Suppr超能文献

东非与北美神经外科医生对脊柱创伤患者胸腰椎损伤分类的比较

A Comparison of Thoracolumbar Injury Classification in Spine Trauma Patients Among Neurosurgeons in East Africa Versus North America.

作者信息

Smith Caitlyn J, Bergene Eyerusalem B, Tadele Abraham, Mesfin Fassil B

机构信息

Neurological Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA.

Neurosurgery, Millennium School of Medicine, Addis Ababa, ETH.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Nov 21;14(11):e31761. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31761. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background In January 2021, we published findings evaluating the validity of thoracolumbar injury classification and biomechanical approach in the clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatments. A notable result in our study was patients with unstable burst fractures received an Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System (AO) score that recommended conservative treatment compared to a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) score that recommended surgical intervention. We designed a survey to determine reported differences in thoracolumbar injury classification, including the percentage of thoracolumbar spine fractures, type of classification system(s) used, use of classification system by board-certified neurosurgeons and neurosurgical residents, reliance on classification system to guide management, use of MRI in the evaluation of the posterior ligamentous complex, and readmission rate < 90 days at treating facilities. This study aims to determine which areas of neurosurgical practice in spine trauma patients differ among surgeons in North America and East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. Multiple classification systems have been proposed to describe thoracolumbar spine injuries. We hypothesized that there would be marked variability in the classification systems used to evaluate thoracolumbar spine injury among neurosurgeons in North America and East Africa. Methods The survey consisted of seven questions and was sent to 440 neurosurgeons practicing on the continents of North America and East Africa. Results A total of 67 surgeons responded, 50 from North America and 17 from East Africa, including Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sudan. A significant percentage of African respondents reported a higher thoracolumbar spine fracture rate than respondents in North America (53% and 30%, respectively). Regarding the classification system used, 65% of surgeons in East Africa reported using TLICS, whereas 62% of surgeons in North America reported using Denis 3-column classification. For patients with spine trauma, surgeons in East Africa and North America reported a similar percentage of readmission <90 days (47% and 52%, respectively). Conclusion Our findings vary in spine trauma classification for American and East African patients and still highlight crucial areas for improvement due to patient load, education, and resource accessibility.

摘要

背景 2021年1月,我们发表了评估胸腰椎损伤分类及生物力学方法在手术和非手术治疗临床结果中的有效性的研究结果。我们研究中的一个显著结果是,与推荐手术干预的胸腰椎损伤分类与严重程度评分(TLICS)相比,不稳定爆裂骨折患者获得的AO评分(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen System)推荐保守治疗。我们设计了一项调查,以确定胸腰椎损伤分类方面报告的差异,包括胸腰椎骨折的百分比、使用的分类系统类型、获得委员会认证的神经外科医生和神经外科住院医师对分类系统的使用、依靠分类系统指导治疗、在评估后韧带复合体时使用MRI的情况以及治疗机构的90天内再入院率。本研究旨在确定北美和东非(包括埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚和苏丹)的脊柱创伤患者的神经外科实践中,哪些方面在外科医生之间存在差异。已经提出了多种分类系统来描述胸腰椎脊柱损伤。我们假设,北美和东非的神经外科医生在用于评估胸腰椎脊柱损伤的分类系统方面会存在显著差异。方法 该调查由七个问题组成,并发送给在北美和东非大陆执业的440名神经外科医生。结果 共有67名外科医生回复,其中50名来自北美,17名来自东非,包括埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚和苏丹。相当比例的非洲受访者报告的胸腰椎骨折率高于北美受访者(分别为53%和30%)。关于所使用的分类系统,东非65%的外科医生报告使用TLICS,而北美62%的外科医生报告使用Denis三柱分类法。对于脊柱创伤患者,东非和北美的外科医生报告的90天内再入院率相似(分别为47%和52%)。结论 我们的研究结果表明,美国和东非患者在脊柱创伤分类方面存在差异,并且由于患者数量、教育水平和资源可及性等因素,仍突出了关键的改进领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc59/9774996/cc01de86e3f0/cureus-0014-00000031761-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验