• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国东部 12 种常见木本植物叶片展叶的温度敏感性。

Temperature sensitivity of leaf flushing in 12 common woody species in eastern China.

机构信息

School of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 25;861:160337. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160337. Epub 2022 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160337
PMID:36574556
Abstract

Leaf phenology is one of the most reliable indicators of global warming in temperate regions because it is highly sensitive to temperatures. Temperature sensitivity (S) is defined as the values of changed days of leaf flushing date (LUD) per degree increase in temperatures. Climate warming substantially advanced LUD in the temperate region, but its effect on S of LUD is still not clear. We used spring phenological records of 12 woody plants in eastern China in the years of 1983-2014 to explore temporal and spatial changes of LUD and S. Furthermore, we compared the difference of S and preseason temperatures in two periods (1983-1997 and 2000-2014), and explored the main factors regulating S. The results showed that the average LUD significantly advanced (-2.7 days per decade). The mean LUD over the period 1983-2014 was in day of the year (DOY) 87 ± 7 across sites and species for the early leaf flushing species (EFS), and mean DOY 102 ± 5 for the late leaf flushing species (LFS). LUD was earlier in low latitude than that in high latitude. S of Armeniaca vulgaris was the most sensitive to temperature across all sites (-3.66 d °C), while Firmiana simplex was the most insensitive (-2.37 d °C). LUD of EFS was more sensitive to temperature warming than that of LFS. At the same site, LUD of EFS would advance more obviously than that of LFS under global warming. For all species, S decreased significantly with shorter preseason length and warmer temperatures at the preseason end. Our results had demonstrated a strong relationship between S and the preseason length (mean temperature at the preseason end).

摘要

叶片物候是温带地区最可靠的全球变暖指标之一,因为它对温度高度敏感。温度敏感性 (S) 定义为每度升温导致叶片展叶日期 (LUD) 变化的天数。气候变暖极大地提前了温带地区的 LUD,但 LUD 的 S 对其的影响仍不清楚。我们使用了 1983-2014 年中国东部 12 种木本植物的春季物候记录,以探讨 LUD 和 S 的时空变化。此外,我们比较了两个时期(1983-1997 年和 2000-2014 年)S 和 preseason 温度的差异,并探讨了调节 S 的主要因素。结果表明,平均 LUD 显著提前(每十年减少 2.7 天)。在 1983-2014 年期间,早展叶种(EFS)的 LUD 平均在每年的 87 ± 7 日,晚展叶种(LFS)的 LUD 平均在 102 ± 5 日。低纬度的 LUD 早于高纬度。所有地点中,杏花(Armeniaca vulgaris)的 S 对温度最敏感(-3.66 d °C),而青桐(Firmiana simplex)最不敏感(-2.37 d °C)。EFS 的 LUD 对温度变暖的敏感性高于 LFS。在同一地点,在全球变暖下,EFS 的 LUD 比 LFS 更明显地提前。对于所有物种,S 随着 preseason 长度的缩短和 preseason 末期温度的升高而显著降低。我们的结果表明,S 与 preseason 长度( preseason 末期的平均温度)之间存在很强的关系。

相似文献

1
Temperature sensitivity of leaf flushing in 12 common woody species in eastern China.中国东部 12 种常见木本植物叶片展叶的温度敏感性。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 25;861:160337. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160337. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
Variations in the temperature sensitivity of spring leaf phenology from 1978 to 2014 in Mudanjiang, China.中国牡丹江地区 1978 年至 2014 年春季物候期对温度敏感性的变化。
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 May;63(5):569-577. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1489-8. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
3
Uniforming spring phenology under non-uniform climate warming across latitude in China.中国跨纬度非均匀气候变暖下的物候期均匀化。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 25;762:143177. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143177. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
Changes in temperature sensitivity of spring phenology with recent climate warming in Switzerland are related to shifts of the preseason.在瑞士,随着最近气候变暖,春季物候对温度敏感性的变化与预赛前的转变有关。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5189-5202. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13781. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Climate warming increases spring phenological differences among temperate trees.气候变暖增加了温带树木春季物候期的差异。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Oct;26(10):5979-5987. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15301. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Late to bed, late to rise-Warmer autumn temperatures delay spring phenology by delaying dormancy.晚睡晚起——温暖的秋季气温通过延迟休眠来延迟春季物候期。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Nov;27(22):5806-5817. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15858. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
7
Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species.全球变暖对四种温带树种物候的长期影响变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):997-1004. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14496. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Poleward shifts in the maximum of spring phenological responsiveness of Ginkgo biloba to temperature in China.中国银杏春季物候对温度响应最大值的向极移动。
New Phytol. 2023 Nov;240(4):1421-1432. doi: 10.1111/nph.19229. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
9
Distinct latitudinal patterns of shifting spring phenology across the Appalachian Trail Corridor.阿巴拉契亚步道沿线春季物候期转变的明显纬度差异模式。
Ecology. 2024 Oct;105(10):e4403. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4403. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
10
Variation in leaf flushing date influences autumnal senescence and next year's flushing date in two temperate tree species.叶片展叶期的变化会影响两种温带树种的秋季衰老和次年的展叶期。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7355-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321727111. Epub 2014 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Heat transfer processes in 'Shine Muscat' grapevine leaves in solar greenhouses under different irrigation treatments.不同灌溉处理下日光温室内‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄叶片的传热过程
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35105. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35105. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.