Park Ju-Hyun, Choi Sangjun, Koh Dong-Hee, Lim Dae Sung, Park Donguk, Kim Hwan-Cheol, Lee Sang-Gil, Lee Jihye, Lim Ji Seon, Sung Yeji, Yoon Ko Kyoung
Department of Statistics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Graduate School of Public Health and Healthcare Management, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Saf Health Work. 2022 Dec;13(4):493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to construct a job-exposure matrix for lead that accounts for industry and work processes within industries using a nationwide exposure database. METHODS: We used the work environment measurement data (WEMD) of lead monitored nationwide from 2015 to 2016. Industrial hygienists standardized the work process codes in the database to 37 standard process and extracted key index words for each process. A total of 37 standardized process codes were allocated to each measurement based on an automated key word search based on the degree of agreement between the measurement information and the standard process index. Summary statistics, including the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, and 95th percentile level (X95), was calculated according to industry, process, and industry process. Using statistical parameters of contrast and precision, we compared the similarity of exposure groups by industry, process, and industry process. RESULTS: The exposure intensity of lead was estimated for 583 exposure groups combined with 128 industry and 35 process. The X95 value of the "casting" process of the "manufacture of basic precious and non-ferrous metals" industry was 53.29 μg/m, exceeding the occupational exposure limit of 50 μg/m. Regardless of the limitation of the minimum number of samples in the exposure group, higher contrast was observed when the exposure groups were by industry process than by industry or process. CONCLUSION: We evaluated the exposure intensities of lead by combination of industry and process. The results will be helpful in determining more accurate information regarding exposure in lead-related epidemiological studies.
背景:本研究的目的是利用全国性暴露数据库构建一个考虑行业及行业内工作流程的铅作业暴露矩阵。 方法:我们使用了2015年至2016年全国监测的铅的工作环境测量数据(WEMD)。工业卫生学家将数据库中的工作流程代码标准化为37个标准流程,并为每个流程提取关键索引词。根据测量信息与标准流程索引之间的一致程度,基于自动关键词搜索为每次测量分配总共37个标准化流程代码。根据行业、流程和行业流程计算了包括算术平均值、几何平均值和第95百分位数水平(X95)在内的汇总统计数据。使用对比和精度的统计参数,我们比较了按行业、流程和行业流程划分的暴露组的相似性。 结果:估计了结合128个行业和35个流程的583个暴露组的铅暴露强度。“基本贵金属和有色金属制造”行业“铸造”流程的X95值为53.29μg/m,超过了50μg/m的职业暴露限值。无论暴露组中样本数量的限制如何,按行业流程划分的暴露组比按行业或流程划分时观察到更高的对比。 结论:我们通过行业和流程的组合评估了铅的暴露强度。结果将有助于在铅相关的流行病学研究中确定更准确的暴露信息。
Saf Health Work. 2021-12
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017-11-10
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024-3-15
J Korean Med Sci. 2023-8-28
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019-7-24
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021-10-9
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2024-8-6
J Korean Med Sci. 2023-8-28
Saf Health Work. 2021-12
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021-6-12
Occup Environ Med. 2019-1-31
J Occup Environ Med. 2018-7
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017-11-10
Saf Health Work. 2017-9
Occup Environ Med. 2015-6