沙班联合阿司匹林与醋硝香豆素治疗复发性静脉血栓栓塞事件的比较。

Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol to manage recurrent venous thromboembolic events despite systemic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

作者信息

Maximiliano Correa Lara, Jaime García Chavez, Erika Martinez Hernandez

机构信息

Centro Medico Nacional "La Raza", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico; Environmental Toxicology Laboratory, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico.

Centro Medico Nacional "La Raza", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2023 Feb;222:43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

摘要

引言

对于在接受治疗性抗凝治疗时发生复发性血栓栓塞事件的患者,其评估和管理尚未得到充分描述;此外,尚未有针对抗凝治疗期间复发性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)患者治疗的系统评价或随机试验。因此,我们开展了一项试点试验,以比较利伐沙班联合阿司匹林与醋硝香豆素在尽管正在接受利伐沙班抗凝治疗但仍发生复发性静脉血栓栓塞的患者中的疗效。

材料与方法

该研究为多中心随机临床试验。我们将客观记录有复发性静脉血栓栓塞的患者随机分配,分别接受利伐沙班(每日一次,每次20mg)联合阿司匹林(每日一次,每次300mg)或调整剂量的醋硝香豆素治疗。该研究旨在评估复发性血栓栓塞事件(同侧或对侧复发性DVT、PE、缺血性卒中及心肌梗死)和出血事件的发生率。

结果

共有58例患者被随机分组:28例被分配至利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组,30例被分配至醋硝香豆素组。随访90天后,醋硝香豆素组发生了3例复发性血栓栓塞事件(主要结局)——2例DVT和1例缺血性卒中,而利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组未发生事件(风险比[RR]0.15;95%置信区间[CI]0.008 - 2.83;P = 0.20)。醋硝香豆素组有5例患者发生轻微出血,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组无出血发生(RR 0.09;95% CI 0.005 - 1.68;p = 0.10)。利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组发生1例非致命性胃肠道大出血。

结论

在这项试点研究中,所评估的任何结局均无显著差异;然而,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组复发性血栓栓塞事件和轻微出血事件在数值上发生频率较低。这些数据表明需要开展更广泛的具有足够统计学效力的随机研究以阐明这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验