Suppr超能文献

与2002年营养风险筛查相比,改良版重症患者营养风险评估是严重烧伤患者有效的营养风险筛查工具。

Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill is an effective nutrition risk screening tool in severely burned patients, compared with Nutrition Risk Screening 2002.

作者信息

Ma Zhenzhu, Zhang Yin, Zhang Qin, Wu Beiwen

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Burn, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Dec 8;9:1007885. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1007885. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the value of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) in the prognosis of severely burned patients.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study used medical data of severely burned patients admitted to the burn center of Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2015 and September 2021. Demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory nutritional indicators, mNUTRIC score and NRS2002 score were collected and analyzed in evaluation the value of two nutrition risk screening tools. Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to show the correlation between variables. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the ability of mNUTRIC and NRS2002 to predict mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were conducted to compare the overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify risk factors for 28-day mortality of severely burned patients.

RESULTS

A total of 429 adult patients with burn area larger than 30% total body surface area (TBSA) were included in this study. Incidence of nutrition risk was detected in 52.21% by mNUTRIC and 20.51% by NRS2002. However, mNUTRIC was superior to NRS2002 in predicting 28-day mortality (area under ROC curve: 0.795 vs. 0.726). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that high mNUTRIC [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.265, 95% CI = 1.469-12.380, = 0.008] and TBSA (HR = 1.056, 95% CI = 1.033-1.079, < 0.001) were independent predictors for 28-day mortality. After adjusting for covariates, high NRS2002 was not associated with 28-day mortality ( = 0.367).

CONCLUSION

The present study illustrated the effectiveness of mNUTRIC as nutrition risk screening tool among severely burned patients. Early identification of nutrition risk may help to maximize benefits of nutritional therapy by providing more aggressive nutritional therapy for patients at nutrition risk.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估改良的危重症营养风险(mNUTRIC)和营养风险筛查2002(NRS2002)在重度烧伤患者预后评估中的价值。

方法

本回顾性队列研究采用了2015年1月至2021年9月间收治于上海瑞金医院烧伤中心的重度烧伤患者的医疗数据。收集并分析了人口统计学资料、临床特征、实验室营养指标、mNUTRIC评分和NRS2002评分,以评估两种营养风险筛查工具的价值。采用Spearman相关性分析来显示变量之间的相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积来评估mNUTRIC和NRS2002预测死亡率的能力。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线并进行对数秩检验以比较总生存期(OS)。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型来确定重度烧伤患者28天死亡率的危险因素。

结果

本研究共纳入429例烧伤面积大于30%总体表面积(TBSA)的成年患者。mNUTRIC检测到的营养风险发生率为52.21%,NRS2002检测到的为20.51%。然而,mNUTRIC在预测28天死亡率方面优于NRS2002(ROC曲线下面积:0.795对0.726)。多变量Cox回归分析显示,高mNUTRIC[风险比(HR)=4.265,95%置信区间(CI)=1.469-12.380,P=0.008]和TBSA(HR=1.056,95%CI=1.033-1.079,P<0.001)是28天死亡率的独立预测因素。在调整协变量后,高NRS2002与28天死亡率无关(P=0.367)。

结论

本研究阐明了mNUTRIC作为重度烧伤患者营养风险筛查工具的有效性。早期识别营养风险可能有助于通过为存在营养风险的患者提供更积极的营养治疗,使营养治疗的益处最大化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e94/9773874/be6bddcfbc54/fnut-09-1007885-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验