• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国牡丹江地区 1978 年至 2014 年春季物候期对温度敏感性的变化。

Variations in the temperature sensitivity of spring leaf phenology from 1978 to 2014 in Mudanjiang, China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Biometeorol. 2019 May;63(5):569-577. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1489-8. Epub 2017 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00484-017-1489-8
PMID:29249042
Abstract

Continuous long-term temperature sensitivity (S) of leaf unfolding date (LUD) and main impacting factors in spring in the period 1978-2014 for 40 plant species in Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China, were analyzed by using observation data from the China Phenological Observation Network (CPON), together with the corresponding meteorological data from the China Meteorological Data Service Center. Temperature sensitivities, slopes of the regression between LUD and mean temperature during the optimum preseason (OP), were analyzed using 15-year moving window to determine their temporal trends. Major factors impacting S were then chosen and evaluated by applying a random sampling method. The results showed that LUD was sensitive to mean temperature in a defined period before phenophase onset for all plant species analyzed. Over the period 1978-2014, the mean S of LUD for all plant species was - 3.2 ± 0.49 days °C. The moving window analysis revealed that 75% of species displayed increasing S of LUD, with 55% showing significant increases (P < 0.05). S for the other 25% exhibited a decreasing trend, with 17% showing significant decreases (P < 0.05). On average, S increased by 16%, from - 2.8 ± 0.83 days °C during 1980-1994 to - 3.30 ± 0.65 days °C during 2000-2014. For species with later LUD and longer OP, S tended to increase more, while species with earlier LUD and shorter OP tended to display a decreasing S. The standard deviation of preseason temperature impacted the temporal variation in S. Chilling conditions influenced S for some species, but photoperiod limitation did not have significant or coherent effects on changes in S.

摘要

利用中国物候观测网络(CPON)的观测数据和中国气象数据服务中心的相应气象数据,分析了 1978-2014 年黑龙江省牡丹江市 40 种植物在春季叶片展开日期(LUD)的连续长期温度敏感性(S)及其主要影响因素。采用 15 年滑动窗口分析了 LUD 与物候前最佳时段(OP)平均温度之间的回归斜率的温度敏感性,以确定其时间趋势。然后应用随机抽样法选择和评估影响 S 的主要因素。结果表明,在所分析的所有植物中,LUD 在物候开始前的特定时间段内对平均温度敏感。在 1978-2014 年期间,所有植物的 LUD 平均 S 为-3.2±0.49 天/℃。滑动窗口分析显示,75%的物种表现出 LUD 的 S 增加,其中 55%表现出显著增加(P<0.05)。另外 25%的物种的 S 表现出下降趋势,其中 17%表现出显著下降(P<0.05)。平均而言,S 增加了 16%,从 1980-1994 年的-2.8±0.83 天/℃增加到 2000-2014 年的-3.30±0.65 天/℃。对于 LUD 较晚和 OP 较长的物种,S 趋于增加更多,而 LUD 较早和 OP 较短的物种则倾向于显示出减少的 S。OP 前期温度的标准差影响 S 的时间变化。一些物种的冷胁迫条件影响 S,但光周期限制对 S 的变化没有显著或一致的影响。

相似文献

1
Variations in the temperature sensitivity of spring leaf phenology from 1978 to 2014 in Mudanjiang, China.中国牡丹江地区 1978 年至 2014 年春季物候期对温度敏感性的变化。
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 May;63(5):569-577. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1489-8. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
2
Temperature sensitivity of leaf flushing in 12 common woody species in eastern China.中国东部 12 种常见木本植物叶片展叶的温度敏感性。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 25;861:160337. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160337. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
3
Changes in flowering phenology of woody plants from 1963 to 2014 in North China.1963 年至 2014 年华北木本植物花期物候的变化。
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 May;63(5):579-590. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1377-2. Epub 2017 May 25.
4
Changes in temperature sensitivity of spring phenology with recent climate warming in Switzerland are related to shifts of the preseason.在瑞士,随着最近气候变暖,春季物候对温度敏感性的变化与预赛前的转变有关。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5189-5202. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13781. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Uniforming spring phenology under non-uniform climate warming across latitude in China.中国跨纬度非均匀气候变暖下的物候期均匀化。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 25;762:143177. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143177. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Impacts of global warming on phenology of spring leaf unfolding remain stable in the long run.从长远来看,全球变暖对春季叶片展叶物候的影响保持稳定。
Int J Biometeorol. 2017 Feb;61(2):287-292. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1210-3. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
New insights on plant phenological response to temperature revealed from long-term widespread observations in China.从中国长期广泛的观测中揭示植物物候对温度的反应的新见解。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2066-2078. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14002. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding.全球变暖对春季叶片展叶物候的影响正在减弱。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):104-7. doi: 10.1038/nature15402. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
9
Simulating changes in the leaf unfolding time of 20 plant species in China over the twenty-first century.模拟21世纪中国20种植物叶片展开时间的变化。
Int J Biometeorol. 2014 May;58(4):473-84. doi: 10.1007/s00484-013-0671-x. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species.全球变暖对四种温带树种物候的长期影响变化。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):997-1004. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14496. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Phylogenetic conservation in plant phenological traits varies between temperate and subtropical climates in China.中国温带和亚热带气候下植物物候性状的系统发育保守性存在差异。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Apr 10;15:1367152. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1367152. eCollection 2024.
2
Effects of ambient climate and three warming treatments on fruit production in an alpine, subarctic meadow community.环境气候和三种增温处理对高山亚北极草地群落果实产量的影响。
Am J Bot. 2021 Mar;108(3):411-422. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1631.