Ballantyne Angela, Pullon Susan, Macdonald Lindsay, Barthow Christine, Wickens Kristen, Crane Julian
Bioethics. 2017 Jul;31(6):476-483. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12361.
There is increasing global pressure to ensure that pregnant women are responsibly and safely included in clinical research in order to improve the evidence base that underpins healthcare delivery during pregnancy. One supposed barrier to inclusion is the assumption that pregnant women will be reluctant to participate in research. There is however very little empirical research investigating the views of pregnant women. Their perspective on the benefits, burdens and risks of research is a crucial component to ensuring effective recruitment. The Research In Pregnancy Ethics (RIPE) study set out to ascertain the views of pregnant women about research participation using an inductive thematic analysis. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 women who had participated in a double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial in Wellington (New Zealand) while pregnant. Our results show that at least some pregnant women recognise the value and importance of research during pregnancy. The women we interviewed were deeply invested in the research process and outcomes. Key motivations for participating were altruism, playing a valuable civic role and the importance of research. The main perceived burdens related to inconvenience and time commitment. For some women, possible randomization to the placebo arm was regarded as a burden or disadvantage.
全球面临着越来越大的压力,要确保孕妇能够以负责任且安全的方式参与临床研究,以改善支撑孕期医疗服务的证据基础。一个被认为的参与障碍是假定孕妇会不愿意参与研究。然而,很少有实证研究调查孕妇的观点。她们对研究的益处、负担和风险的看法是确保有效招募的关键因素。孕期研究伦理(RIPE)研究旨在通过归纳主题分析来确定孕妇对参与研究的看法。我们对20名在惠灵顿(新西兰)怀孕期间参与了一项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验的女性进行了半结构化访谈。我们的结果表明,至少一些孕妇认识到孕期研究的价值和重要性。我们采访的女性深度参与了研究过程和结果。参与的主要动机是利他主义、发挥有价值的公民作用以及研究的重要性。主要感知到的负担与不便和时间投入有关。对一些女性来说,可能被随机分配到安慰剂组被视为一种负担或不利因素。