Suppr超能文献

研究富有同情心的社区:确定理论框架以评估公共卫生姑息治疗倡议背后的复杂过程。

Researching Compassionate Communities: Identifying theoretical frameworks to evaluate the complex processes behind public health palliative care initiatives.

作者信息

Bakelants Hanne, Vanderstichelen Steven, Chambaere Kenneth, Van Droogenbroeck Filip, De Donder Liesbeth, Deliens Luc, Dury Sarah, Cohen Joachim

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Belgium.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise (COCO), Belgium.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2023 Feb;37(2):291-301. doi: 10.1177/02692163221146589. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compassionate Communities have been put forward as a new model for community-based palliative care to positively impact the health and wellbeing of those experiencing challenges of serious illness, death, dying, and loss. Despite the growing international movement to develop these public health initiatives to end-of-life care, only a handful of initiatives have undergone some form of evaluation.

AIM

To provide guidance on designing evaluation research by identifying theoretical frameworks to understand the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities.

METHODS

To identify suitable theoretical frameworks for the study of Compassionate Communities, we applied two steps. The first step examined the characteristics of Compassionate Communities and translated them into assessment criteria for the selection of theoretical frameworks. The second step consisted of applying the identified assessment criteria to a list of widely used and highly cited theoretical frameworks.

RESULTS

Three well-established theoretical frameworks were identified as being most suitable to study the development, implementation, and underlying mechanisms of Compassionate Communities: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework (i-PARIHS), and the Extended Normalization Process Theory (ENPT).

CONCLUSIONS

The article supports and encourages the use of theoretical frameworks to evaluate the complex processes behind public health palliative care initiatives. The complementary use of two determinant frameworks and an implementation theory provides theoretical grounding to gain rich insights into the emergent and shifting interplays between agency, social processes, and contextual factors that shape the development and implementation of Compassionate Communities.

摘要

背景

关爱社区已被提出作为一种基于社区的姑息治疗新模式,以积极影响那些面临严重疾病、死亡、临终和丧失之挑战的人们的健康和福祉。尽管国际上越来越多地开展这些针对临终关怀的公共卫生倡议,但只有少数倡议经过了某种形式的评估。

目的

通过确定理论框架来理解关爱社区的发展、实施及潜在机制,为设计评估研究提供指导。

方法

为确定适合研究关爱社区的理论框架,我们采取了两个步骤。第一步考察关爱社区的特征,并将其转化为选择理论框架的评估标准。第二步是将确定的评估标准应用于一系列广泛使用且被高度引用的理论框架。

结果

确定了三个最适合研究关爱社区的发展、实施及潜在机制的成熟理论框架:实施研究综合框架(CFIR)、卫生服务研究实施促进行动综合框架(i-PARIHS)和扩展规范过程理论(ENPT)。

结论

本文支持并鼓励使用理论框架来评估公共卫生姑息治疗倡议背后的复杂过程。两个决定因素框架和一个实施理论的互补使用为深入了解塑造关爱社区发展和实施的机构、社会过程及背景因素之间新出现的和不断变化的相互作用提供了理论基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验