Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, South Yorks S10 2TN, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Jun;98(3):775-791. doi: 10.1111/brv.12929. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
Wildlife trade is a key driver of extinction risk, affecting at least 24% of terrestrial vertebrates. The persistent removal of species can have profound impacts on species extinction risk and selection within populations. We draw together the first review of characteristics known to drive species use - identifying species with larger body sizes, greater abundance, increased rarity or certain morphological traits valued by consumers as being particularly prevalent in trade. We then review the ecological implications of this trade-driven selection, revealing direct effects of trade on natural selection and populations for traded species, which includes selection against desirable traits. Additionally, there exists a positive feedback loop between rarity and trade and depleted populations tend to have easy human access points, which can result in species being harvested to extinction and has the potential to alter source-sink dynamics. Wider cascading ecosystem repercussions from trade-induced declines include altered seed dispersal networks, trophic cascades, long-term compositional changes in plant communities, altered forest carbon stocks, and the introduction of harmful invasive species. Because it occurs across multiple scales with diverse drivers, wildlife trade requires multi-faceted conservation actions to maintain biodiversity and ecological function, including regulatory and enforcement approaches, bottom-up and community-based interventions, captive breeding or wildlife farming, and conservation translocations and trophic rewilding. We highlight three emergent research themes at the intersection of trade and community ecology: (1) functional impacts of trade; (2) altered provisioning of ecosystem services; and (3) prevalence of trade-dispersed diseases. Outside of the primary objective that exploitation is sustainable for traded species, we must urgently incorporate consideration of the broader consequences for other species and ecosystem processes when quantifying sustainability.
野生动物贸易是物种灭绝风险的主要驱动因素之一,至少影响了 24%的陆地脊椎动物。物种的持续减少会对物种灭绝风险和种群内的选择产生深远影响。我们综合了已知驱动物种利用的特征的首次综述,确定了具有较大体型、更高丰度、更高稀有性或消费者认为具有某些有价值形态特征的物种,这些特征在贸易中更为普遍。然后,我们综述了这种贸易驱动选择的生态影响,揭示了贸易对受贸易影响物种的自然选择和种群的直接影响,包括对理想特征的选择。此外,稀有性和贸易之间存在正反馈循环,而枯竭的种群往往更容易被人类利用,这可能导致物种被捕获至灭绝,并有可能改变源-汇动态。贸易引起的减少对生态系统的更广泛级联影响包括改变种子扩散网络、营养级联、植物群落的长期组成变化、改变森林碳储量以及有害入侵物种的引入。由于野生动物贸易发生在多个尺度上,具有多种驱动因素,因此需要采取多方面的保护行动来维护生物多样性和生态功能,包括监管和执法措施、自下而上和基于社区的干预措施、圈养或野生动物养殖以及保护迁移和营养野生化。我们强调了贸易和社区生态学交叉点上的三个新兴研究主题:(1)贸易的功能影响;(2)生态系统服务的改变供应;(3)贸易传播疾病的普遍存在。除了开发利用对受贸易影响物种的可持续性这一首要目标之外,我们还必须在量化可持续性时,迫切考虑到其他物种和生态过程的更广泛后果。