Suppr超能文献

**译文**: 急诊科新冠疫苗信息平台对疫苗接受度和接种率的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。

Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Messaging Platforms in Emergency Departments on Vaccine Acceptance and Uptake: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Center for Prehospital Emergency Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Feb 1;183(2):115-123. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.5909.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Large segments of the US population's primary health care access occurs in emergency departments (EDs). These groups have disproportionately high COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and lower vaccine uptake.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether provision of COVID-19 vaccine messaging platforms in EDs increases COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake in unvaccinated patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 7 hospital EDs in 4 US cities from December 6, 2021, to July 28, 2022. Noncritically ill adult patients who had not previously received COVID-19 vaccines were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

A 3-pronged COVID-19 vaccine messaging platform (an English- or Spanish-language 4-minute video; a 1-page informational flyer; and a brief, scripted message from an ED physician or nurse) was delivered during patient waiting times.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 2 primary outcomes were (1) COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, assessed by survey responses in the ED, and (2) receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine within 30 days, ascertained by ED confirmation of vaccination, electronic health record review, and telephone follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 496 participants enrolled (221 during intervention weeks and 275 during control weeks), the median (IQR) age was 39 (30-54) years, 205 (41.3%) were female, 193 (38.9%) were African American, 97 (19.6%) were Latinx, and 218 (44.0%) lacked primary care physicians. More intervention group participants, compared with control participants, stated that they would accept the vaccine in the ED (57 [25.8%] vs 33 [12.0%]; adjusted difference, 11.9 [95% CI, 4.5-19.3] percentage points; number needed to treat [NNT], 8 [95% CI, 5-22]). More intervention group participants than control participants received a COVID-19 vaccine within 30 days of their ED visit (44 [20.0%] vs 24 [8.7%]; adjusted difference, 7.9 [95% CI, 1.7-14.1] percentage points; NNT, 13 [95% CI, 7-60]). The intervention group had greater outcome effect sizes than the control group in participants who lacked a primary care physician (acceptance, 38 of 101 [37.6%] vs 16 of 117 [13.7%] [P for interaction = .004]; uptake, 31 of 101 [30.7%] vs 11 of 117 [9.4%] [P for interaction = .006]), as well as in Latinx persons (acceptance, 23 of 52 [44.2%] vs 5 of 48 [10.4%] [P for interaction = .004]; uptake, 22 of 52 [42.3%] vs 4 of 48 [8.3%] [P for interaction < .001]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this cluster randomized clinical trial showed that with low NNT, implementation of COVID-19 vaccine messaging platforms in EDs leads to greater vaccine acceptance and uptake in unvaccinated ED patients. Broad implementation in EDs could lead to greater COVID-19 vaccine delivery to underserved populations whose primary health care access occurs in EDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05142332.

摘要

重要性

大量美国人口的主要医疗保健服务发生在急诊部门(ED)。这些群体对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫程度过高,疫苗接种率也较低。

目的

确定在 ED 中提供 COVID-19 疫苗信息平台是否会增加未接种患者对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度和接种率。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 2021 年 12 月 6 日至 2022 年 7 月 28 日期间在美国 4 个城市的 7 家医院 ED 进行的前瞻性集群随机临床试验。未接种过 COVID-19 疫苗的非危重病成年患者被纳入研究。

干预措施

在患者等待时间内提供三管齐下的 COVID-19 疫苗信息平台(一个 4 分钟的英语或西班牙语视频;一个 1 页的信息传单;以及 ED 医生或护士的简短脚本信息)。

主要结果和测量

两个主要结果是(1)ED 调查应答中的 COVID-19 疫苗接受度,和(2)在 30 天内接种 COVID-19 疫苗的情况,通过 ED 确认接种、电子健康记录审查和电话随访来确定。

结果

在 496 名入组患者中(干预周 221 名,对照组 275 名),中位数(IQR)年龄为 39(30-54)岁,205 名(41.3%)为女性,193 名(38.9%)为非裔美国人,97 名(19.6%)为拉丁裔,218 名(44.0%)没有初级保健医生。与对照组相比,干预组更多的参与者表示他们会在 ED 接受疫苗(57 [25.8%] vs 33 [12.0%];调整后的差异为 11.9 [95% CI,4.5-19.3]个百分点;NNT,8 [95% CI,5-22])。与对照组相比,更多的干预组参与者在 ED 就诊后 30 天内接种了 COVID-19 疫苗(44 [20.0%] vs 24 [8.7%];调整后的差异为 7.9 [95% CI,1.7-14.1]个百分点;NNT,13 [95% CI,7-60])。在没有初级保健医生的患者中(接受疫苗,101 名中的 38 名[37.6%] vs 117 名中的 16 名[13.7%];交互作用 P 值=0.004;接种疫苗,101 名中的 31 名[30.7%] vs 117 名中的 11 名[9.4%];交互作用 P 值=0.006),以及拉丁裔患者中(接受疫苗,52 名中的 23 名[44.2%] vs 48 名中的 5 名[10.4%];交互作用 P 值=0.004;接种疫苗,52 名中的 22 名[42.3%] vs 48 名中的 4 名[8.3%];交互作用 P 值<0.001),干预组的效果大小大于对照组。

结论和相关性

这项集群随机临床试验的结果表明,在 ED 中实施 COVID-19 疫苗信息平台,在未接种的 ED 患者中,疫苗接种接受率和接种率的 NNT 较低。在 ED 广泛实施可能会导致更多的 COVID-19 疫苗接种到那些主要医疗保健服务在 ED 的服务不足的人群中。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05142332。

相似文献

4
Promotion of Influenza Vaccination in the Emergency Department.急诊科流感疫苗接种的推广
NEJM Evid. 2024 Apr;3(4):EVIDoa2300197. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300197. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验