• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种用于筛选肿瘤住院患者是否需要专科姑息治疗的工具:ScreeningPALL 研究的研究方案。

Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e059598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598
PMID:36581985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9438211/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A range of referral criteria and scores have been developed in recent years to help with screening for the need of specialist palliative care (SPC) in advanced, incurable cancer patients. However, referral criteria have not yet been widely implemented in oncology, as they usually need to be revised by physicians or nurses with limited time resources. To develop an easily applicable screening for the need for SPC in incurable cancer inpatients, we aim to (a) test inter-rater reliability of multiprofessional expert opinion as reference standard for SPC need (phase I) and (b) explore the diagnostic validity of selected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and routine data for the need of SPC (phase II).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Inclusion criteria for patients are metastatic or locally advanced, incurable cancer, ≥18 years of age and informed consent by patient or proxy. (Exclusion criteria: malignant haematological disease as main diagnosis). In phase I, three palliative care consultation teams (PCTs) of three German university hospitals assess the SPC need of 20 patient cases. Fleiss' Kappa will be calculated for inter-rater reliability. In phase II, 208 patients are consecutively recruited in four inpatient oncology wards of Freiburg University Hospital. The PCT will provide assessment of SPC need. As potential referral criteria, patients complete PROMs and a selection of routine data on person, disease and treatment is documented. Logistic regression models and ROC analyses are employed to test their utility in screening for SPC need.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Our findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific meetings and congresses. Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany (approval no. 20-1103).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00021686, registered on 17 December 2020.

摘要

简介

近年来,已经开发出一系列转诊标准和评分,以帮助筛选需要接受晚期不可治愈癌症患者的专科姑息治疗(SPC)。然而,转诊标准尚未在肿瘤学中广泛实施,因为它们通常需要由时间资源有限的医生或护士进行修订。为了开发一种易于应用的筛选方法,以确定不可治愈的癌症住院患者是否需要 SPC,我们旨在:(a)测试多专业专家意见的组内一致性,作为 SPC 需求的参考标准(第 I 阶段);(b)探索选定的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)和常规数据对 SPC 需求的诊断有效性(第 II 阶段)。

方法和分析

患者纳入标准为转移性或局部晚期、不可治愈的癌症,年龄≥18 岁,并获得患者或代理人的知情同意。(排除标准:恶性血液病作为主要诊断)。在第 I 阶段,三家德国大学医院的三个姑息治疗咨询团队(PCT)评估 20 例患者的 SPC 需求。将计算 Fleiss' Kappa 以评估组内一致性。在第 II 阶段,弗赖堡大学医院的四个住院肿瘤科病房连续招募 208 例患者。PCT 将提供 SPC 需求评估。作为潜在的转诊标准,患者完成 PROMs,并记录人员、疾病和治疗的选择常规数据。将使用逻辑回归模型和 ROC 分析来测试其在筛选 SPC 需求方面的效用。

伦理和传播

我们的研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在国家和国际科学会议和大会上展示。德国阿尔伯特-路德维希-弗莱堡大学伦理委员会批准了本研究(批准号:20-1103)。

试验注册编号

德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00021686,于 2020 年 12 月 17 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9438211/81ba2f4a4ba8/bmjopen-2021-059598f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9438211/4f244002d25c/bmjopen-2021-059598f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9438211/81ba2f4a4ba8/bmjopen-2021-059598f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9438211/4f244002d25c/bmjopen-2021-059598f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d7/9438211/81ba2f4a4ba8/bmjopen-2021-059598f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a screening tool for the need of specialist palliative care in oncologic inpatients: study protocol for the ScreeningPALL Study.开发一种用于筛选肿瘤住院患者是否需要专科姑息治疗的工具:ScreeningPALL 研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 1;12(9):e059598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059598.
2
Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study.多专业病例回顾的观察者间一致性作为专科姑息治疗需求的参考标准:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Nov 16;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01281-7.
3
Identifying the need for specialized palliative care in adult cancer patients - development and validation of a screening procedure based on proxy assessment by physicians and filter questions.识别成人癌症患者对专科姑息治疗的需求 - 基于医生代理评估和筛选问题的筛查程序的制定和验证。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;19(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5809-8.
4
Screening for Palliative Care Need in Oncology: Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.肿瘤患者姑息治疗需求的筛查:患者报告结局测量的验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Apr;67(4):279-289.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.013. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
5
Specialist palliative care services for adults with advanced, incurable illness in hospital, hospice, or community settings--protocol for a systematic review.针对医院、临终关怀机构或社区环境中患有晚期不治之症的成年人的专科姑息治疗服务——系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 25;4:123. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0121-4.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
7
Multicomponent non-pharmacological intervention to prevent delirium for hospitalised people with advanced cancer: study protocol for a phase II cluster randomised controlled trial.多组分非药物干预预防晚期癌症住院患者谵妄的研究方案:一项 II 期群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e026177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026177.
8
Outpatient palliative care referral system (PCRS) for patients with advanced cancer: an impact evaluation protocol.晚期癌症患者的门诊姑息治疗转介系统(PCRS):影响评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 28;12(10):e059410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059410.
9
Surgical Versus Medical Team Assignment and Secondary Palliative Care Services for Patients Dying in a Cardiac Hospital.心脏医院中临终患者的手术团队与医疗团队分配及二级姑息治疗服务
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Apr;36(4):316-320. doi: 10.1177/1049909118819462. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Implementation of quality indicators for palliative care for patients with incurable cancer at palliative care units in Germany (Quincie): a study protocol for a mixed-methods study.德国姑息治疗病房对不可治愈癌症患者的姑息治疗质量指标的实施(Quincie):一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e077457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077457.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the sensitivity and acceptability of the Royal Marsden Palliative Care Referral "Triggers" Tool for outpatients with cancer.评估皇家马斯登姑息治疗转诊“触发”工具在癌症门诊患者中的敏感性和可接受性。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 16;32(11):730. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08921-5.
2
Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study.多专业病例回顾的观察者间一致性作为专科姑息治疗需求的参考标准:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Nov 16;22(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01281-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of visitor restriction rules on the postoperative experience of COVID-19 negative patients undergoing surgery.访客限制规定对 COVID-19 阴性手术患者术后体验的影响。
Surgery. 2020 Nov;168(5):770-776. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
2
Stress and Symptom Burden in Oncology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.肿瘤患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的压力和症状负担。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Nov;60(5):e25-e34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.08.037. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Breast Cancer and COVID-19: The Effect of Fear on Patients' Decision-making Process.
乳腺癌与 COVID-19:恐惧对患者决策过程的影响。
In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1651-1659. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11957.
4
Oncology services in corona times: a flash interview among German cancer patients and their physicians.肿瘤学服务在新冠时期:德国癌症患者及其医生的闪访。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct;146(10):2713-2715. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03249-z. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study.双重意外问题筛查预测恶化和死亡:一项探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0503-9.
6
Identifying the need for specialized palliative care in adult cancer patients - development and validation of a screening procedure based on proxy assessment by physicians and filter questions.识别成人癌症患者对专科姑息治疗的需求 - 基于医生代理评估和筛选问题的筛查程序的制定和验证。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;19(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5809-8.
7
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
PALLIA-10, a screening tool to identify patients needing palliative care referral in comprehensive cancer centers: A prospective multicentric study (PREPA-10).PALLIA-10,一种用于识别综合性癌症中心需要姑息治疗转诊的患者的筛查工具:一项前瞻性多中心研究(PREPA-10)。
Cancer Med. 2019 Jun;8(6):2950-2961. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2118. Epub 2019 May 4.
9
Examination of referral criteria for outpatient palliative care among patients with advanced cancer.对晚期癌症患者门诊姑息治疗转诊标准的检查。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan;28(1):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04811-3. Epub 2019 May 1.
10
Economics of Palliative Care for Hospitalized Adults With Serious Illness: A Meta-analysis.成人重症患者姑息治疗的经济学研究:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):820-829. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0750.