• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别影响教师互动的因素:一项元综合研究。

Identifying the factors affecting on interaction of faculty member: A meta-synthesis.

作者信息

Mohammadimehr Mojgan, Haji Jamal

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Paramedicine, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Education Development Center, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Oct 31;11:343. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1602_21. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1602_21
PMID:36568014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9768717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to interact and communicate effectively is one of the factors affecting the performance of faculty members, which is considered one of their basic competencies. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors affecting on interaction of faculty member with student and colleague, through the synthesis of literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research method was qualitative with a meta-synthesis approach. Meta-synthesis was performed with Sandelowski and Barroso method. After the research of databases in the period 1995-2021, 259 studies were collected and finally 48 sources were selected and were included in the analysis phase. Coding method was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Analyzing the findings of previous researchers and synthesizing the results, 155 codes, 18 subcategories, and 6 categories were identified and validated through kappa coefficient. The categories included "emotional-cognitive factor," "sociocultural factor," "communication factor," "professional factor," "educational factors," and "management factor."

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this study and the importance of faculty members' interactions in medical universities, it is recommended that university officials and administrators use the results of this study to provide a suitable platform for creating and strengthening these interactions through holding workshops.

摘要

背景

有效互动与沟通的能力是影响教师表现的因素之一,被视为教师的基本能力之一。本研究旨在通过文献综合分析,确定影响教师与学生及同事互动的因素。

材料与方法

本研究采用定性研究方法,采用元综合法。元综合采用桑德洛斯基和巴罗斯方法进行。在对1995 - 2021年期间的数据库进行检索后,收集了259项研究,最终选择了48项资料纳入分析阶段。采用编码方法对数据进行分析。

结果

通过对以往研究结果进行分析并综合结果,确定了155个代码、18个子类别和6个类别,并通过kappa系数进行了验证。这些类别包括“情感认知因素”、“社会文化因素”、“沟通因素”、“专业因素”、“教育因素”和“管理因素”。

结论

基于本研究结果以及教师互动在医科大学中的重要性,建议大学管理人员和行政人员利用本研究结果,通过举办研讨会,为建立和加强这些互动提供合适的平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/6f9cfc34a50f/JEHP-11-343-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/3407b78da6af/JEHP-11-343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/162c9733b7c9/JEHP-11-343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/6f9cfc34a50f/JEHP-11-343-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/3407b78da6af/JEHP-11-343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/162c9733b7c9/JEHP-11-343-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e36/9768717/6f9cfc34a50f/JEHP-11-343-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying the factors affecting on interaction of faculty member: A meta-synthesis.识别影响教师互动的因素:一项元综合研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Oct 31;11:343. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1602_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Faculty retention in regional medical schools in Iran: a qualitative content analysis.伊朗地区医学院校教师保留:定性内容分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02473-y.
3
A conceptual model for empowering faculty members of third-generation universities of medical sciences.第三代医科大学教师赋权的概念模型。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022 Oct 19;18(2):371-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.10.002. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Strategies to increase social capital and interaction of faculty members of medical universities.增加医科大学教职员工社会资本和互动的策略。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Sep 28;11:300. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_931_21. eCollection 2022.
5
Research priorities in medical education: A national study.医学教育中的研究重点:一项全国性研究。
J Res Med Sci. 2012 Jan;17(1):83-91.
6
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
7
A model for evaluation of faculty members' activities based on meta-evaluation of a 5-year experience in medical school.基于医学院5年经验的元评估的教师活动评估模型。
J Res Med Sci. 2015 Jun;20(6):563-70. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.165958.
8
Exploring the challenges of professional identity formation in clinical education environment: A qualitative study.探索临床教育环境中职业身份形成的挑战:一项定性研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020 Jan;8(1):42-49. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2019.74806.0.
9
Competences of academic librarians in providing health research services: A qualitative study.学术图书馆员提供健康研究服务的能力:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Aug 31;9:220. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_254_20. eCollection 2020.
10
An ambiguous relationship--a qualitative meta-synthesis of hospitalized somatic patients' experience of interaction with fellow patients.一种模糊的关系——对住院躯体疾病患者与同病房患者互动体验的质性元整合分析
Scand J Caring Sci. 2013 Sep;27(3):495-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01054.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing educational gaps in Iran's nursing education system: a mixed-method approach to the infectious diseases curriculum.评估伊朗护理教育体系中的教育差距:传染病课程的混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 16;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07311-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the components of student support system in blended learning for Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences: A thematic analysis.探索伊朗医科大学混合式学习中学生支持系统的组成部分:一项主题分析。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 20;10:130. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_863_20. eCollection 2021.
2
Factors related to the international research collaboration in the health area: A qualitative study.卫生领域国际研究合作的相关因素:一项定性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Oct 30;9:267. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_497_20. eCollection 2020.
3
Using a Facebook group to facilitate faculty-student interactions during preclinical medical education: a retrospective survey analysis.
利用 Facebook 群组促进临床医学教育前阶段的师生互动:回顾性调查分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02003-w.
4
Faculty and Student Interaction in an Online Master's Course: Survey and Content Analysis.在线硕士课程中的师生互动:调查与内容分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 4;5(1):e10464. doi: 10.2196/10464.
5
Student-faculty relationships and its impact on academic outcomes.师生关系及其对学业成绩的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
6
Teacher-student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field.大学中的师生关系:一个重要但研究不足的领域。
Oxf Rev Educ. 2014 May 4;40(3):370-388. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2014.921613. Epub 2014 May 21.
7
The user experience of critical care discharge: a meta-synthesis of qualitative research.重症监护出院患者的用户体验:定性研究的综合分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Apr;47(4):487-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
8
Metasynthesis: the state of the art--so far.
Qual Health Res. 2003 Sep;13(7):893-904. doi: 10.1177/1049732303253462.