• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[内脏和胸外科手术中的机器人——何去何从?]

[Robots in visceral and thoracic surgery-Quo vadis?].

作者信息

Umstadt Julia, Kallenberger Mali, Bäumer Ole, Egberts Jan-Hendrik

机构信息

Klinik für Chirurgie, Israelitisches Krankenhaus Hamburg, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Hamburg, Viszeral-Medizinisches Zentrum, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;94(4):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01787-5. Epub 2022 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-022-01787-5
PMID:36580100
Abstract

Robotic surgical systems are now an inherent part of the German hospital landscape. In recent years, there has been an enormous increase in installed systems and operations performed, especially in abdominal surgery. Even though there is a lack of studies with the highest grade of evidence, the advantages of the technique are obvious-particularly technically demanding operations can now be performed safely and less invasively for patients. Robotics are now being implemented in many non-university institutions. At the Israelite Hospital (Israelitisches Krankenhaus) Hamburg it could be demonstrated that with systematic and modular training, i.e. execution of certain surgical steps, it is possible to significantly flatten the learning curve while maintaining excellent oncological quality, postoperative morbidity and mortality. The costs to have a system up and running are the main limitations for the implementation of robotic surgery. The acquisition, material and maintenance costs are substantial so that the type of intervention and the training of prospective surgeons are limited by the costs. The robotic approach will fully unroll its disruptive character compared to laparoscopy once it is competitive not only qualitatively in the field of medical contents but also economically. In the future the ROBIN working group of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) wants to create the basic prerequisites for valid studies by working with registers and could act as an independent central intermediary between hospitals and the industry to promote practical innovations and systematic training for surgeons.

摘要

机器人手术系统如今已成为德国医院格局中不可或缺的一部分。近年来,已安装系统的数量以及所开展手术的数量都大幅增加,尤其是在腹部手术方面。尽管缺乏最高级别证据的研究,但该技术的优势显而易见——特别是对于技术要求高的手术,现在可以安全地进行,且对患者的侵袭性更小。机器人技术如今正在许多非大学附属医院中得到应用。在汉堡的以色列医院可以证明,通过系统的模块化培训,即执行某些手术步骤,在保持出色的肿瘤治疗质量、术后发病率和死亡率的同时,有可能显著缩短学习曲线。让系统投入运行的成本是机器人手术应用的主要限制因素。购置、耗材和维护成本很高,以至于干预类型和未来外科医生的培训都受到成本的限制。一旦机器人手术不仅在医疗内容领域在质量上具有竞争力,而且在经济上也具有竞争力,那么与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术方法将充分展现其颠覆性特征。未来,德国普通和内脏外科学会(DGAV)的ROBIN工作组希望通过与登记机构合作,为开展有效研究创造基本条件,并可以作为医院与行业之间独立的中央中介,以促进外科医生的实践创新和系统培训。

相似文献

1
[Robots in visceral and thoracic surgery-Quo vadis?].[内脏和胸外科手术中的机器人——何去何从?]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;94(4):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01787-5. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
2
Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.机器人腹腔镜手术:成本与培训
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2009 Jun;61(2):121-8.
3
[Robot-assisted operations in visceral surgery].[内脏外科中的机器人辅助手术]
Chirurg. 2020 Mar;91(3):190-194. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-01092-8.
4
Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery.机器人技术在妇科良性手术中的优势。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;28(4):304-10. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000293.
5
Robotic total thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection via unilateral retroauricular approach.经单侧耳后入路机器人辅助全甲状腺切除术并改良根治性颈清扫术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3872-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3896-y. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
6
Clinical implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system in visceral surgery-A single centre experience and review of the first 175 patients.Versius 机器人手术系统在内脏外科中的临床应用——单中心经验及对前 175 例患者的回顾。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):528-534. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09526-x. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
[Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on robotic visceral surgery in Germany].[新冠疫情对德国机器人内脏手术的影响]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Aug;93(8):765-777. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01684-x. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.机器人技术、远程手术和远程指导——它们在现代泌尿外科腹腔镜手术中的地位。
Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):610-28.
9
Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.机器人单孔手术的现状和未来方向:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):266-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
10
Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.机器人手术在盆底重建中的作用。
Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Feb;71(1):4-17. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04331-9. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term outcomes in robot-assisted compared to laparoscopic colon cancer resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的短期结果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):32-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08782-7. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Defining benchmarks for robotic-assisted low anterior rectum resection in low-morbid patients: a multicenter analysis.定义低风险患者机器人辅助低位前直肠切除术的基准:一项多中心分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep;36(9):1945-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03988-6. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
3
Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Early Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the RAMIE Trial.
机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管鳞状细胞癌:一项多中心随机对照试验的早期结果:RAMIE试验
Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):646-653. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005023.
4
[DeRAS I-German situation of robotic-assisted surgery-an online survey].[德国机器人辅助手术的现状——一项在线调查]
Chirurg. 2021 Dec;92(12):1107-1113. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01404-x. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Learning curve of robotic distal and total gastrectomy.机器人远端和全胃切除术的学习曲线。
Br J Surg. 2021 Sep 27;108(9):1126-1132. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab152.
6
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Outcomes Improved After National Training Program (LAPCO) for Specialists in England.英国专家的腹腔镜结直肠手术国家培训计划(LAPCO)后,腹腔镜结直肠手术结果得到改善。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):1149-1155. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004584. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
How to Establish Benchmarks for Surgical Outcomes?: A Checklist Based on an International Expert Delphi Consensus.如何建立手术结果的基准?基于国际专家 Delphi 共识的检查表。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):115-120. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003931.
8
[Evidence for robotic surgery in oncological visceral surgery].[肿瘤内脏手术中机器人手术的证据]
Chirurg. 2019 May;90(5):379-386. doi: 10.1007/s00104-019-0812-9.
9
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
10
Safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic liver resections: A systematic review.机器人肝脏切除术的安全性和肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价。
J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;117(7):1517-1530. doi: 10.1002/jso.25018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.