Suppr超能文献

参与二甲双胍治疗妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的随机对照试验(RCT):孕妇对决策过程的看法和体验。

Participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): pregnant women's perceptions and experiences of the decision-making process.

作者信息

Wallace Sinead, Houghton Catherine, Dunne Fidelma

机构信息

HRB Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Áras Moyola, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

HRB Open Res. 2021 Jun 14;4:65. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13289.1. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Research in pregnancy and childbirth is required to advance healthcare needs for this population. Fears around potential fetal risk and the history of drug scandals renders it an area of research that is somewhat neglected. Due to the growing medical complexities facing pregnant women, efforts have been made in recent times to recognise the ethical importance of including this population in clinical research. Although clinical trials are becoming more common in pregnancy, recruitment of this population remains difficult with a common assumption that pregnant women would be reluctant to participate in clinical trials. This study set out to explore pregnant women's perspectives and experiences of the decision-making process to participate in a randomised controlled trial of metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus (the EMERGE clinical trial). This study employed a qualitative descriptive design with thematic analysis. Data were collected by conducting individual semi-structured interviews (n=11) with participants (n=9) and decliners (n=2) of the EMERGE clinical trial.  The main findings reveal that a significant perception of personal benefit from participation was the biggest influence on women's decisions to participate. Concerns about the impact of gestational diabetes on their pregnancies, the option of a favourable intervention treatment, a low perception of risk associated with the trial and the opportunity to help medical research appeared to have significantly influenced their decision. Receiving detailed information, personal interactions with the study team, a perception of voluntariness in participation and accessibility of the trial positively impacted on women's decisions to participate.  Personal contact during recruitment, presenting clear and thorough trial information, providing previous participant testimonials, and facilitating women to participate in clinical trials are all important strategies when trying to enhance recruitment in pregnancy trials. Further research on pregnant women declining participation in clinical trials is needed.

摘要

为了满足这一人群的医疗保健需求,有必要开展妊娠和分娩方面的研究。对潜在胎儿风险的担忧以及药物丑闻的历史,使得这一研究领域在一定程度上被忽视。由于孕妇面临的医疗复杂性不断增加,近年来人们已努力认识到将这一人群纳入临床研究的伦理重要性。尽管临床试验在孕期越来越普遍,但招募这一人群仍然困难,人们普遍认为孕妇会不愿意参与临床试验。本研究旨在探讨孕妇参与二甲双胍治疗妊娠期糖尿病随机对照试验(EMERGE临床试验)决策过程的观点和经历。本研究采用定性描述设计和主题分析。通过对EMERGE临床试验的参与者(n=9)和拒绝者(n=2)进行个体半结构化访谈(n=11)收集数据。主要研究结果表明,对参与带来的个人益处的显著认知是影响女性参与决策的最大因素。对妊娠期糖尿病对其妊娠影响的担忧、有利的干预治疗选择、对试验相关风险的低认知以及帮助医学研究的机会,似乎对她们的决策产生了重大影响。获得详细信息、与研究团队的个人互动、对参与自愿性的认知以及试验的可及性,对女性参与决策产生了积极影响。在招募过程中进行个人接触、提供清晰全面的试验信息、提供之前参与者的推荐,以及便利女性参与临床试验,都是试图提高孕期试验招募率时的重要策略。需要对拒绝参与临床试验的孕妇进行进一步研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验