Suppr超能文献

多剂量促红细胞生成素治疗创伤性脑损伤的比较安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。

Comparative safety of multiple doses of erythropoietin for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zheng Qingyong, Duan Dan, Xu Jianguo, Wang Xing, Ge Yonggui, Xiong Lu, Yang Jingjing, Wulayin Saimire, Luo Xiaofeng

机构信息

School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 13;13:998320. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.998320. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the past few decades, advances in traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathology research have dynamically enriched our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to systematically elucidate the safety and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) dosing regimens in patients with TBI.

METHODS

Data search included PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for related research published before July 2022. The network meta-analysis was conducted using ADDIS 1.16.8, and the CINeMA tool was used to assess the quality level of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs involving 981 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. EPO did not significantly reduce mortality in patients with TBI, but its risk of death decreased with increasing dosage (odds ratio (OR) of 12,000u vs. placebo = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.03-40.34; OR of group 30,000u vs. placebo = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.06-5.88; OR of 40,000u vs. placebo = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.01-9.43; OR of 70,000u vs. placebo = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.01-9.26; OR of group 80,000u vs. placebo = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.00-7.45). A total of three studies involving 739 patients showed that EPO did not increase the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with TBI. However, the risk tended to rise as the dosage increased. Another two studies demonstrated that EPO did not increase the incidence of pulmonary embolism. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Although the efficacy of EPO was not statistically demonstrated, we found a trend toward an association between EPO dosage and reduced mortality and increased embolic events in patients with TBI. More high-quality original studies should be conducted to obtain strong evidence on the optimal dosage of EPO.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=272500. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021272500).

摘要

引言

在过去几十年中,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)病理学研究的进展极大地丰富了我们的知识。因此,我们旨在系统地阐明促红细胞生成素(EPO)给药方案对TBI患者的安全性和有效性。

方法

数据检索包括PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov,以获取2022年7月之前发表的相关研究。使用ADDIS 1.16.8进行网络荟萃分析,并使用CINeMA工具评估证据的质量水平。

结果

网络荟萃分析共纳入6项随机对照试验,涉及981例患者。EPO并未显著降低TBI患者的死亡率,但其死亡风险随剂量增加而降低(12,000u组与安慰剂组的比值比(OR)=0.98,95%可信区间:0.03 - 40.34;30,000u组与安慰剂组的OR = 0.56,95%可信区间:0.06 - 5.88;40,000u组与安慰剂组的OR = 0.35,95%可信区间:0.01 - 9.43;70,000u组与安慰剂组的OR = 0.29,95%可信区间:0.01 - 9.26;80,000u组与安慰剂组的OR = 0.22,95%可信区间:0.00 - 7.45)。共有3项涉及739例患者的研究表明,EPO并未增加TBI患者深静脉血栓形成的发生率。然而,风险有随剂量增加而上升的趋势。另外两项研究表明,EPO并未增加肺栓塞的发生率。所有结局的证据质量为低到中等。

结论

尽管EPO的疗效未得到统计学证实,但我们发现EPO剂量与TBI患者死亡率降低和栓塞事件增加之间存在关联趋势。应开展更多高质量的原始研究,以获得关于EPO最佳剂量的有力证据。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=272500。该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42021272500)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba5e/9793776/dccb1394056e/fneur-13-998320-g0001.jpg

相似文献

3
Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury.
BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01958-z.
4
Erythropoietin in traumatic brain injury (EPO-TBI): a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2499-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00386-4. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
6
Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury: A New Paradigm.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:465-475. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.142. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Does erythropoietin affect the outcome and complication rates of patient with traumatic brain injury? A pooled-analysis.
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jun;43(6):3783-3793. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-05877-4. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;37(6):1101-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.072. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
The effect of recombinant erythropoietin on long-term outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):831-839. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07141-5. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin for traumatic brain injury.
BMC Neurol. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01958-z.
5
Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury: A New Paradigm.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;142:465-475. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.142. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Recent advances in traumatic brain injury.
J Neurol. 2019 Nov;266(11):2878-2889. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09541-4. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
A Review of the Molecular Mechanisms of Traumatic Brain Injury.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.039. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Recombinant human erythropoietin for treating severe traumatic brain injury.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(1):e9532. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009532.
9
Efficacy and safety of drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;27(10):1335-1345. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1125-0. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Software and package applicating for network meta-analysis: A usage-based comparative study.
J Evid Based Med. 2018 Aug;11(3):176-183. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12264. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验